Free Reply to Response to Motion - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

[Mm"` iiii iTa ;"“"· ..»W...m.mi----.
i ” Case 3:03-cv-01036;DJS Document 26 Filed 10/17f2003 Page 1 of 2
l " CJ (__)
"jC.' 1 ‘- a*‘‘ · A, `
l - . ,
l Z lil] l "E A 'lj: { "I
l · l In UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT {-I-I j .1“. . . .
1 DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT I - l
l ; crvn. Action N0. 3:03CVl036 (sku) I
Y Plaintiff; ; l
= ‘ v. 3 l
GRAND ADVENTURES TOUR & I .
l TRAVEL PUBLISHING CORPORATION, `
~ INTERLINE TRAVEL & TOUR, INC., I E
l Defendants. : October 16, 2003
PLAINTIFF’S OBJECTION TO
DEFENDANT INTERLINE’S REQUEST TO TRANSFER VENUE .
On September 22, 2003, Defendant Interline Travel & Tour, Inc. ("Interline") filed in a
"Memorandum of Law In Further Support of Interline Travel & Tour’s Motion to Dismiss," l
wherein Interline, inter alia, "move[d] that this case be transferred to the United States District p
Court for the Western District of Texas for the convenience ofthe parties and the witnesses in J
this case," at 9, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. l404(a). As set forth in Plaintiff s Memorandum of Law, I
I
Interline has: (a) failed to satisfy its burden of proof on its "motion" to transfer venue and (b) I
failed to satisfy its burden of establishing that the exercise of personal jurisdiction by this Court R
l
would be unreasonable under a due process analysis. 5
ORAL ARGUMENT REQUESTED!
TESTIMONY NOT REQUIRED
`iii
I __ T __ , __ , __ yp __ nilin ITT

l d, __ Case 3:03-cv—010iz6¤DJS Document 26 Filed 10/1{%2)003 Page 2 of 2
J PLAINTIFF
` CALL CENTER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
i By A . / ,_ `
, D. Garamell f ·
l » lins, Hannafin, Garamclla, i
Jaber & Tuozzolo, P.C. _
y 148 Deer Hill Avenue
. Danbury, CT 06810
E Telephone: (203) 744-2150
l Federal Bar ID CT 05973 i
y CERTIFICATION OF SERVICE
l I _
This is to certify that the foregoing Motion was mailed on the 16“‘ of October, 2003 to the I
following: K
Laura F. Baldini, Esquire g
2 Batterson Park Road \
2nd Floor
Farmington, Connecticut 06032 i
- Jac D. ara · I
\-- [
ii i