Free Motion for Summary Judgment - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut


File Size: 163.7 kB
Pages: 3
Date: March 21, 2005
File Format: PDF
State: Connecticut
Category: District Court of Connecticut
Author: unknown
Word Count: 376 Words, 2,243 Characters
Page Size: 614.4 x 790.8 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ctd/9168/107-3.pdf

Download Motion for Summary Judgment - District Court of Connecticut ( 163.7 kB)


Preview Motion for Summary Judgment - District Court of Connecticut
I Case 3:_00—cv-00391-HBF Document 107-3 Filed 06/08/2005 Page 1 0f 3
1

Case 3:00-cv-00391-HBF Document 107-3 Filed 06/08/2005 Page 2 of 3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
l DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
DUANE ZIEMBA : CIVIL NO. 3:0OCV39l (WWE)(HBF)
V. A :
I FREDERICK THOMAS, ET AL. : MARCH 9, 2005 .
AFFIDAVIT OF JOHN ARMSTRONG
· I, Jolm Armstrong, having been duly sworn, deposes and says:
1. I am over the age of 18 and believe in the obligations of the oath.
2. In 1997-1999, I was the Commissioner of the Connecticut, Department of Correction
("DOC").
3. In that capacity, I routinely received a great number of phone calls from various
` individuals and organizations, including DOC staff] attomeys, legislators, media
representatives, former imnates, etc.
4., Due to the high volume of calls, and various other responsibilities associated with the
A _ position of DOC Commissioner, it was not feasible to personally accept, or return, all
phone calls.
I 5. There was no routine or practice to decline to accept, or fail to return, phone calls from
~ relatives of inmates. In fact, I did speak on occasion with family members of inmates
concerning various issues surrounding the incarceration of their relative.
6. I do not have a specific recollection of any phone conversation in 1997 or 1998 with
relatives of the plaintiff
7. If, in a phone conversation, a family member raised a concern about unconstitutional or
inappropriate treatment, or any other issue that indicated the necessity for ian
investigation, I would request that the family member document that concem and I would

Case e;0o-cv-00;-191-HBP Document 107-3 Filed 06/08/2005 Page 3 of 3
then refer that complarnt to DOC staff at the pertinent fac1l1ty.ATh1s was done, 1n part, to
provide a documented record to DOC staff and to avoid any duplicative or redundant
efforts Staff. §.gPQvy(` GN;} QV; `HGQ ··€C\C C \frCL\WI5+(U'{ (*63)
\® ‘ V/\ §' gf) Vy GY" O Cj(,Lb»{¢é'L,g7"¤r[ I . /A./_.'
I have read the foregoing statement and it is true to the est f my wledge and belief.
J 0 e Arms , ong 14 _
Swom and subscribed before me on this day of March, 2005.
r ic / Commissioner of Superior Court
2