Free Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

Case 2:91-cv—00180-BNC Document 564-5 Filed 06/23/2008 Page10f4
EXHIBIT B

Case 2:91 -cv—OO1 80-RNC Document 564-5 Filed 06/23/2008 Page 2 0f 4
THE LAW OFFICES OF DAVID C. SHAW, LLC
34 Jerome Ave., Suite 210
Bloomfield, Certnectieut 06002
David C. Sltaw Telephone: (S50} 242-123B
ccnnwestistnu Fscsimitc; @601242-istn
w·¤.t¤¤.·.davidshawauy.ccm
J une 18, 200S
Darren Cuiminghairi, Esq.
Assistant Attorney General
State of Connecticut
P.C¤. Box 120
Hartford, Connecticut 06141
Re; PJ. v. Stare qfConnacricnr, No. 29lCV001E0(lLNC}
Dear Darren:
In addition to the depositions, expert visits and other discovery we requested on
June 12, 200S, Plaintiffs believe it is necessary to conduct an expert review of class
attrition including, but not limited to, a sample of class members who have been
reclassitled to outer disabilities groups and not taken into account in C5DE’s assessrnenm
of progress under the Settlement Agreement. We anticipate conducting these same
expert reviews under the same conditions and procedures vve agreed to for our recent
expert visitations in local school districts.
Please advise as to tvhether CSDE will have an objection to this discovery so that
we can resolve all of your objections to our discovery requests at the same time. If CSDE
has an objection, please indicate the basis for your objection.
Thank you.
1'
S?ice
uv.-{ .:3;,//
David Shaw
cc. Frank Laski, Esq.

Case 2:91-cv—00180-RNC Document 564-5 Filed 06/23/2008 Page30f4
EXHIBIT C

Case 2:91 -cv—OO1 80-RNC Document 564-5 Filed 06/23/2008 Page 4 0f 4
‘“€F?s`“—»
f';;é€:* .F4,l;\
7*.
{F ,·'°| I2! r:
RICIIARD BLt‘t·1te?t"r11sL t: e 5) se Elm tsueei
.-n·1·oeset‘oer~ms.u. EE; Ié-na no. Bas tec
~t_p£5¥.§FE,g§»/ itsrirtmi. tit strut-oteo
Ufllcc oi`Thc Attorney General
State: of`Coru1ect.1cut
June 19, EUGB
David Shaw. Esq.
The Law Dtices ot` David C`. Shaw. LLC
34 Jerome Avenue. Suite Eli}
Bloomfield. Connecticut ·lZlol]i}2
RE: PJ. v. State ot` Connecticut. l*~lo.. 25}lC‘v*(ll}ltil}[It.l~it'I}
Dear David:
l am in receipt ot` your various discovery requests. l arn working with SDE on a response
to you that will outline our view with respect to each request. Llnthrtunately, Anne Louise is out
of the olliee for the rest ot` the week and Lynn Taper will be away next week thru Wednesday.
But. I will endeavor to get you a complete response as soon as possible especially given the
upcoming deposition requests. l note that Judge lvtartinez denied your motion for an extension
ot`time and that theretere yesterday was the deadline for motions.
Very truly yours.
cs t `“
FT;?..-so l“~ C··~#·-s*Ag2"
Darren F. Cunningham
Assistant Attomey General
D]-‘{`:Im
cc: Anne Louise Thompson,S.D.F§.
Lynn `l`oper. S.l.`l·.E.