Free Order - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

1 TT _` “f`———"`"T`__""`“_—"""`——"`_;""““"""“`"`__""——“"“_"` “
Case 3:03-cv-00717-WWE Document 33 Filed 10/28/2004 Page 1 of 1
. . ·e*·· ~· I
I 1
~ I
I I
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT I
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
II RAYMOND PASZKOWSKI, 3 I
__ _ Plaintiff 3
‘ VS· I CIVIL NO.3:03CVOO7I7(W
,0 PHILIP I S WILLIAM KESBARIAN, 3 ..3 .
Q ns Q RYAN O’CONNEL AND : P-? I
_· EDWARD DOBBINS : . `
"— ge Defendants : SEPTEMBER 9, 2004 _ .. .
• · » 1.n 1
rg A - Qi
> E FORM 26(f) ,_ ; I
Q § REVISED REPORT OF PARTIES' PLANNING MEETING ..Q
2 `° = 3 I
. 4* P F-
`§ tig mcg Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b), 26(f) and D. Conn. L. Civ. R. 16, a status conference was held
2 a "
§ on September 8, 2004 before Judge Eginton. The participants were Katrina Engstrom for the plaintiff and
au .1:: ·--..·
§_ Q gg Q Patty G. Swan for the defendants. Pursuant to the order of the court, the parties provide this revised report
Q) ...4 ._
M D Q W ‘ pertaining tothe Case Management Plan:
I
F. DISCOVERY I
I
1. The parties anticipate that discovery will be needed on the following subjects: the force used at
the time of the arrest, the defendants' familiarity with the plaintiff, the plaintiff's prior claim against a
ggpenrising officer of the Shelton Police Department and the extent of injuries to the plaintiff.
I.; nlin . L. 5 iQ2i._;·AII discovery, including depositions of expert witnesses pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(4), will I
5 r :` I..t.I__·; I
_ - g cordpleted (not propounded) by December 1, 2004.
Discovery will not be conducted in phases.
I 4. All depositions of fact witnesses have been completed. I
5. Plaintiff does not intend to call expert witnesses at trial. I
I I
GORDON. MUIR AND FOLEY, LLP, ATTORNEYS AT LAw, HARTFORD SQUARE NORTH, TEN COLUMBUS B0u1.1:vARD. HART1-·o1I:1:•, CT 061064976 I
TELEPHONE IBBO) 525-5301 FACSIMILE (860) 5254849 Jums N0. 24-020 I