Free Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut


File Size: 76.2 kB
Pages: 4
Date: December 31, 1969
File Format: PDF
State: Connecticut
Category: District Court of Connecticut
Author: unknown
Word Count: 640 Words, 4,013 Characters
Page Size: 610 x 790 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ctd/23015/234.pdf

Download Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut ( 76.2 kB)


Preview Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut
Case 3:03-cv-00644-CFD Document 234 Fileol 12/05/2006 Page 1 of 4

_ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT _
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
BRUCE CHARLES RYAN, RUSSELL WILLIAM )
NEWTON, ROBERT FITZPATRICK, and ) CASE NUMBER: I
MERIT CAPITAL ASSOCIATES, INC., ) 3:03 CV 00644 (CFD)
. )
Plaintiffs, ) y
) l
v. ) .
)
NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE ) `
COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA., and )
AIG TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC., )
) E
Defendants, ) E
)
DAVID W. GWYNN and RAQUEL GWYNN, ) 1
) CASE NUMBER: ,
Plaintiffs, ) 3:03 CV 1154 (CFD) l
v. )
)
NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE ) »
COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA., and ) l
AIG TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC., ) l
Defendants. ) DECEMBER 5, 2006
MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE RESPONSE TO THE
RYAN PLAINTIFFS’ MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITIONTO DEFENDANTS’
, MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 6(b) and Local Rule 7(b) the Defendants, National Union
Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA and AIG Technical Services, Inc., through the l
l
· l
undersigned counsel, hereby respectfully move for an extension of time of twenty (20) days, up
l
through and including December 26, 2006, to tile a response to T he Ryan PIaintM`$’
l
Memorandum in Opposition to Dejkndants ’ Motion for Summary Judgment (hereinafter referred
to as "Opposi2‘ion.") In support of this motion, the undersigned counsel aver as follows:
l l7l822_l

Case 3:03-cv-00644-CFD Document 234 Filed 12/05/2006 Page 2 of 4
l. Defendants filed their Motion for Summary Judgment and incorporated memorandum of
law in support thereof on August 17, 2006.
2. The Ryan Plaintiffs tiled their Opposition on November 20, 2006. l
3. Defendants intend to file a response to the Opposition that will address the arguments
raised by the Ryan Plaintiffs therein, and that Defendants believe will be informative to the Court
as it prepares to rule on the pending Motion for Summary Judgment.
4. This is the first request for extension of time made by Defendants with respect to the
deadline for tiling a response.
5. Counsel to Plaintiffs in this case consent to the requested extension.
WHEREFORP, Defendants hereby respectfully request that the Court grant this motion
and extend the deadline by which Defendants must file a response to the Ryan Plaintiffs’
Opposition by twenty (20) days up through and including December 26, 2006.
l l7l822_l

I
Case 3:03-cv-00644-CFD Document 234 Filed 12/05/2006 Page 3 of 4 I
_ I
3 t
I
DEFENDANTS/COUNTERPLAINTIF FS
NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE I
COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA. I
and AIG TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC.
I
By: /d/ David S. Samuels I
Donna M. Greenspan I
. Florida Bar No.: 0591 10 I
Edwards Angell Palmer & Dodge, LLP
One North Clematis Street, Suite 400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401 I
Tel: (561) 833-7700
Fax: (561) 655-8719
Email: [email protected]
Mark B. Seiger
Fed. Bar No. ct05580
David S. Samuels
Fed. Bar No. ct 24460
Edwards Angell Palmer & Dodge, LLP
90 State House Square
Hartford, CT 06103-2715
Tel: (860) 525-5065 l
Fax: (860) 527-4198 A
Email: [email protected]
[email protected]
John D. Hughes
Massachusetts BBO # 243660
Edwards Angell Palmer & Dodge, LLP
1 1 I Htmtington Avenue I
Boston, MA 02199
Tel: (617) 951-3373
Fax: (617) 439-4170
Email: [email protected]
‘ mszzgi

Case 3:03-cv-00644-CFD Document 234 Filed 12/05/2006 Page 4 of 4
E
CERTIFICATION
I hereby certify that on December 5, 2006, a copy ofthe foregoing document was filed
electronically and served by mail on anyone unable to accept electronic tiling. Notice of this
tiling will be sent by e—mail to all parties by operation of the Court’s electronic tiling system or
by mail on anyone unable to accept electronic tiling. Parties may access this tiling through the
Court’s system. ·
l
/d/ David S. Samuels i
` David S. Samuels
l
l
1
E
l
.
l
l
l
. l
l
l
l
l
' l
l

171822il
2