Free Order on Motion for Hearing - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

I . ' Case 3:03-cv-00738-JCH Document 56 Filed O3/20[2004 Pagd 56 ${758/ /9101*-
I ` I (__)
Ii I
D
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COIIIINIT I
DISTRICT or comscrrcu MAI? ·-3 I3 Ig; 5 ·, I
US DISTt€it;t` ij:m=‘r~· I
· Jia I
WACHOVIA BANK, N.A. and WACHOVIA : Civ. ActiiII1I£IlBEI°UI{ I If? I
MORTGAGE CORPORATION, : 3:03 CV 0738 (JCH) I
Plaintiffs, I my I
.` JOHN P. BURKE, in his official capacity I
4 p ,4 as Banking Commissioner of the : I
’ ‘ State of Connecticut, : I
\ I §\ Defendant. March 3, 2004 I
\ i AMICI CURME, 43 STATES AND STATE BANKING 0FFICIALS’
h'\ MOTION Fon 0RAL ARGUMENT I
I
’I
J Amici, representing 43 states, the District of Columbia, and the Commonwealth of Puerto I
\§ ( Eco and State Banking Officials ("43 States"), submitted a brief in support of Defendant John P.
e’s, Banking Commissioner of the State of Connecticut (the "Commissioner"), Opposition
\
\_ to Plairisniff s Motion for Summary Judgment and Cross Motion for Summary Judgment. The 43
Qtes igceivggotice that oral argument will be held on all Pending Motions on March 9, 2003 I
-, 4 , g <[ uc.;
\x 10:0Q, States hereby request oral argument on the motions for summary judgment I
fw ____ sched§d féigich hearing.
I I git understanding that the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency ("OCC"),
\ hich filed an amicus brief in support of the plaintiff, has been afforded oral argument for the
upcoming hearing. Therefore, the 43 States and State Banking Officials want the opportunity to
resent the opposing argtunent. Given the importance of this issue, not only in Connecticut, but