Free Order on Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

I ll ”””;“"‘“—‘l_”""‘_‘_""—‘——"r""”‘—""‘——"*·i·"··‘
l Case 3:03-cv-OO7C@·CFD Document 31 Filed O1/O@$O(};¢lg(;t§’lqgej,1,,,{>§,1\.l.} ML
'l jb O
[ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
l I DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
l l
9 l 2 l
I CENTRIX, mc., i ·
l : Civil Action N o. 3:03 (QFD)
’ Plaintilftj ; We pg-; E-’·-E ,
.l - ‘ YE-Q yy.; reg l
i l v. ; ;> `A`l4 lll l
, 1 CQ. ·*"‘ ¤*.Fi¤”}
l l Z “ ·i> ,,,..
I ANDON BRUSH COMPANY, INC., : EjI§~i *7 N
_ Z E; \ w
Defendant. : DECEMBER 23, 2003
¤ i' in 2 I
é l -5 .
$3 . Q I l
:5* • MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO p
S _` PLAINTIFF CENTRIX INC.'S DISCOVERY REQUESTS W
q U ;
,3* l §‘D` m
is ` S `Befendant Andon Brush Company, Inc. ("Andon"), by its undersigned counsel, hereby
Q [.1;.] · l
E · Eshis Court for an extension through and including January 16, 2004 for Andon to respond i
my l
E _ ‘ gtiff Centrix Inc.’s discovery requests as set forth below. In support of its motion Andon l
U I-ill 4;,,;
tates as follows: l
. lf; l
p rl. t¢;,Dcfendant Andon was recently required to change counsel in this action when its
-- r I ria ,l“I--—’ 5 :§’ .
original cotmsel, I-~lVl?c`€arter and English, developed a conflict of interest (by reason of the .
in ` i lf I ill' 5. I l
acquisitionjof a phrtion of Cummings & Lockwood), which required them to withdraw from this _
5; `_``. JY { l
action. l Q `
2. Andon obtained new counsel on approximately November 21, 2003, when they
n engaged Carella, Byrne, Bain, Giliillan, Cecchi, Stewart & Olstein as its lead cotmsel; Shortly J
l
I
l
l l
.`.`.".
7%. —§.—\ YZ _, 7 ' ‘ - - . _