Free Motion to Dismiss - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut


File Size: 42.9 kB
Pages: 3
Date: December 31, 1969
File Format: PDF
State: Connecticut
Category: District Court of Connecticut
Author: unknown
Word Count: 403 Words, 2,564 Characters
Page Size: 611 x 792 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ctd/23015/205.pdf

Download Motion to Dismiss - District Court of Connecticut ( 42.9 kB)


Preview Motion to Dismiss - District Court of Connecticut
Case 3:03-cv-00644-CFD Document 205 Filed 08/29/2006 Page 1 of 3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
BRUCE CHARLES RYAN, RUSSELL WILLIAM )
NEWTON, ROBERT FITZPATRICK, and MERIT ) CIVIL ACTION NO.
CAPITOL ASSOCIATES, INC. ) 3:03 CV 00644 (CFD)
Plaintiffs, )
)
)
vs. )
)
NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE )
COMPANY OP PITTSBURGH, PA., and )
AIG TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC., )
Defendants )
)
DAVID W. GW Y NN and RAQUEL GWYNN ) CIVIL ACTION NO.
Plaintiffs, ) 3:03 CV 01154 (CFD)
)
)
vs. )
)
NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE )
COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA., and )
AIG TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC., )
Defendants )
) AUGUST 25, 2006
THE GWYNN PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO DISMISS COUNT TWO OF DEFENDANTS’
SECOND AMENDED COUNTERCLAIM
The Plaintiffs David W. Gwynn and Raquel Gwynn ("the Gwynn plaintiffs"), through
counsel, hereby respectfully move, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. l2(b)(6) and Local Rule 7, to
dismiss Count Two ("Unjust Enrichment") of Defendants’ Second Amended Counterclairn
Against the Gwynn Plaintiffs, dated August 3, 2006, for failure to state a claim upon which relief
can be granted. Defendants can prove no set of facts to support a claim for unjust enrichment.

Case 3:03-cv-00644-CFD Document 205 Filed 08/29/2006 Page 2 of 3
Moreover, unjust enrichment is an equitable remedy that is only available in the absence of a
contract, and defendants plead the existence of an express contract.
ln support of this Motion to Dismiss, the Gwynn plaintiffs refer the Court to co-plaintiffs’
Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion to Dismiss, dated May 5, 2006, addressing
defendants’ claim for unjust enrichment, which the Gwynn plaintiffs adopt and rely upon as their
own.
WHEREFORE, plaintiffs respectfully request that the Court dismiss Count Two of
Defendants’ Second Amended Counterclaim Against the Gwynn Plaintiffs, dated August 3,
2006.
PLAINTIFFS, DAVID GWYN N and
RAQUEL GWYNN
I
By__ ___
Mario DiNatale (ct 12449)
Silver Golub & Teitell, LLP
184 Atlantic Street
Stamford, CT 06904
(203) 325-4491
(203) 325-3769 (Fax)
[email protected]
2

Case 3:03-cv-00644-CFD Document 205 Filed 08/29/2006 Page 3 of 3
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
THIS IS TO CERTIFY that a copy of the foregoing was sent via U.S. Mail, postage
prepaid, as well as electronically, on this 25* day of August, 2006, to:
Mark B. Seiger, Esq.
Edwards Angell Palmer & Dodge LLP
90 State House Square
Hartford, CT 06103
Peter M. Nolin, Esq.
Sandak Hennessey & Greco LLP
707 Summer Street
Stamford, CT 06905
/ W /, .i......_, __
MARIO DiNATALE I
3