Free Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

. IL- ,»» .. ...... -....L.h-.._-..C_....—_..._.—».....—.._»-..——...........-|I 4...—.—........_..»..—.-....__—...._.._
Case 3:03-cv-00644-CFD Document 67 Filed 1 1/22 2004 Page 1 of 4
I ILED A
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COU * it
DISTRICT CIF CONNECTICUT l
[ ZUUU ·l 22 P I= 50
BRUCE CHARLES RYAN, RUSSELL WILLIAM )
[ , NEWTON, Roesnr FITZPATRICK, and Msarr ) GIBI _·*•T¥1t1$N EOURT
{ cA1>1ro1. Assocmrns, mc. ) 3 :05% I li6§4%£lc@`r3)
)
· Plaintiffs, )
l )
l > I
I vs. )
1 I
NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE ) `
{ COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA., and ) li
{ AIG TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC., )_ `
)
Defendants )
DAVID W. GWYNN, RAQUEL GWYNN AND ) E
GWYNN FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. ) CIVIL [ CTION NO.
) 3:03 C 01154 (CFD)
Plaintiffs, )
)
vs. )
)
NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE . )
COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA., and )
AIG TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC., )
)
Defendants )
INOVE Y BER 18, 2004
MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIM;
‘ II
Plaintiffs David Gwynn, Raquel Gwynn, and Gwynn Finanei Services (hereinafter
referred to collectively as "Plaintiffs") respectihlly move, pursuant to ed. R. Civ. P. 6(b)( 1) and
D. Conn. L. Civ. R. 7(b)(3) for an extension oftime up to and includiw g December 15, 2004 to
respond and/or object to Defendants’ First Request for Production of ocuments dated October
I3, 2004. In support of this Motion, undersigned counsel states as fol ows:
anP'YYYYYL`Y.l`T.l`C.Q‘i_QT_g‘i_gi__,__(__

j . . ~ Case 3:03-cv-00644-CFD Document 67 Filed 1 1/22 2004 Page 2 of 4 {
1. This is the second request for an extension of time to resp? d andfor object to
Defendants’ First Request for Production of Documents.
2. Defendants have served plaintiffs with 65 separate docum nt production requests.
Including sub-parts, there are a total of 140 separate requests for doc ents that require response
andfor objection.
3. Plaintiffs reside in the State of Arizona. Because ofthe di tance involved, it becomes
a more difficult and complicated procedure for counsel to review the equests with plaintiffs and
determine the appropriate response.
4. The undersigned counsel has contacted James R. Hawkins II, Esq., counsel to
defendants, and he has consented to this motion. I
5. The time to which an extension is sought- December 15, 2 O4- is the same date that
counsel to co—plaintiffs has soughtto file responses and/or objections o defendants’ requests.
Accordingly, for the reasons stated above, plaintiffs respectful y request that the Court
grant an extension of time to and including December 15, 2004, for p intiffs to respond and/or
obj ect to Defendants’ First Request for Production of Documents. M I
1

`N
l . . 4 . Case 3:03-cv-00644-CFD Document 67 Filed 11/22 2004 Page 3 of 4 {
PLAINTIFFS, DAVID GWYNN, RAQUEL
GWYNN AND GWY I FINANCIAL
SERVICES, INC. N
By -·"" l
rio DiNatalc ct 12449)
Jonathan M. Le i ne (ct 07584)
Silver Golub & eitell, LLP
184 Atlantic Str t
Stamford, CT 06 04
(203) 325-4491
(203) 325—3769 ll ax)
Email: ]MDim>.ta · s tlawxzom
J`Levinc { J. ; ‘1aw.com
l l

0 ---· Case 3:03-cv-00644-CFD Document 67 Filed 11/22 2004 Page 4 of 4 I
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
TI-IIS IS TO CERTIFY that a copy of the foregoing was U.S.=q ail on this 18* day of
November, 2004, postage prepaid, to: S
James R. Hawkins, II, Esq. S
Finn Dixon & Herling LLP ’
One Landmark Square
Stamford CT 06901
Peter M. Nolin, Esq. q
Sandak Hennessey & Greco LLP
970 Summer Street q
Stamford, CT 06905
MARIO DiNA”[ii LE
|·