Free Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Motion - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut


File Size: 49.8 kB
Pages: 1
Date: March 17, 2004
File Format: PDF
State: Connecticut
Category: District Court of Connecticut
Author: unknown
Word Count: 394 Words, 2,843 Characters
Page Size: 612.72 x 1008 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ctd/23015/27.pdf

Download Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Motion - District Court of Connecticut ( 49.8 kB)


Preview Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Motion - District Court of Connecticut
I III IIII I `“'` I ````` "`“`“ '“""i:
I W&‘·CIase 3:03Zcv-00644§CFD Document 27 Filed 03/16/2004 Page 1 of 1 I
I · I · ' I AL __0. .-\ I
I UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
I DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
I ————----——---—-———------———----———----———-—--———---—-—---——--- X
BRUCE CHARLES RYAN, RUSSELL WILLIAM : I
I NEWTON, ROBERT FITZPATRICK, and MERIT : CASE NUMBER: _.
I CAPITAL ASSOCIATES, INC., : 3:03 CV 00644 (CFD) I
I II Plaintiffs, ‘‘’I
I vs.
I NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE I {QQ @2
COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA., and : as BTI ‘
AIG TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC., : March 1, 2004 r;jj}5_ 3;*
¤ ".?;l`£¥ri Qs
_ Defendants. : Ea T0
u _________________________________________ _ ______________ __ _____ X ECD vi T7
EFI at wi} -—‘"=
*1;,; ` · ..-I II.; `°
_ ‘ In.; MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME IN WHICH TO REPLY TO PLATVl3lTI@`S’ . _
’ I *35; OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS I I
QQ I gpefendants National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA ("National Union") and
2;;;: IA
JI Technical Services, Inc. ("AIGTS”) (hereinafter referred to collectively as "Nationa1
rg}? lII·_LJ1I;ii·on") hereby respectfully move pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b)(l) and D. Conn. L. Civ. R.
Ein ts
r §'I(?§`(3) for an extension of time to reply to Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to
5} ` E
M ._,B@niss, currently due on March 2, 2004. Defendants move that the Court extend the time for
ti-:.} alma
I such reply until such time that a similar reply shall be due in the companion case of Gwynn, at
i I I .:1/., v. Nag"g)nal’_+§_lni0n, et al., Docket Number 3:03 CV 01154 (CFD) ("Gwynn") pursuant to
. · I
@nda1£;IIIs’ for Status Conference and Coordinated Scheduling Order, filed concurrently
LM rr ei
I_j1_elpwith_,_-ffor liieasons stated therein. In the alternative, National Union moves for an
; e¤··=··· C: Q; ,..51
I Egpnsioiztof reply to the Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss until
March 3'IIIIE; II
In support of this motion, undersigned counsel states as follows: I
{00062092; l; 0040-3} I
I
mr - —— - -- Le LL ' ` ’ ‘ r · F - --*
....2. -. .. ` “ c" rr ·· —— mr -- -.--; ;.;.;f_;‘jjf,
` ”T`T`N’n———~ - —— me - -- . -- -- ·e·e-e-e
.-...4 e. .. . I TI "I "` rr rr —-- —-—- --- Q L;.;`i.;T;Qf_