Free Memorandum in Opposition to Motion - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

Case 2:85-cv—01078-PCD Document 252-15 Filed 06/30/2005 Page 1 of 4
EXHIBIT 10 ‘

Au;§;E_LL?$:A:f'AvArAA;_rA _ ,4. -Q,&_A;"_.;" A _ . ...,r`.- '··-·· I: ` A !` _A` i-. ’· .[‘A.`, é I ho!-·l¤P1I\$LJ Y ‘ * xr" h . ’ g_,`,-`_
颢¤g¤_§;?'?=e%e»e_c&w,·¤z¤B§¤_e;v-e¢©qe-#P<;¤ _p_démg]e_+n 252-he ‘ $F||ed 0e¢ee¢2ci0s¤mBPe' e>ev¤f_4—.·;..
., ‘ -. V"' · A. ·"’ "- n `- "! #31;
V 295-2 I 77 dm; 8 IB1. 7: e 3 LAB .1 ' , H Y.; 4 ,
_ —-·, · 9 3- , é V- rw/5 I _}
' · ¤>:.A¤N-T=F¤=S ezeeee mee; ¤EFEN¤ANTS@;g5§’D —
1 IVKOHEGAN TRIBE ‘ rr £GEN?£CTICbT ";/kid!
E FEGLZDATED H77=·ia35 l " V l
{muse - ` '
25 USC 1,79 U.AS. Const., Att. E Sec. 3 ’ A
Return of Indian tribal iende conveyed since 1790 without federal consent.
P Ar s A
_- ‘ _ Atmieirmevs A " _ ` `
Jerome Grine: l ° r" ‘‘‘‘ " - ,- -
¤'¤@’fC#%fa’n’d’¤S’0’i2’e’e€¤’ #37 Nm St. V geist, tty Gene;-e1 V
H·3iIf*?C§?’:d,C'i', E;§~§¤nr`5enta1 Ftetecticn
527-5226 ` ` 0@/D7 _?.0. §Acx 1 “ _ A
=’ A __ Ea1:·tfe&·q ,Ct 6].01 Q; - `
John R. Wi11j_e,ms.- tel, 56 209 %etwj.e$.Q_SeZ;£1efe
‘ M7j*U/{M/ Withdfawiy ‘`‘
Q /E/7h@» J · Francis J. M3CQf€gO1f.’ gg
v New Haven, CT. , 065].0 t ‘ Assistant étty, Gen.,¢3~..;r, ¤;.Z_,,,_
i 562*9931 ‘ " §m"J
; .7 ` " ‘ "J/4%
A · - H3I"CfGI'd, COOH. é l
gaobexj; B, Cohen e .
t t ; .9 549*/*/$’% ‘ I
a ' Reeemem 1 {Amicus:
i. A/'
9 A ··_ ,_ L “ A
A i)9¤'h}'\i¢7}F°\ * , gltjlter ev General
gig; 3_ Ma; 118 `?'» · _ eu@uete_2/·’?·ie;ng·,;’ @i;;_,;;
A @7 @6/;*6 _ A 9 A; . ___v __‘__ ‘A _»__
i A ‘ Leslieli. Qzte A _A .
‘ e A US.Atty. - '
A A gfx ;§»>,_Lj
CQECK F§§_};NG {EES PA|[) . I/'l’f‘7 9 . STATISTICAL CARDS
‘ J HEHE DATE . Receu>T—NuMB»ER · » °c.¤,NuMaER ` CARD DATEMMLED
Leum JSt°
°"SE”"’“ F "
>¤~·A #$-6
AJPERIS { { ` 1__; —`
`FWQTATFR¤i£T¤1nT;Etx||RT¤GC§(ET \ V ` l V A A- · *`=!‘-**11

n
l ‘ , itsCaseI2:85-cv—01078-PCD Document 252-15 Filed 06/30/2005 Page3of4
:111A (
` ev._1/75) . V
p CHHLDOCKETCONUNUAUONSHEET
p;_A;NT|FF DEFENDANT `
_ ~ oocKsTNo}gZ;é§é_.
MOHEGAN TRIBE STATE OF CONNECTICUT PAGE22—OF-4-PAGES
DATE NR. Psocssmmss »

