Free Order on Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

I F _ ase 3 O3-cv-0106-SBPCD Document 33 Filed 12/09/$003 Page 1 of 1 I
g `__1_ yy) (YI"
5 I
ttl
- l
Q if L. E. U I
E ... I , I
L 'F *;.1; `*i-, PTC I
g UNITED STATES DISTRICT CIOIJRT " “" M dj I
gv DISTRICT OF CDNNECTICIJT miss. ea; COLIEVIF I
.g hl€I*: al. -III· rl. I
IQ CL=FToN S. FREEDMAN, ; I
Plaintiff, : I
JE VS I S CIVIIQACTION No.
.g e 30sCV S (PCD) I
g A ERICA ONLINE, INC., ; I
A TH E TOWN OF FAIRFIELD, ;
$5 DETECTIVE WILLIAM YOUNG, ; I
3S an I DETECTIVE DAVID BENSEY, ; I
Q Defendants. : DECEMBER 2, 2003
Cl
O .
‘E
;§ MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME
.¤
Q The undersigned defendants hereby move for an enlargement of time until I
G.)
IE`.; De Ixember 24, 2003 in which to file an Objection to Plaintiffs Motion for Partial
M l
§ Ju ggment On The Pleadings And/Or Partial Summary Judgment dated I
A l
E No rember 18, 2003. The undersigned represents that this is the defendants' first
S
§ request for additional time and that more time is needed for the undersigned to
E asult with his clients prior to filing an Objection. I
.2 ;;,,__
§ fx il-? f?--ij‘·§T.APursuant to Local Rule of Civil Prodcedure 7(b), contact was made with I
:>¢ AJ., ‘ I ·
0 ,_ A
§ Ziff; °“=lplaI·nt_iff‘s counsel, Daniel J. Klau, and counsel for the co-defendant, Collin I
cl £"L"’" r' I
ig RjII?hing, and they have no objection to this enlargement of time.
E _ r:Zi§‘ ag
§§
A9 ra .
' VJ

cl gi .
U E I g`
_ ••-• I
§ @0 I3
0 3 I
5.* E x l
I I
I