Free Motion for Bond - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

` .. _ ase 3:03-cv-O104ۤRU Document 28 Filed 03/1 $[2004 Paget of 3
l F z l... E D
l l Zllllll MAR l8 P l2= U3
l UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT U.S. DISLTRIQT COURT
DISTRICT or cowmracricur B'**UW’0R V- CONN
l I<.L.C., INC., KEYSTONE LEASING
r Plaintiff : F
l : CIVIL NO. 3:03CV1043 (SRU)
E vs. : y
l CYNTHIA TRAYNER
l Defendant :
I __ : MARCH 17, 2004
APPLICATION FOR STAY PENDING APPEAL y
AND TO WAIVE BOND REQUIREMENTS
The Defendant, Cynthia Trayner, moves this honorable court to issue a stay
pending appeal and to waive any bond requirement. In support of said application \
the Defendant represents as follows:
1. This honorable court on February 4, 2004 granted Plaintlff's Motion I
for Judgment of Strict Foreclosure and set a Law Day of June 1, 2004. .
2. The court set a Law Day of June 1, 2004 for the owner of the equity I
of redemption.
` 3. On February 27, 2004 the Defendant took an appeal to the Second
Circuit Court of Appeals. Said appeal is pending before said honorable court. L
4. Said application is being made pursuant to F.R.C.F’. 62. {
5. The Defendant maintains that according to F.F2.C.P. Rule 26lf) the
Defendant is entitled to a stay of execution inasmuch as it would be accorded the I
LAW OFFICES · O'BRIEN, SHAFNER, STUART, KELLY B4 MORRIS, P.C. Q
P.O. BOXBIO • NORWICH. CONNECTICUT 06350 • BSO-889-3855 • FAX:B60-BBB-6352 • JURIS NUMBER 4l2l'/6 7
* .... - ·r
TTT`? f;.g.T..QQ ..._. QQ.,Qc_,.__;,c,, -

I I I ' ase 3:03-cv-O1O¤{32§RU Document 28 Filed O3/1<8/§OO4 Page 2 of 3
judgment debtor had the action been maintained in the Superior Court for the State 1
j of Connecticut. See, Connecticut Practice Book Section 61-11(a). Said section
j provides in pertinent part as follows: ”|f an appeal is filed, such proceeding shall be
stayed until the final determination of the cause". This section applies to mortgage
foreclosures. Hartford Nat'! Bank and Trust Co. v. Tucker, 181 Conn. 296 (1980); W
@·mers and Mechanics Savings Bank v. Sullivan, 216 Conn. 341 (1990). `
6. Additionally, the Defendant submits that it is not being harmed
inasmuch as at the current time there is no equity in the property. `
7. The Defendant continues to pay the mortgage payments and on
information and belief continues to make the weekly ordered payments arising from _
the original judgment. I
8. This Court has discretion to determine the amount of any bond. In I
light of the lack of equity the defendant moves that the bond requirement be ~
waived. I
` THE DEFENDANT J
I
By I
Lloyd L. Langhammer for O’Brien, Shafner,
Stuart, Kelly & Morris, P.C.
138 Main Street `
Post Office Box 310
Norwich, CT 06360
n _ ct 01508 I
LAW OFFICES • O'BRIEN, SHAFNER, STUART, KELLY 8: MORRIS, P.C.
P.O. BOX BIO · NORWICH,CONNECT|CUT 05360 · 860-889-3855 · FAX:B60-866-6352 · JURIS NUMBER 412176 I

J " ' ase 3:03-cv-O1OA<3¢SR-U Document 28 Filed O3/16/$004 Page 3 of 3
S CERTIFICATION OF SERVICE
l l hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing has been mailed, postage
l d h 17hd f|\/l h2004 hfll
{ prepai on t is t ay o arc to t e 0 owing:
l
` Christopher G. Winans, Esquire
l Sullivan, Biraglia, Winans & Eberhard
1 24 Shelter Rock Road
P. O. Box 2809
Danbury, CT 06813-2809
l\/ls. Cynthia Trayner
13 Westside Drive, #94
N. Grosvenordale, CT 06255
By
· Lloyd . Langhammer for O'Brien, Shatner, J
Stuart, Kelly & Morris, P.C.
ct 01508
l
U F:\USEFlS\BEH\Traynar\I LAW OFFICES • O'BRIEN, SHAFNER, STUART, KELLY 8: MORRIS, P.C. i
P.O. BOXBIO • NORWICH.CO|jJNECTICUT 05360 · BGO·B89·3B5$ · FAX: B60—8S6—6352 • JURIS NLIMBER412176 I