Free Status Report - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut


File Size: 41.5 kB
Pages: 3
Date: December 31, 1969
File Format: PDF
State: Connecticut
Category: District Court of Connecticut
Author: unknown
Word Count: 399 Words, 2,387 Characters
Page Size: 611 x 792 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ctd/23036/71.pdf

Download Status Report - District Court of Connecticut ( 41.5 kB)


Preview Status Report - District Court of Connecticut
Case 3:03-cv-00665-IVIRK Document 71 Filed 10/18/2006 Page 1 of 3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT .
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
ppl., E . ’.2 z
HENDERSON
VS. 3:03CV665 MRK
GREENWICH
Ogt 0 Qs we 1%, loote-
STATUS REPORT
A. Nature of the Case
1.(P), Henderson, on or about December 20,2001 at approximately
6:20 p.m. on Greenwich Avenue, Greenwich, Connecticut was illegally stopped
due to the ethnicity of his race in conformance with a custom policy or practice
of the (D),Town of Greenwich, it’s agents, servants or employees-(D), Town of
Greenwich, it’s agents, servants or employees, did not posses specific facts that
a crime had been, was being or was about to be committed. The Town of
Greenwich, it’s agents, servants or employees, tmnecessary and oppressive
behavior subiected (P) Henderson, to (10) months of unlawful prosecution based
on a egregious 911 complaint which resulted in the case being dismissed due to
police misconduct.
B. Discovery
LCOLLATERAL ESTOPPEL- A doctrine whereby issues litigated
and determined in a prior proceeding are binding upon all subsequent litigation
between the parties regarding that issue.

Case 3:03-cv-00665-IVIRK Document 71 Filed 10/18/2006 Page 2 of 3
2.CONCISE RULE OF LAW: The constitutionality of an oflicial act
may not be relitigated in a 1983 action after having been litigated in federal
court.
3.CONCISE RULE OF LAW: The defendant may not deny allegations
in the complaint on the basis of lack of information and belief if the information
is within the actual knowledge of the defendant. Because the denial was to
matters which would be within the actual knowledge of the Town of Greenwich
(D), the denial raises no issue and is, in effect, an admission of the truth ofthe
allegations in the complaint.
4.No action has been taken by the parties or the Court for six (6)
months.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,
Terrence Henderson, Pro Se
5360 Broadway #70
Bronx, NY 10463

Case 3:03-cv-00665-IVIRK Document 71 Filed 10/18/2006 Page 3 of 3
CERTIFICATION
This is to certify that a copy ofthe foregoing has been mailed on the above—captioned
date:
to all counsel and pro se parties of record:
Valerie E. Maze, Esq.
Attorneys for Defendant
TOWN OF GREENWICH
Greenwich Town Attorney’s Office
Town Hall, P.O. Box 2540
Greenwich, CT 06836-2540
Terence Henderson, Pro Se
5360 Broadway #7c
Bronx, NY 10463