Free USCA Mandate - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut


File Size: 47.3 kB
Pages: 1
Date: September 29, 2004
File Format: PDF
State: Connecticut
Category: District Court of Connecticut
Author: unknown
Word Count: 374 Words, 2,339 Characters
Page Size: 612.72 x 1008 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ctd/9245/99.pdf

Download USCA Mandate - District Court of Connecticut ( 47.3 kB)


Preview USCA Mandate - District Court of Connecticut
. =.‘. -.·z = ‘· - - ·- . — I`-
: .,. v-00468-PCD Document 99 I °‘’.; iIIja_"I`gQI?‘Qf I . I
& ` 9‘9 j I ‘i99Y N L I
I “ U ·t a si t tc t ra LI gu I
· Ill E 8 Bb- 0lll‘ I BRS J- ..`‘ wr .¢<9 ;I—i· I A- ·
Anvonrnm pp · I. - I
· sacomn cmcmgr . . _` _ g Z-};. in __ :_. p-I .. p c .
..1 . -VC;-"-_` ix-I I l I
At a stated Term of the United States Court `of Ap · eals for the Second Circuit, held t the I
Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, Foley Sq _ .· e, in the City of New York, on · I
l4“‘ day of April, two thousand and four. " _ _;p .
Before: Hon. Wilfred Feinberg, I, if ` F g? OF.-y,s__) I ‘ `
Hon. Antalya L. Kearse, __’ ..-. I T ,_`. F ” .
Hon. Reena Raggi, . · =_, 4 2004 . I
i I . . we
R it -7Ia Docket No. 03-7207, 03-7255 QSDND (;\BC•° ,
DORIAN DAVIS, · ._ r I. _i· _A I_
Plaintiff-A ellee-Cross-A » ¤ llee ·I i``'
— against - · - . ‘
RICHARD RODRIGUEZ, WILLIAM RIVERA, TROY GO • II ON & CITY OF
Defendants-A ellees-Cross- u- llants §_*‘j JE ( J . f I ,
7*; ···- I
HARTFORD HOSPITAL, . 3 gee I . I
Defendant-Appellee, ZJ; I; Zig E ,___ 5 I
. HARTFORD POLICE DEPARTMENT & DEBRA PACHUC , IJ ii: _ I
Defendants. ` I I
Appeal from the United States District Court for I e District of Connecticut.
This cause came onto be heard on the transcript • f record hom the United States I strict I
Court for the District of Cormecticut and was argued by c unsel. - _
On consideration whereof] it is hereby ORDERE II , ADJUDGED and DECREED t at the
judgment of said district cotut be and it hereby is AFF I' ED in part, REVERSED in p and .
REMANDED forfurtherproceedings in accordancewith eopinion of this Court. The cross- ppeal i
is dismissed as tmnecessary. I
Rosearm B . MacKec:h.n1e, CLERK 5;-js I B' MA°KECHN'B· Clcrk
.... I- o v I
by i I I/I/I7¤»¤(Iat,Q..n. I _ I
DEP Y C ERK mh M.He11er I
M¤ti ¤S'St¤ffA¤¤m¤Y I
_ISSUED AS MANDATE: CI /OI‘I — I

I I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1

I
I