Free Order on Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

I A I __I
I .I I .
Case-3;O3_CV_OO649_ , Document 20 |ZI|gg| /25/2 4 PEIQG 1 of 1 I
H I _ I
a E I I
I ij I
,-2 UNITED STATED DISTRICT Q OURT I
_q_ - DISTRICT OF CONNECTHI I
<> I . A
Q I I IVEILA VEYONNE ADAMS, )
F; ‘ Rnrnonv 1.. CERRETA, ) I
·g : $}ALVATORE SAM DIBENEDETTO, ) {__)
I1] A A HOWARD DUBMAN, )
,., _ PETER FONDACO, ) Ii. I · Q
AE ‘ QLORLA ANNETTE PEARSON JENKINS, ) CIVIL A TION NO U A;-gej ··AI ??’ ·
;I’·· * ARA ANNE JOHNSON, ) 303 CV (JBA) Q} QQ}
.¤— . SEPH A. LATTINI, ) U Z
= SSIE M. MAYES, Individually and as ) 2.-;- ` ··‘'
I; __ ` presentative of HENRY FOSTER MAYES,) 5 IF`?
H Q gd ARTHUR J. SMITH, ) Iii I
4J I •v ) I
E A 5 " Plaintiffs, )
rn S· )
·•-I
ti I )
rETLEY USA, I
. .. TIT: if T-·t
I f""-» `
tg gi Ii; jg I`". Defendant. ) MARCH , 2004
EF ,,,,,_____l ug:) _· ·
ui " Ti? UNOPPOSED MOTION
:5 gg "“" Q-fj ·? TO MODIFY THE SCHEDULIN RDER
¤
Tg Purstlanflo Rule 6 of the Federal Rules of Civil Proced - e and D. Conn. L. Civ. R. 7(b), I
.,.| I
TI defendant Tetley USA, Inc. ("Tetley") respectfully requests tha the deadline for filing `
0* I
3 dispositive motions be extended by an additional twenty—one (2 ) days, to and including April 6, I
'· ·r'||
AP BI
§ 2004. As grounds for this motion, Tetley states as follows:
¤ I
8 M. _ l. Pursuant to the order dated February 18, 2004, t ·.¤· deadline for tiling dis ositive
.c: iE:I¤ 4-* p
-I-I ai? III
Iz: mcijtions was March 16, 2004.
A §! JJ
-. I u
E Ei gi 2. The parties have just discovered the existence of dditional documents which may
G ; .
TU I U
E [JI be Eelevant to the issues raised in Tetley’s motion for summary j dgment.
C IU; · lll Z
0 ,QI Q t> '
*2 sl E A I
A- SQ e 4-I `
g cn rd
~·-. rn *¤ I
2 fl; H ll ‘ I
·-A-. >¢ ‘ £—¢ at I
m wi H D __ I
L_ lIlIlIl'l'l'l'l'l"l"l`l`
A AII.-
AA A A AAA.-