Free Jury Verdict - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

. L-.,......—Y,.,.,.._,.t;,..._t_ _ ______t_______
, w Case 3:03-cv-00717-WWE Document 71 Filed 12/15/2005 Page1 of 4 1
° 1
1 Umm Ewen Didriot (htm 1
_ Dwmcz of Gonnescmzxz ‘
, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUB[LgpAy BRHXE U
1 DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT RT
bg ; E i
1 Kwm E Rowe, Olsrk _ gv 1
1 RAYMOND PASZKOWSKI, : 3:O3¤yO0 ) 1
1 Plaintiff : gmmk 1
1 v. : 1
1 WILLIAM KASBARIAN, :
RYAN O’CONNELL and EDWARD DOBBINS, : 1
Defendants : 1
: December 15, 2005 1
SPECIAL VERDICT FORM 1
l. Did the plaintiff prove by a preponderance of the evidence 1
that defendant Kasbarian used excessive force in violation {
of plaintiff’s Fourth Amendment rights? 1
Yes No {t\ 1
2. Did the plaintiff prove by a preponderance of the evidence
that defendant O’Connell used excessive force in violation
of plaintiff’s Fourth Amendment rights?
Yes No DX:
3. Did the plaintiff prove by a preponderance of the evidence
that defendant Dobbins used excessive force in violation of
plaintiff's Fourth Amendment rights?
Yes No ;> If your answer to the above questions is "Yes" as to one, two or
all defendants, please proceed to the next question. If your
answer to the above question is "No" as to all defendants, then ·
your deliberations are at an end. The Foreperson should sign and
date the form of verdict.
a r l I
A Q; Uma Dc*f&‘1Z‘1’5‘OO
` 1
—e————e—1“ - ,.i._
3 — D · I is ;;;;;?‘·=?;i;$€=='¥— ==‘$:5fa.=fs,§»?.}_=·*.%L*‘»;_·;";*é`f·-"L‘—; ,;- :'T-é` Q-_§‘

I .r~ ,
I · II " Case 3:03-cv-00717-WWE Document 71 Filed 12/15/2005 Page 2 of 4 I
I

4. Do you find that the acts or omissions of one, two or all of I
the defendants were a proximate cause of injuries to the I
I plaintiff? I
I Kasbarian Yes No I
I O'Connell Yes No_ I
Dobbins Yes No I
I If you answered “Yes" to as to one, two or all of the defendants I
5 in question 4, you must consider what damages are due the _
I plaintiff as a result of use of excessive force. I
I 5. Under the law as given to you in these instructions, state =
I the amount of compensatory or nominal damages the plaintiff I
I should be awarded: I
I $—...+,...—.ri_l.—.*r.—.._ I
6. You may only assess punitive damages against that defendant I
or those defendants against whom you have awarded g
compensatory or nominal damages. Do you find that an award I
I of punitive damages is appropriate against one, two or all
of the defendants? I
Yes No I
State the amount of punitive damages, if any, you assess against I
one, two or all of the defendants: I
Kasbarian $ I
O'Connell $ I
Dobbins S I
I
I

I
I .; " ' Case 3:03-cv-00717-WWE Document 71 Filed 12/15/2005 Page 3 of 4
1 UhhsdSMmmUMmwk¢G0wN 1
1 vuxwsn STATES orscrnrcw c%$;E*§"" °fC°%§°°’“$G°§;(jBT
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICU " 1
1 .....i..._____________________ Bb nI2RoweJmsH¤ _ 1
RAYMOND PASZKOWSKI, ; 3;%ggv Q 17 ( ) A
1 Plaintiff = 4
1 V. ; 1
i WILLIAM KASBARIAN, 2
‘ RYAN O’CONNELL and EDWARD DOBBINS, :
Defendants ;
: December 15, 2005
SPECIAL VERDICT FORM
l. Did the plaintiff prove by a preponderance of the evidence
that defendant Kasbarian used excessive force in violation
of plaintiff’s Fourth Amendment rights? `
Yes No ;X 2. Did the plaintiff prove by a preponderance of the evidence
that defendant O’Connell used excessive force in violation
of plaintiff’s Fourth Amendment rights?
Yes No J> 3. Did the plaintiff prove by a preponderance of the evidence
that defendant Dobbins used excessive force in violation of
plaintiff’s Fourth Amendment rights?
Yes No ;> If your answer to the above questions is “Yes" as to one, two or
all defendants, please proceed to the next question. If your
answer to the above question is "No" as to all defendants, then
your deliberations are at an end. The Foreperson should sign and
date the form of verdict.

{ Case 3:03-cv-00717-WWE Document 71 Fi|ed12/15/2005 Page40f4
J D *
Q 4. Do you find that the acts or omissions of one, two or all of i
\ the defendants were a proximate cause of injuries to the 2
V plaintiff? i
{ Kasbarian Yes No ;
y O'Connell Yes No y
‘ Dobbins Yes No é
{ If you answered “Yes“ to as to one, two or all of the defendants
Y in question 4, you must consider what damages are due the
plaintiff as a result of use of excessive force.
5. Under the law as given to you in these instructions, state
the amount of compensatory or nominal damages the plaintiff
should be awarded:
,
6. You may only assess punitive damages against that defendant
or those defendants against whom you have awarded
compensatory or nominal damages. Do you find that an award
of punitive damages is appropriate against one, two or all
of the defendants?
Yes No
State the amount of punitive damages, if any, you assess against
one, two or all of the defendants:
Kasbarian S
O'Connell S
Dobbins $
T - Foreperson should sign and date the form of verdict.
? ’ Y g <‘ gp
Add. A ~ le { [[0*
Foreperson Date I