Free Motion to Withdraw as Attorney - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

I T"` ` TT"' '''' -"—· ;—··rr ——-»-—-~—~—- ;..A.....I,.,l.-,i._...-_. _____________ _M_wT_-I-_——‘ “
l Case 3:03-cv—01036jDJS Document 38 Filed 08/20/2004 Page 1 of 4
I ° F O C-)
l I
I l ‘ =5"·=*· *! TE i" i
l rr - li"` ii Z' ,a’4 Y I
an nas 20 A €%= W
i r; {‘,_ t=i§r,`;‘§-?{a";i` [lll?
_ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT I " 2‘e‘al1i @7 if .TT`
l DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
; ctvn. Action No. smcviose (sku)
{2 Plaintiff ;
S
G V. :
E GRAND ADVENTURES TOUR & ;
5 TRAVEL PUBLISHING CORPORATION,
3 INTERLINE TRAVEL & TOUR, INC.,l :
gg Defendants. i : AUGUST ll, 2004
EE 3,
il rx
E3 -
d g REQUEST FOR LEAVE TO WITHDRAW APPEARANCE
gg 2 ON BEHALF OF THE PLAINILIFF CALL CENTER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
g EJ go Pursuant to Local Rule 7(e) ofthe United States District Court, District of Connecticut, Local i
§ § Rules of Civil Procedure ("Local Rules") Attorney Gregg A. Brauneisen, on behalf of the law firm
O l
0 • E
§ of Collins, Hannatin, Garamella, J aber & Tuozzolo, P.C. respectfully requests permission to withdraw i
z
g as counsel for the Plaintiff Cali Center Technologies, Inc. in the above referenced matter. i
§
Q The Plaintiff in this case has failed to cooperate with counsel regarding conducting discovery
and the Plaintiff has failed to cooperate with counsel regarding answering Defendant Interline Travel
& Tour, Inc.’s Interrogatories. The Plaintiff s failure to cooperate with counsel continues despite
repeated written requests and phone calls from counsel asking the Plaintiff to provide information
, __ gg __ gg __ gg __ gg H gg I l I liii _ I _
__ gg __ gg H gg N gg H gg I iilfiiif ` I

`... .... . ..L. .;...L ..;._Lm.._.__.._.a,.._...L.;....-_.L_W______--....,.,_.,_.i. _r__________.________ LW
Case 3:03-cv-O103§jDJS Document 38 Filed 08/20/2004 Page 2 of 4
( — - (P) Q,)
\ .
regarding discovery, a large part of which was to take place in Texas, and that the Plaintiff answer `
Defendant interline Travel & Tour, Inc.’s Interrogatories.
The Plaintiffs failure to cooperateand communicate with counsel has made it impossible for
Q ‘ 3
§ counsel to provide any kind of effective representation to the Plaintiff
§ The Plaintiff has been sent a copy of this Motion to Withdraw by both certified and regular mail i
5
E and has been notified ofthe need to engige successor counsel in the event this motion is granted.
gl S
EE O Gregg A. Brauneisen, on behalf of the law firm of Collins, Hannan, Garamella, Jaber &
o ,
Ei it Tuozzolo, P.C., therefore respectfully requests permission of the Court to have his appearance
nu rc l
E " 8 ‘
5% i withdrawn as counsel for the Plaintiff in this matter, l
... ““ s
§ § Dated this llth day of August, 2004. I
i E PLAINTIFF . i
jg "° CALL CENTER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. i
E m
§ By ‘ i
Q Gregg A. Brauneisen, of
g Collins, Hannafin, Garamella,
E Jaber & Tuozzolo, P.C.
*-2 148 Deer Hill Avenue
Danbury, CT 06810
Telephone: (203) 744-2150

r»»é—*»... - .... _m_____________ . _“_ _‘_ "
i Case 3:03-cv—01036—DJS Document 38 Filed 08/20/2004 Page 3 of 4
i *""— / ‘x
I · · C J J
{
i
1
i
ORDER
-
§ The foregoing Motion having been heard by this Court, it is hereby ORDERED:
ij GRANTED/DENIED.
E5 THE COURT

§ · $ I
-··3§ BY: /
I V -
sig •
m
za;
Z I II
§ E ?¤
i
3- g
E
Q
9
Q

... .--... . . . _" , ,4_...,,..L,;... ______ |H______m_ __ __l______
i _mwMhm—__—_—____—M““h_;———___mh" It`!
Case 3:03-cv—O1OI§§TDJS Document 38 Filed 08/2Q[2004 Page 4 of 4 l
r · ‘ j
i
l
CEVRTIFICATION
l
This is to certify that a copy of the foregoing was mailed, postage prepaid on August ll,
2004, to the following:
Q
g Laura F. Baldini, Esquire
Q 2 Batterson Park Road i
Q 2"" Floor A
g Farmington, CT 06032
SE
gg Call Center Technologies, [nc. ,
§ S O 632-640 Federal Road
2 · Brookfield, CT 06804 l
its -~ ‘ l
gig f Gregg A. Bra neisen
ii?] T i
E2 2 T
iss R
E E 3:
Q5; T
E 1 T
8 .
E T
z i
6 l