Free Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Motion - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut


File Size: 58.0 kB
Pages: 2
Date: August 11, 2004
File Format: PDF
State: Connecticut
Category: District Court of Connecticut
Author: unknown
Word Count: 479 Words, 2,860 Characters
Page Size: 612.72 x 1008 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ctd/9116/105.pdf

Download Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Motion - District Court of Connecticut ( 58.0 kB)


Preview Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Motion - District Court of Connecticut
_ Case 3:00-cv—00339-RNC Document 105 Filed 2004 Page 1 of 2
Q lII I
I F li ttm - I
II
I Zi} I I
` lIII.UGIn AH.]?
UNITED STATES DISTRICT gig URT. _,
DISTRICT OF CONNECTI T ¤ -=I.I sg, ·;·_:-HW PU __> r___
4;·g****4.-In-ui-upwe·kwe·kIk·k*-kv¢w*w*¤w¢***·k************* I I I `ybg-" f
THOMAS O’CONNOR * i· eket No. 3:00 CV 339 (RNC)
Plaintiff, : I
v. *
LYNNE B. PIERSON, etal. *
Defendants. * I
* M gust9,2004
s\··k·k·k·k·k1lu|I·1|¢iesE1l••~k1k··i¢aksi:*¤k·k*****·k****************
PLAINTlFF’S MOTION FOR EXTEN V; ON OF TIME
|l
The plaintiff moves for an extension of time until onclay August 23, 2004 to
respond to the defendant's Motion l:o Supplement the ord and for Additional
Findings. The pIaintiff’s response presently is due Aug 13, 2004.
This additional time is needed because plaintiffs ounsel was in the midst of
litigation for most of July in a case on the Complex Litig Docket in Middletown
Superior Court encaptioned Duart v. State of Connectic De artment of Corrections
Docket No.; X04CV02-0103475-S. Plaintiffs attorney ust now able to turn his
attention to the pending motion.
Attorney John J. Radshaw, who represents the •!: enclant, has been consulted I
and he has no objection to this motion.
This is the parties' first request for an extension ·· time to respond to the
defendant’s motion to dismiss. I
I I
THE LAINTIFF,
Leo " Il . Rosen • Iatt (ct00284)
Law ffices of Leon l\/l. Rosenblatt
10 Main Street
-Hy artford, CT 06107
(86 sig 523-8066 N
I I
I
I I
I
I I
I I
I A I A I I I A I A I A I A I A AIII H Al.` " *i*` " `I'` " ‘`i‘ T""r"*r*—c=e~=—=e=e»=-e~
I) ` 4ZWMMHQMFFIETEii`- or’*
‘ ii i ii i is i is i is i is i is · 3s e 3s » ss s ss » I I
` "` ‘ “‘ · ··~ · --~ · --2 . ..A _ ____ ___L _ M · M · M · M ·
I h I h I h I · I · I · I · I · I · I h Alhn H *l.` ii‘‘ ””"""***eeeF—e—=e=¤e~=s==
`HV (y””' F —;·e
`iii it ‘iii it ‘iii iiis it iiis in iris or iris in pr~s I 3s—s I ss—s I I

· Case 3:00-cv—0033?-I%tNC Document 105 Filed 08/ III, Page 2 of 2
CERTIFICATION
This is to certify that a copy of the foregoing was ailed, postage prepaid, on this
the 9th day of August, 2003 to:
I Attorney Michael J. Rose
Attorney Alexandria Voccio
Attorney John J. Radshaw III I
Howd & Ludorf I
65 Wethersfield Ave. I
Hartford, Connecticut 06114 I
I · . ./·
Leon M osenblatt
I I
I
I
I I
I I
I I
2 I I