Free Motion in Limine - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut


File Size: 31.1 kB
Pages: 4
Date: June 1, 2005
File Format: PDF
State: Connecticut
Category: District Court of Connecticut
Author: unknown
Word Count: 401 Words, 2,499 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ctd/8837/103.pdf

Download Motion in Limine - District Court of Connecticut ( 31.1 kB)


Preview Motion in Limine - District Court of Connecticut
Case 3:00-cv-00052-RNC

Document 103

Filed 06/01/2005

Page 1 of 4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT MARGARET COWAN, ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF VICTORIA COOPER v. MICHAEL BREEN : : : : : : :

NO.: 3:00 CV 0052 (RNC)

MARGARET COWAN, ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF VICTORIA COOPER v. NORTH BRANFORD

: : : : : : :

NO.: 3:01 CV 0229 (RNC)

JUNE 1, 2005

DEFENDANTS' MOTION IN LIMINE RE: ANIMATION The defendants, MICHAEL BREEN and TOWN OF NORTH BRANFORD, move in limine for an order prohibiting the introduction of evidence or testimony on the following subjects: 1. All versions of the plaintiff's animation of the shooting incident

In support of this motion, the defendants offer as follows: 1. 2. 3. The animation is based upon the opinions of an unqualified expert The animation is the result of unreliable methods; The animation is irrelevant;

1

Case 3:00-cv-00052-RNC

Document 103

Filed 06/01/2005

Page 2 of 4

4.

The probative value of the animation is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice;

5.

The plaintiff's latest version of animation based upon the opinions of Kent Schwendy was disclosed approximately one week ago and thereby severely prejudiced the Defendants' ability to analyze the animation and verify that it accurately depicts the opinions and calculations that it purports to portray.

6.

The animation is purported to be based upon a reconstruction that does not accurately reflect the actual facts; and,

7.

The animation is not based upon accurate facts.

The defendants have filed herewith a memorandum of law in support of this motion.

2

Case 3:00-cv-00052-RNC

Document 103

Filed 06/01/2005

Page 3 of 4

WHEREFORE, the defendants, MICHAEL BREEN and TOWN OF NORTH BRANFORD, pray that their motion in limine is granted. THE DEFENDANTS, MICHAEL BREEN and TOWN OF NORTH BRANFORD ___/s/ John J. Radshaw, III____ Thomas R. Gerarde, ct5640 John J. Radshaw, III, ct19882 Jeffery E. Potter, ct26356 HOWD & LUDORF 65 Wethersfield Avenue Hartford, CT 06114 (860) 249-1361 (860) 249-7665 (fax)

3

Case 3:00-cv-00052-RNC

Document 103

Filed 06/01/2005

Page 4 of 4

CERTIFICATION This is to certify that a copy of the foregoing has been sent, handling charges prepaid, via U.S. Mail to the following counsel of record this 1st day of June, 2005 David N. Rosen, Esquire Rosen & Dolan, PC 400 Orange Street New Haven, CT 06511

___/s/ John J. Radshaw, III____ Thomas R. Gerarde John J. Radshaw, III Jeffery E. Potter

4