Free Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Motion - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

I
I Case 2:89-cv-005Z0—PCD Document 90 Filed 03/01/2005 Pagel of 2
I — · ‘ Q LD
I UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT I ED
I DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT D
I ZUHS MAH _ I D
I TII. C l= 37
WILLIAM ROE, etal., on behalf of themselves CaSéI,l®:m§£I»— (PCD)
and all Otl"l€l'S Slmllélfly situated, R1
P/aintifif A r' N, C T I
I vs. I
14**, FebruaI·y 2005
I MICHAEL HOGAN, etal, I I
I Defendant; I
I MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME I
. I l
Patrick A. Arbelo who is a class member by virtue of his status and plaintiff in the above
captioned action respectfully moves The Honorable Court for an extension of time within which to
file his OBJECTION AND MEMORANDUM or LAw to defendants MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION to thisI MOTION
FOR ORDER OF COMPLIANCE. Plaintiff is requesting a 30 day extension of time in this matter. I
I I
I
SPECIFIC FACTS I
The plaintiff is incarcerated and opposing counsel dose not object to the re uested
extension. This is plaintiff’s second request for an extension of time. Mr. Arbelo res ectfully -
requests that The Honorable Court take notice of the fact that he is an individual with ilateral
Blindness Secondary to Congenital Glaucoma. Plaintiff with the assistance of a peer commenced
working on the objection and memorandum of law and is in the process of drafting the Hrlefl I
I
While in the latter stages of briefing, the plaintiff’s peer advocate was forced to co¢Imence I
work on an other matter pertaining a stabbing assault on his Ward, therefore he wad forced
to stop and stopped working on the present matter pending before The Honorable CourtI I

i l
i
_ _ . Case 2:89-cv-0O(570—PCD Document 90 Filed 05/lv /2005 Page 2 of 2
Since plaintiff last requested an extension on 10"‘, January 2005 his peer advocate also moved
on plaintiffs behalf the Superior Court Judicial District of Fairfield at Bridgeport for the appointment N
of Counsel for Mr. Arbelo on the commitment to the Psychiatric Security Review Board.
r
i
Mr. Arbelo appeared in person and moved on oral argument in his case, the motion and I
preparations for oral argument were prepared by plaintiffs peer advocate. The plaintiffs peer i
advocate since been arduously attempting to complete the brief. Plaintiff thus respectfully *
request for an extension to and including March 9, 2005. The requested extension is necessary .
in order to properly prepare and present the plaintiff’s Memorandum of Law. l
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C., § 1746, I declare under penalty of perjury that the forgoing motion for
extension of time was placed in the C.V.H. institutional mail box on the 14'*‘, day of February 2005.
I l
l
Respecrruttv SUBMITTED,
THE PLAINTIFF
PATRICK ARaEr.o
i'J_(;,,I E
PATRICK it i
P. O. Box 351
Mroousrowu, Corwrzcncur 06457
CERTIFICATION Or THE §ERVICE I
I, Patrick Arbelo hereby certify that a true copy of the forgoing Motion For Extension of 'lirte was {
duly served by U.S. Mail, in accordance with Rule 5 (b) of the Federai Rules of Civil Pro edure, i
postage prepaid on this 14 th, clay of February 2005 to: \
Thomas Ring, Assistant Attorney General l
55 Elm Street , P.0. Box 120 i
Hartford, Connecticut 06141 - 0120 I
J- EL; _ {P ` \
Mr. Patrick Arbeiof r
By: Robert Kalman
2
i