Free USCA Mandate - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

__.; `_g
·_, Case 3:03-cv-00696-JB?% O3/25/2004 0I' com NW `
‘ ‘ ‘- ,,, 2; ish.; · A -
t··<· - **1* PM ` [tl-CV—696 /·°£l(§ I
· rt rterton, J. ' l
_ t
. ii E t,. E. D
United States Court of Appeals _ i .l
.e · l ;:`“" E‘ e GL]
Fonrnn tim ZJ \ jr it -
SECOND CIRCUIT ‘ §..Ul.‘_, ,—·
Wg Ut?. . li-iyit if Q"
` NE'; }~ti\‘·z lli`i= VUm"·
At a stated Term ofthe United States Court of Appeals ifi ir the Second
C1rcu1t, held at the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, at QI lr; ley Square,
111 the City of New York, on the 1arn dayof retmmy two thoues a id four,
_ Present: (
Hon. Anialya L. Kearse, ll: qmr up wr .
Hon. José A. Cabranes, 4:4 t»· L r A
Hon. Robert A. Katzmann, 3, In 18 w
Circuit Judges. | ul j
"· - _
‘llt¤¤,, ,‘ ·ej·l Q ssll S isaa A
•"tl|¥ ""
In re: Anthony Torres, -
Petitioner. 03-3131
.
Petitioner, pro se, has tiled a motion to proceed in forma pauperis and a petitice 1 for a writ of i
mandamus directing the district court to decide his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 compla nit. Upon due
consideration, it is ORDERED that pctit:ioner's motion to proceed informa paigpené .*18 granted for
the purpose of tiling the mandamus petition. It is further ORDERED that petition: t °s mandamus
" petition is DENIED without prejudice to renewal if the district court fails. to |:lce'act1o11 on
_ pe1:itioner’s motions for a temporary restrairiing order and preliminary injunction ~e i atlnn fourteen
(14) days of the entry of this order or fails to decide the other pending matters anal to enter final
judgment widiin ninety (90) days of the entry of this order. t
FOR THE COURT: I
R B. K hnie, Clerk
R TRUE COPY oseaun ac .ec I
Roseau B. Mac:Kec:thnie, CTLEW B ` E ____
by BQDUZLA t
DEPUTY CLERK \
H
usual wm lg mm · }
- I 2004 " l
° ISSUED AS Mnnnnrn; FEB 20 I l
I . .,.._.., -. -··;-Tic;i»‘·;*t~1`$·`.=C=i=z-t`.=;
—7_7-- n .-.4w.m

‘ S ‘ e-n. W. -