Free Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

.7 rrrrrrr .. --...-——. ;...... .. ... ,,_,__III,.|.|I __ , _I________ __ m_j
I I Case 3:03-cv-OO630—II%JS Document 78 Filed 10/28I2004 Paget of 3
. Q IJ
-
I
I I I]? Ifjii I
I j - I jj j;-I
I . . I II II) A W1 ·.
j I· ~ ~ -· I - U. ;`,‘ _ ; j- `_"<·I.—_¢-"‘\ s(,£?_j;IQ ‘
I . I eA I
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUIIT I I “ j I · QQ
_ DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT I I
MARIO RICHARDS 2 CIVIL AIZTION NO.
PLAINTIFF : 3:03 cv00p30 (DJ S) I
Z I
V. : I
: I I
COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION : I
DEFENDANT :
: OCTOBEII 27, 2004
I I
,5 I I
MOTION FOR EN RGEMENT OF TIM j
j IY _ ~ I I
Plaintiff requests an enlargement of time to November I , 2004 within which to I
submit a joint proposed scheduling order for court approval. is is the first request for
I
enlargement in this matter. I
I I
Procedural Background
Plaintiff commenced this action on or about April 7, 20I)3 pursuant to the Fair
Labor Standards Act (29 U.S.C. 201 et seq.), claiming wages oIwed for overtime hours
worked. The plaintiff filed ajmotion fer class certification on I I I
2003. On September 28, 2004 the court; granted plaintiffs motIon thereby certifying the I
I I
matter as a class action on behalf of level I & II customer supp rt analysts. The court
ordered the parties to submit a proposed amended scheduling o der by October 28,
I
2004.
I
I I
I I
I I
I
BARTINIK, GIANACOPLOS. BARTINIK. BARTINIK E: RATER, P.C. I
R0. ¤¤x942. • GROTION. c0NN¤J¢:T|cuTOBS40-0942 • 860-445-B52jI`i!1uR|s NUMBER Oizm
4;a.a.T..:.·.;·-.~-j-»---~-·- .. .. jj __ jj __ jj __ jj jj jj jj - » `, ,.- _.¤;s:;;s;,;:s::_-<;.rgag4:lI¤;1»;we;,·c-.:;·.=·E-;¤§·—,» •,·€x=z—s.¤¤¤r¤:.-w;`¤;.,.,,..,;.,.,_. ’ ‘ j -
j j I I I I I I I I IIIIIII
.·.· ja; j-I, ,-_- jg, gjj. -j. jj - jj jj jj jj jj __ jj __ jj I I I I I I I I I I I
jj jj jj jj jj -- »»—~.¤au.E.e$HeKr»qa;a¤.e
ijijijjjjjjjjjrrjjjjjjj I I I I I I I I I I IIIIII
j-I; j-_- jg, j._. gjj. - lj. ..jj jj jj jj jj __ jj __ jj jj jj I I I I I I I I I I I I I

! E i
K Case 3:03-cv—OO63?=l%JS Document 78 Filed 10/28¥BO4 Page 2 of 3
l l .
l l l
l a
T l
Reasons for Enlargement l {
l
Counsel for the parties have engaged in numerous discinssions regarding the
proposed scheduling order, however, due to recent scheduling Fifficulties between
counsel and the complexity of the issues encompassing the sc eduling proposal, the R
parties require additional time within which to submit a propo al to the court. l
Position of Opposing Counsel l - I
l l
Defendant is in agreement with this request.
l
l l
l l
. , l ]
Plamtiff
Mario Ric ards `
l
` l
By
rchael J. M y, ct17841
Bartinik, Gi acoplos, Bartinik, I
Bartinik & ater, P.C. E
100 Fort ill aaa.
Groton, CT 0§340
Tel: (860) 44lS 8521 _
Fax: (860) 4%-5873
l
~ l
m
q l
II l l
l l
BARTINIK. GLANAGIOPLOS, BAFITINIK. BARTINIK Sr jRATE.R. P.C.
RO. BOX 942 • GROTON. CONNI£CTICUT • 880-445-$2.1 • JUFI15 NUMBER OIZZD 2
_________,.._,,- ...... . '`'' `_|

0 ..-_- ..... -.......n..............._ 00000 _0________ __ _ IT-
0 U Case 3:03-cv-0O630;_DJS Document 78 Filed 10/28 2004 Page 3 of 3 0
0 ; <. _> nay 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 1
0
0 0
CEKQQIFICATION 0 {
0
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing was mailed on /%.2yO Yto:
Tasos C. Paindiris Esq. 0
William Anthony, Esq. 0 0
Jackson Lewis 0
55 Farmington Avenue Suite 1200 0
Hartford, CT 06105 0
Tel: (860) 522-0404 0 0
Fax: (860) 247-1330 0 0
Michae J. Mell
0 0
0
0 0 0
0 0
0
0
0 0
0 .
0
0
0 0
0
0 0
0 0
0 0
l 0
0
0

BARTINIK, GlANA¢OPl..OS, BARTINIK, BARTINIK G: TRATER, P.C.
RO. BOX942 • GROTON, CONNR§CTlCUT • 960-445-B52I • JURIS NUMBEROIZZO
.... ..l...0 .. 0