Free Response - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

Case 2:89-cv-00570-PCD Document 121 Filed OQ/1.8/2007 Page 1 of 3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
WILLIAM ROE, ET AL. : CIVIL ACTION NO. H89—570(PCD)
Plaintwfs :
MICHAEL HOGAN, ET AL.
Defendants : September 14, 2007
DEFENDANTS’ OPPOSITION TO SUPPLEMENTAL I
MOTION FOR ORDER OF COMPLIANCE
The defendants hereby oppose the Supplemental Motion for Order of Compliance
filed by Roy Sastrom and dated August 16, 2007. The basis ofthe Supplemental Motion
is Mr. Sastrom’s contention that the defendants “failed to review and update the
plaintiffs Master Treatment in June of 2007." As documented in the attached affidavit
from the Unit Director of the unit where Mr. Sastrom currently resides, a three month
treatment plan review concerning Mr. Sastrom was held on June 26, 2007 and resulted in `
the Treatment Plan Review document attached as Exhibit A to that affidavit.
Consequently, there is no basis for the claim asserted in the Supplemental Motion, and
that motion should be denied.

Case 2:89-cv-00570-PCD Document 121 Filed 09/18/2007 Page 2 of 3
DEFENDANTS
BY: RICHARD BLUMENTHAL
ATTORNEY GENERAL
Thoiias J. Ring? B
Assistant Attorney Genera]
Federal Bar No. ctO8293
55 Elm Street
eo. Box 120
Hartford, CT 06141-0120
Tel: (860) 808-5210
Fax: (860) 808-5385
E-mail: [email protected]

Case 2:89-cv-00570-PCD Document 121 Filed 09/18/2007 Page 3 of 3
CERTIFICATION
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing Defendants’ Opposition to
Supplemental Motion for Compliance was mailed in accordance with Rule 5(b) of the
#16* ilglllz
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure on this -l—4·lh day f July, 2007 iirst class postage prepaid
to:
Mr. Roy Sastrom
P.O. Box 35l
Silver Street
Middletown, CT 06457
Attorney Philip D. Tegeler
Connecticut Civil Liberties Foundation
32 Grand Street
Hartford, CT 06106
f
T o as J. R` g
Assistant A rney General
3