Free Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Motion - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut


File Size: 116.0 kB
Pages: 3
Date: December 31, 1969
File Format: PDF
State: Connecticut
Category: District Court of Connecticut
Author: unknown
Word Count: 439 Words, 2,969 Characters
Page Size: 595 x 842 pts (A4)
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ctd/9352/154.pdf

Download Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Motion - District Court of Connecticut ( 116.0 kB)


Preview Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Motion - District Court of Connecticut
Case 3:00-cv—00705—CFD Document 154 Filed 07/1 1/2005 Page 1 of 3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
: Case No. 3:00 CV 705 (CPD)
In re PE Corporation Securities Litigation
JULY ll, 2005
MOTION ON CONSENT FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
Lead plaintiffs David Berlin and Vinh Voung (“Lead Plaintiffs"), through their
undersigned counsel, hereby move on consent pursuant to Ped. R. Civ. P. 6(lo) and D. Conn.
Local Rule 7(h) for a one—weel< extension of time, through and including July 25, 2005, to file
their reply to defendants’ opposition to plaintiffs’ Motion for Approval of Their Proposed Notice
of Pendency of Class Action. ln support of this motion, Lead Plaintiffs represent:
l. Plaintiffs filed a Motion for Approval of Their Proposed Notice of Pendency of
Class Action ("Plaintiffs’ Motion") on June 7, 2005.
2. Defendants filed their Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Plaintiffs’ Motion
on June 28, 2005 (“Defendants’ Opposition").
3. Pursuant to D. Conn. Local Rule 7(a), Lead Plaintiffs’ reply to Defendants’
Opposition is due on July 18, 2005. Due to scheduling conflicts, Lead Counsel requires
additional time to address the arguments raised in Defendants’ Opposition.
4. Pursuant to D/Conn. Local Rule 7(d), counsel for Lead Plaintiffs has inquired of
counsel for defendants, who have consented to the relief requested.
5. This is the first request for extension of time following the filing of Defendants’
Opposition.
Wherefore, Lead Plaintiffs request an extension of one week, through and including July
25, 2005, to file their reply to Defendants’ Opposition.

Case 3:00-cv—00705—CFD Document 154 Filed 07/11/2005 Page 2 of 3
PLAINTIFFS N
a 511 4 or
. .
By: £;;i»*" ""·-~...% »$2.»~»»e-~·-"*“"”"~#~—---<-»`..
David A. Slossberg (CTl 3l l6)
Brian C. Fournier (CTl 6272)
I-IURWITZ, SAGARIN
& SLOSSBERG, LLC
147 N. Broad Street, PO. Box 1 l2
Milford, CT 06460
(203) 877 —— 8000
Plaintmfs ’ Liaison Counsel
Sanford P. Dumain (CT08l38)
Lee A. Weiss (C'l`2l345)
Shannon L. Hopkins
MILBERG WEISS BERSHAD
& SCHULMAN LLP
One Pennsylvania Plaza
New York, N Y l0l l9
(212) 594-5300
Plointwfs ’ Lead Counsel

Case 3:00-cv—00705—CFD Document 154 Filed 07/11/2005 Page 3 of 3
Certificate 0f Service
This is to certify that a copy of the foregoing was mailed, first class mail on July ll, 2005
to:
Stanley A. Twardy, Jr., Esq.
Thomas D. Goldberg, Esq.
Terence J. Gallagher, Esq.
Day, Berry & Howard, LLP
One Canterbury Green
Stamford, CT 0690l
Michael J. Chepiga, Esq.
Robert A. Bourque, Esq.
William M. Regan, Esq. =
Simpson 'Thacher & Bartlett LLP
425 Lexington Avenue g q,.»~~·*‘"”V
New York, NY l00l 7-3954 /Cjji//7
wfffffffiflé "m* ` M¥`“\.»—~"'“¤·~i
Brian C. Fournier