Free Order - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut


File Size: 52.3 kB
Pages: 2
Date: March 5, 2004
File Format: PDF
State: Connecticut
Category: District Court of Connecticut
Author: unknown
Word Count: 420 Words, 2,402 Characters
Page Size: 612.72 x 1008 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ctd/22963/21.pdf

Download Order - District Court of Connecticut ( 52.3 kB)


Preview Order - District Court of Connecticut
Case 3:03-cv-01033-SRU Document 21 Filed O3/O3/2004 Page 1 of 2 i
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT F H.- E D
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
liillli MAR -3 P S 00 E
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : Ot _,_ i
. t` A ore 2
. us cisraitr . _ 1
V· 2 Civ. Action BQRIDBEPORX QT E
: 3:03CVl033 (SRU) i
171 LINCOLN AVE., ET AL. 1 I
ORDER RE: STATUS i
On or before March 23, 2004, the parties shall tile with the Clerk at Bridgeport; a joint I
status report setting forth responses to the questions set forth below (it is not necessary for the _
parties to recite the questions in their report). If the parties disagree with respect to an answer, i
set forth the different responses. A courtesy copy of the report, both in hard copy and on a 3.5" I
1
computer diskette (in WordPerfect format), shall be submitted to Chambers.
A. OVERVIEW OF THE CASE
l l. Briefly describe the nature of this matter, the relief requested, and any relationship
this case may have to other pending actions.
2. Provide a concise summary of disputed issues of fact and law. R
3. Briefly describe what discovery has been taken to date. Is discovery completed?
If not, how much additional time is needed and what additional discovery is
necessary? Will there be a request for a modification of the Scheduling Order? If I
so, what will be the request?
4. What do the parties believe that the Court can do to facilitate the resolution of this
case?
B. SETTLEMENT
l. The parties are directed to discuss settlement in good faith and to certify that they
have done so since the issuance of this order. i
2. When was the last settlement conference and who conducted it? Arc there any
i



Case 3:03-cv-01033-SRU Document 21 Filed O3/O3/2004 Page 2 of 2
outstanding reports due the person conducting the settlement conference?
3. Do the parties believe a settlement conference or assignment to a special master
would be beneficial at this time? If not, explain what additional discovery or
motion practice is necessary to facilitate settlement discussions.
C. TRIAL PREPARATION
1. When will the case be ready for trial?
2. What additional preparation, other than that previously discussed, is required?
3. Are there additional pleadings to be tiled? If so, identify them.
It is so ordered. _
Dated at Bridgeport this 3"’ day of March, 2004. A I
gtefag R. Underhill V I n I
United States District Judge I

I
I
I
· _ rtaa l