Free Exhibit - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut


File Size: 98.3 kB
Pages: 2
Date: December 31, 1969
File Format: PDF
State: Connecticut
Category: District Court of Connecticut
Author: unknown
Word Count: 237 Words, 1,969 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ctd/9352/101-3.pdf

Download Exhibit - District Court of Connecticut ( 98.3 kB)


Preview Exhibit - District Court of Connecticut
Case 3:00-cv-00705-CFD Document 101-3 Filed 05/11/2004 Page 1 012

Case 3:00-cv-00705-CFD Document 101-3 Filed 05/11/2004 Page 2 of 2
VINH VUoNG CELERA STOCK TRANSACTIONS
PURCHASES
z :¤;2:¥i&e¥:1.:2:Z$@2;:·¤&:&=::¢iisi‘éiLiz .·.-: z·¤§2: ;Q.;, v>». ..,;;.3:;;-,=:;;.;=:;:;·;sé..;.,.; v,:;i ,:1: ,,;·_v=_. z _·_., .,,»* ,· .,·;·· 3 _‘·· i.;._ ‘ * lr;,.; ·_,.- = lj; ;_. .1,, z.-; ..v.,,_ ,. _·.»_`».,, E ..v..v ; ,:;*;.:1,;. ;·.i
2/25/00 1000 $235 Dreyfus
2/25/00 1000 $260 Dreyfus
2/25/00 1000 $267 Dreyfus
2/25/00 1000 $268 Dreyfus
2/28/00 1000 $237.75 Dreyfus
Secondary Offering • 4,370,000 shares sold at $225 per share
2/29/00 · 51,832,914 Pre -sec¤m1my offering sham
• 56,202,914 Post-Secondary Offering Shares
,,,,_,,,,_ l zn, , .1,,,.,,,,,,1,,, ,.,,, ,,,,, A ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,=,,,,_,,,, nyf ,,,,,,,,,,,f,_,_,_,_,,,,.,,,,,,,,,,,,,_, A ..,,_,f,,,, ,,,,., ,,, ,,,, $ ,,,,_ ,,,,,,,, _ ,,,, n ,, ,_,,_ ,,,, tn efenfefe , 3,,,, ,,, ,,,,, ,, _,, ,,,,..,,.,, A ,,,,3,, , , ,,,,. r , ,3 ,, ,,,,,. .,,, ,,,,,, ,.,,1 ,,,, ,_,_. elyyy =,.,,,,,,=,. ,,,,,
=.,; -,.:; ._._ ._.. ,,;, 2 .*=_ .*;.:_._. E .’·;; ; _,.»,.. 2 =-.-s
PLAINTIFFS HAVE FAILED To MEET THEIR BURDEN OF SHOWING THAT
VUoNc CAN TRACE Hrs SHARES To THE SECONDARY OFFERING
• "Whether Vuong’s shares are Traceable to the Secondary Offering Cannot be Properly
Determined at This Stage of the Litigation?
• "[T]he Court would conclude that it carmot properly make that determination with the
relatively undeveloped evidentiary record on this issue."
• "Plaintiffs have produced enough evidence for a genuine issue of fact to exist as to
whether Plaintiffs’ shares were purchased in, or traceable to, the Secondary Offering?
Plaintiffs’ Br. at 20-21.