Free Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Motion - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

Case 3:03-cv-00644-CFD Document 135 Filed 11/10/2005 Page 1 of 4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
BRUCE CHARLES RYAN, RUSSELL WILLIAM )
NEWTON, IROBERT FITZPATRICK, and MERIT ) CASE NUMBER:
CAPITAL ASSOCIATES, INC., ) 3:03 CV 00644 (CFD)
)
Plaintiffs, )
)
vs. )
)
NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE )
COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA., and )
AIG TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC., )
)
Defendants. )
DAVID W. GWYNN, RAQUEL GWYNN AND )
GWYNN FINANCLAL SERVICES, INC. ) CASE NUMBER:
) 3:03 CV 1154 (CFD)
Plaintiffs, )
)
vs. )
)
NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE )
COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA., and )
AIG TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC., ) November 10, 2005
)
Defendants. )
MOTION ON CONSENT FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
Defendants National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa. and AIG
Technical Services, Inc., now known as AIG Domestic Claims, Inc. ("AIGTS") (hereinafter
referred to collectively as "National Union"), by their attorneys Finn Dixon & Herling LLP,
hereby respectfully move this Court pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 6(b)(l) and D. CONN. L. CIV. R.
7(b)(3) for an extension of time of 7 days, to and including November 17, 2005 to respond to ‘
{00170389; lg 00400;

Case 3:03-cv-00644-CFD Document 135 Filed 11/10/2005 Page 2 of 4
Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel Discovery and for Sanctions dated September 28, 2005. In support
of this motieian, undersigned counsel states as follows:
1. This is Defendants’ second request for an extensio:n of time with regard to this
time limitation.
2. Counsel for Defendants has spoken to counsel for the Ryan plaintiffs who consent
to the reque$ted extension.
3. i The requested extension is necessary to research adequately and respond
appropriately to the broad—based motion filed by plaintiffs.
4. Due to the complex nature of this matter, defendants require additional time to
respond.
For the reasons stated above, National Union respectfully requests that this Court grant a
7 day extension of time, to and including November 17, 2005 to respond to Plaintiffs’ Motion to
Compel Discovery and For Sanctions dated September 28, 2005.
{00170389; 1; 0040-3}

Case 3:03-cv-00644-CFD Document 135 Filed 11/10/2005 Page 3 of 4
DEFENDANTS NATIONAL UNION FIRE
INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, A.
and AIG TE -· ICAL SERVICES, n
J ’
Byr li! { I Z
J - · " . Hawkins H (ct00128)
* = M. Tong (ct25304)
. Dixon & Herling LLP
O e Landmark Square, Suite 1400
Stamford, CT 06901-2689
T¤1; (203) 325-5000
Fax: (203) 348-5777
Email: [email protected]
{00170389; 1; 0040—3}

Case 3:03-cv-00644-CFD Document 135 Filed 11/10/2005 Page 4 of 4
CERTIFICATION
This is to certify that a twe and correct copy of the foregoing was sent by United
States mail,giirst class, postage prepaid to the following this 10th day of November, 2005:
Peter M. Nolin, Esq.
Jay H. Sandak, Esq.
Sandak Hennessey & Greco LLP
707 Summer Street
Stamford, CT 06905
(203) 425-4200
(203) 325-8608 (fax)
Mario DiNatale, Esq.
Jonathan M. Levine, Esq.
Silver Golub & Teitell LLP
184 Atlantic Street
Stamford, CT 06904
(203) 325-4491
(203) 325-3769 (fax)
/ .
. Hawkins H
{00170389; 1; 0040-3}