Free USCA Mandate - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut


File Size: 66.2 kB
Pages: 1
Date: January 11, 2006
File Format: PDF
State: Connecticut
Category: District Court of Connecticut
Author: unknown
Word Count: 370 Words, 2,285 Characters
Page Size: 612.72 x 1008 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ctd/23045/44.pdf

Download USCA Mandate - District Court of Connecticut ( 66.2 kB)


Preview USCA Mandate - District Court of Connecticut
S mi
` T Case 3:03-QI!-00674-WWE D THWGJSSMMIRSSESE $*333% HOUSE ( i
, Wt: lm U: l I I i `
S ( R0searz1L2:£I{acKechnie ` p Ago
A ( A ( fi" r ~ · isms at i
Date: 12/23/05 ,5 BEC Z 3 (ap
J` \.
Docket Number: 05-5468-cv _ _,;°”¤ 5. .*.i¤ri Short Title: Schirillo v. Stratford ECOND ciP·0°
T DC Docket Number: 03-cv-674 1 E 1
DC: DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT (NEW HAVEN) ,.,1. A i
DC Judge: Honorable Warren Eginton R M gi); ‘ (
r 1 I ,1- Zij i
At a stated term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, fheld at the Tljurgood 1
Marshall United States Courthouse, Foley Square, in the City of New York, on the 23rd dayrof December, f
two thousand five. H I :_ T1" ````' i
. 1 'iifi {ji
Richard Schirillo, Augusto Correia and Ronald Brenton, ` N
Plaintiffs-Appellants, [1 N
V 1
‘ T i
Town of Stratford, Eileen Murphy, I/O, Michael Feeney, I/O, Dorinda Borer, I/O, Mark Barnhart,
_ i/O, and Jack Obemessor, I/O, _ . _
Defendants—Appe||ees, ‘ ` _ i
The Civil Appeals Management P/an of this court directs that within the (10) days after tiling a Notice of
Appeal, the appellant shall file and serve a Pre-Argument Statement (FORM C), order a transcript of the
proceedings from the court reporter and file and serve a statement concerning same (FORM D), pay docketing
fee, and that in the event of default of any of these requirements the Clerk may dismiss the appeal without i
further notice. 1 1 (
- i
The appellant herein not having so proceeded, upon consideration thereof it is ORDERED that the appeal i
from the order of 9/ 1.5/05 United States Court for the District of Connecticut be, and it hereby is ‘
_ DISMISSED. Any motions pending prior to the entry of this order of dismissal are deemed MOOT.
CERTIFIED: 1
` n ' ` I I,. \ `,, ` ,/
nmeecsri ,25}% ,
`= E I ` 1
”"“”‘ °”'° Fonseca, _
_ i f Q1.; { (U seann,_B{ Macliechnie, Clerk
` www Gm! 1 ,5 ·ie‘ii ‘ MJ ,7- E- I ·
‘ ‘ (*1%;;, Julius D. CI'OCk`W€ll· i
I eputy Clerk
r . 1.»-{eve;-e¤·;: _- rr ir _-37:3-7 7- T _ i _ §_K_ 7