Free USCA Mandate - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

____Qase 3:00-cr-00075-AWT Document 313 Filed O9AO6/2007 Page 1 of 1
. ` · D. Conn.
_ 05-cv-[99
00-cr-75
i Thompson, J.
United States Court of Appe ls
Fosrma
" SECOND CIRCUIT p
At a stated Term ofthe United States Court of Appeal for the Second Circuit,
held at the Daniel Patrick Moynihan United States Courtho se, 500 Pearl Street, in
the City of New York, on the , ,_ 22¤‘day of March · o thousand and seven,
Present:
· Hon. Robert D. Sack, `
Hon. Barrington D.~Parker, was COURT O,,.4__ ~;.,
H · FILE o »°:¤¤_ ,
on. Peter W. Hall, Circuit Judges. { HAR 2 ZZUUT Q
W
0m°’ASr¤¤n ll.t\\'·`· (`\%\
Kenneth Hawkins, COND Gmc p
_ Petitioner-Appellant,
v. l 06-4044-pr
United States of America,
, Respondent-Appellee.
Kenrhethllawkins, l
Petitioner-Appellant,
v. , 06-5357-pr
United States of America, t A
Respondent-Appellee.
Appellant, pro se, moves for in jinrma pauperis status and a certificate of appealability. Upon due
consideration, it is ORDERED that docket number 06-40*-l4— r is REINSTATED and
CONSOLIDATED with docket number 06-5357-pr, It is further ORD D that the motions for leave
to proceed in jbrma pauperis and a certificate of appealability are ENIED and the appeal is
DISMISSED because Appellant has not made a"substantial showing of e denial of a constitutional
right." 28 U.S.C. § 2253(tz); Miller-El v. Cockreil, 537 U.S. 322 (2003 . -
FOR THE COURT:
Thomas sreen, Acting C
gis zz ml >’* A
SAO·KJ~E