,L989 l
HV 16 87 RESPONSE to reply dated 6/13/89 for sanctions, etc. (under sealed) -
JN 26 488 SUPPLEMENT #1 to response of Atty. Griner dated 6/15/89, as to procedure by whic·
Tribal membership & representation is to be determined ·
; JN 27 489 SUPPLEM NT #1 to response to reply to motion for sanctions, etc.
{ IUN 28 490 MOTION re Atty. Griner's order re motion for sanctions/referral to grievance
· co mittee under seal
Q JUN 28 491 MOTION for enlargement of time to respond to atty. Griner{s statement of fact Jl
l l issues, to indicate further factual issues (including witnesses & exhibits) &·
Q to provide further materials regarding disputed individuals' status in the tribe
man 7/27/89 ( ‘ .
g UN 29 492 RESPONSE to communication of atty. Griner dated 6/26/89
Q UN 29 493 RESPONSE of ata?. Griner to Mr. Cohen's agree/disgsree commeqts
§IL 5 END on dckt #4 1 GRANTED. Atty. Cohen shall compE§ on or e ore -4
§ 7/27/89. Dorsey, J. copies mailed
§IL 27 494 COMPLIANCE by atty. Robert B. Cohen with sec. 3 of the order of the
{ court dated 5/18/89
§ IL 28 95 LETTER dated 7/26/89 to PCD bcom atty Cohen (filled under sealed)
i UG 3 96 SUMMARY of issues & facts re: representation of pltf. Mohegan.Tribe h
§>CT 24 497 STATEMENT of the Mohegan Tribe with re ard to the lands claimed i·
Q · the amendment to the complaint dated 11710/78
E 3T 27 498 REPUDIATION by pltfs.Mohegan Tribe of the false, misleading &
§ statements of atty. Robert B. Cohen in his statement (allegedly .,,
p of Mohegan Tribe) with regard to lands claimed, dated 10/24/89 ·
§ OV 15 499 MOTION to Strike & for Sanctions ,
g OV 15 500 MEMO of law in support of motion to Strike & for Sanctions
EIOV 21 501 OBJECTION to motion to strike & for sanctions dated 11/15/89 by pl f
i L990 ‘ · _ .
i xPR 9 502 ORDER OF REFERENCE TO U.S. MAG. SMITH (settlement negotiations to
ép p the conclusion of the case) — Dorsey, J. copies mailed
§,AY 29 503 MOTION for permission to w/d appearance of Dennis Cavanaugh for pl f
i AY 30 504 MOTION for permission tp w/d appearance of Earl Phillips for pltf.
g AY 25 SETTLEMENT CONF, HELD BEFORE TPS — new date to be set up in June
p for further talks "
`.Y 30 END on dckt #503 — GRANTED. Dorsey, J.~ copies mailed
AY 31 505 MOTION for permission to w/d appearance of John F. Droney, Jr. for
· pltf. · _
{AY 31 END on dckt #504 — GRANTED. Dorsey, J. copies mailed
_ [AY 31 END on dckt #505 — GRANTED. Dorsey, J. copies mailed
ECIUN 6 506 OBJECTION to claims for 700,000 acres & other amonuts & relief in
f' atty Cohen‘s statement of 10/24/89
C IN 6 507 OBJECTION to implied claim for attys fees by defs.
IN 14 508 MOTION for leave to conduct supplemental discovery for a disclosur
{ schedule, & for modification of the stay for these purposes p

. ‘ Case 2:85-cv-01078-PCD Document 252-15 Filed 06/30/2005 Page 4 4
: 111A · _ ` `
. ev. 1/75) ` ·
CHHLDOCKETCONNNUAUONSHEET
PLAHWUFF DEFENDANT . »
_ DOCKETNOH77—434
MOHEGAN TRIBE STATE OF CONN. PAGE23 OF PAGES 1
` DATE m PROCEEDINGS
, I I •
i UN 14 509 MEMO in support of motion for leave to conduct supplemental discov-r
` for a disclosure schedule, & for modification of the stay for these •i
UN 21 510 PLTF'S objection to def's motion for leave to conduct supplemental
discovery, for a disclosure schedule, E formodification of the Stay
for these purposes dated 6/14/90
A UN 21 511 PLTF'S memo of law in opposition to def's motion for leave to cond c·
E supplemental discovery, for a disclosure schedule, & for modificati•n
E of the stay for these purposes
?'UN 25 512 DEF'S response to pltf's memo of 6/19/90 re supplemental discover l
é JN 28 513 PLTF'S reply to def's response dated 6/25/90 supplemental discover~
y UL 3 514 MEMO in opposition to motion for leave to conduct supplemental disc
p UL 10 515 DEF'S response to pltf's memo of 7/3/90, & letter of 7/5/90, opposfng
j V discovery ·
g UL 10 516 AFFIDAVIT pursuant to local rule 9(d)4
g JL 10 END on dckt #508 — GRANTED in part. Pltf. shall produce a copy of tl
§ submission conincidental with the filing of same with the Bureau of
is _ Indian Affairs. The process by which the Bureau will receive & conciv
Q submissions by interested parties is a matter that is internal to t e
Q _ Bureau. Dorsey, J. copies mailed
Q‘UL 20 517 MOTION for reconsideration & motion to modify scheduling order pu·s
Q to rule l6(b), FRCP by defs. .
Q IUL 23 518 MOTION for reconsideration & motion to modify scheduling order
j IUL 23 519 REQUEST for Oral Aggument by defs.
A UL 25 520 .PLTF'S objection to def's motion for reconsideration & motion to ·od
3 dated 7/20/90 . _
§ UG 2 ’END on dckt #518 — DENIED as not raising grounds not previously
1 considered. Drosey, J. copies mailed ‘
; /21 521 CIPY of letter dated 8/17/90 to Secretary of Interior frtu1Atty. Schaefer, filed
,/21 SZ! LmTHl&Re1&0@@0toPGJ&xmAUy.Sdm@kr,fUed t
i·R l 523 LETTER dated 3/18/91 to TPS from atty Cohen
{ R 1 524 LETTER dated 3/25/91 to TPS from atty. Griner fld.
; .T 18. 525 ORDER RE PENDING MOTIONS — to Strike & for Sanctions fld. ll/15/89 ha:
been stayed pending an agency decision ..... Dorsey, J. copies mail=d
~ " " M -· M -4 4
· —;"'*' ;> 66 Qgc r ' · ` ·· . - . -- ‘
KK; A omc Hocfief sheei for all fufuré §nfri@
lx ,• C‘ ‘
leo eases