Free Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut


File Size: 123.0 kB
Pages: 4
Date: April 7, 2004
File Format: PDF
State: Connecticut
Category: District Court of Connecticut
Author: unknown
Word Count: 988 Words, 5,922 Characters
Page Size: 612.72 x 1008 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ctd/23074/59.pdf

Download Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut ( 123.0 kB)


Preview Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut
i Case Documggl- Filed O4/072004 'I 1 of 4
i . O .
“ D
l li .
Q UNITED snmrs msrmcr counr , $
msrnrcr on comvscrrcur 250 - gg
{ ——~·——~——·—~——_ V sss‘
[ cnmnrx, mc., E A i i D (W
: Civil Action No. 3:03 CV ·I (CFD) -
Plaintiff, : 2
moon snusn coMi>ANY, mc.,
nereadam. Apn1Zz004 J
l
Morrow Ann cousnnr onnnn Amsnnmo scnsnuuso u · an
This matter having come before the Honorable Christopher F. Dron j, U,.S.D.J. by
telephonic conference call on April 1, 2004, with Arthur T. F attibene, Es ? Fattibene & I
Fattibene, appearing for the plaintiff; and Kenneth L. Winters, Carella, Byrne, i i ain, Giliillan,
Cecchi, Stewart & Olstein, appearing pro hoc vice for the defendant, and good J iuse appearing
Il
for this motion and amending of the scheduling order as discussed in the afor T id conference
call: ,
It is on this _ day of April, 2004: `
a
1. ORDERED that the deposition of Andon Brush Company, c., heretofore
l
scheduled for April 5, 2004, be and is hereby adjourned to a date to be resched i d by counsel
l
which shall be a date after the settlement conference presently scheduled for Ap ?l6, 2004; and
it is further
l
n_ g, i W"`"“"`"'""”’“T“T’“‘"""“"‘”’“`*5”""i ’;`“`é“ ` “"“`”
.... .... ....

r 1 1 `__;"_““_
i Case 3:03-ov-OO70§i§FD Document 59 Filed O4/O?/$004 ' ge 2 of 4
`
` 2. ORDERED that the times for completion of discovery as set fo p in the August
25, 2003 Report Of Pa1ties' Planning Meeting be extended as follows: | R
i a. All discovery, including depositions of expert witnesses pursua io Fed. R. Civ.

P. 26(b) (4) which was to be completed by June 30, 2004 shall be and is here .. lextended until
September 28, 2004; R
b. The depositions of fact witnesses which was to be completed Ap l15, 2004 shall
be and is hereby extended until July 1-3, 2004; I l ·
c. The plaintiffs designation of expert witnesses which it intends t all at trial and
l
providing opposing counsel with reports from retained experts pursuant to d. R. Civ. P.
26(a)(2) which was to be completed by March 1, 2004 shall be and is hereby ex - ded until May ‘
A l
31, 2004. Dcpositions of any such experts which was to be completed by April · 2004 shall be
and is hereby extended until July 28, 2004; | K
d. The defendant's designation of expert witnesses which it intends u all at trial and 1
providing opposing counsel with reports from retained experts pursuant to id. R. Civ. P.
. . l. .
26(a)(2) which was to be completed by May l, 2004 shall be and is hereby ext ded until July
I
29, 2004. Dcpositions of any such experts which was to be completed by June 3 li! 2004 shall be
and is hereby extended until September 28, 2004; and it is further
3. ORDERED that the time for filing dispositive motions which s to be on or
l it
before July 30, 2004 shall be and is hereby extended until October 29, 2004; and ' lis fmther
4. ORDERED that the joint trial memorandum required by the St ing Order on
Trial Memoranda in Civil Cases which was to be filed by August 30, 2004 or w two month
. l .
after a decision is rendered on the filed dispositive motions, whichever is later hall be and 1S
’

Case 3:03-cv-OO70§-QFD Document 59 Filed O4/OZ/$004 'I ge 3 of 4 i
i hereby extended until November 28, 2004 or within two month after a decisi lis rendered on
i the tiled dispositive motions, whichever is later; and it is further | i
l
5. ORDERED that the date by which the case was required to ready for trial
which was to be by September 30, 2004 or thirty days after the filing n} lthe joint trial
memorandum, whichever is later, shall be and is hereby extended until Dec 29, 2004 or
l (
thirty days after the filing of the joint trial menrorandtun, whichever is later; and N N thrther
6. ORDERED that nothing contained herein shall be deemed to pr 1 ude any party .
from seeking further modification of the above schedule based upon the time by dhich decisions }
l
are rendered on any of the motions presently pending in this action. lj J
Elon. Christopher F. Droney, ,.S.D.J. i
The undersigned consent to the form
and entry ofthe foregoing. 1
CENTRIX, INC. ANDON BRUSH COMPA la- mc.
l 1
, [ ` .
By: Arthur T. Fattibene, Esq. CT06916 By: Kenneth L. Winters, Es CT2553
Fattibene & Fattibene Carella, Byrne, Bain, Gilfill l
2480 Post Road Cecchi, Stewart, & Olstein I
Southport, Connecticut 06890 5 Becker Farm Road ‘
(203) 255-4400 (Tel.) Roseland, New Jersey 070 1 »
(203) 259-0033 (Fax.) (973) 994-1700 (Tet.) 1
(973) 994-1744 (Fax.)
Email: kwinters » carellab ur .com
Matthew C. Mason (ct 1529 Ii
Gregory and Adams, P.C. ·
190 Old Ridgefield Road ‘
Wilton, CT 06897
(203) 762-9000 (T61.)
(203) 834-1628 (Fax)
Email: mmason » g e o . •_. ams.com
3 i
ll l

¤ I II' I
N Case 3:03-cv-0070gS-CFD Document 59 Filed O4/O(7/5004 ` ' Q6 4 of 4 I
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
at Hartford
CENTRIX, INC. A
Plaintiff _
v. CASE N0. 3:03 cv (CFD)
Date: April 6, 2 4
ANDON BRUSH COMPANY, INC. >
_ Defendant
__._ I
J I
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I N
The undersigned hereby certifies that on April ·, 2004 a ,
Copy of the following: E N
i
MOTION AND CONSENT ORDER A|\/IENDI I
SCHEDULING ORDER N
was caused to be mailed by first Class mail, postagw§pre—paid,
to Defendant’s counsel at: N;
Kenneth L. Winters, Esq. Mathew C. Mason, ESV
Carella, Byrne, Bain et al Gregory and Adams, N C.
5 Becker Farm Road 190 Old Ridgefield w»ad
Roseland, NJ 07068—l739 Wilton, CT 0689T N
I
{ ' ’I Ii
Arthur T. Fattibiie
I