I It I @
ZIIII5 .I.I·’?I I5 IDI W 3.5/
uumau STATES DISTRICT cOU?l§I§lj\I @QI_IIJ¥
' . DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT “··`II I" URI? L I »
I MARGARET COWAN, : @5
‘ ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE : .
I ` OF VICTORIA COOPER : NO.: 3:OOCV52 (RNC)
v. Z
MICHAEL BREEN 1 I
MARGARET COWAN, T
ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE : _
OF VICTORIA COOPER : NO.: 3:O1CV229 (RNC)
v. i
TOWN OF NORTH BRANFORD APRIL 14, 2005
REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS DATED APRIL 29, 2002
I May 19, 2005. Cowan v. Breen, et al.
I 3:00CV00052
I Re: Defendants' Request for Leave to Amend Responses to Plaintiff's First
Request for Admissions dated April 29, 2002 (Doc. # 87) .
Granted by consent as to response to request 110; denied as to response to
1 request 24. Defendants have not shown that the latter response needs to
. amended to promote a just adjudication on the merits. They state, rather,
that the response as it stands is accurate, that they "make no attempt to
retreat from it," and that the motion to amend is made "in an abundance of
I caution to make the response . . . more complete." In addition, plaintiff
j has shown that permitting the amendment at this late date would §§ unduly
prejudicial. So ordered. ` {gf ,....,_ if Msg
` iii? .... I
. A I jiiié J ..:··~·` M
I I =¢‘¤-' —¤ I .....
I I _ I F I II
I Rgbert N. Chatigny,I(b'.S.D.CT ;o)I:—~I E
~ · \ I I ...*7 T"? I
I y _. ._.. - I. : III"’‘ I ‘°°
=I» , ..·I, T I