Free Motion to Detain Pending Trial - District Court of Delaware - Delaware

I I Case 1 :05-cr—OOO35-KAJ Document 7 Filed O1/18/2006 Page 1 of 2
I I IN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT I -
I - I _ FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ·
‘ I UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ‘ I
I I · Plaintiff g I
- v. I I ) Crim. A. No. 05—35—KAJ I
I I DAVID VVILLIAMS, ) I e I .
Defendant. I g ` ·
I I MOTION IFOR DETENTION HEARING
I I . II ` NOW COMES the United States Iand moves for the pretrial detention of the defendant, .
· pursuant to is U.S.C. §3l42(e) and (f). In support of the motion, the United States alleges the n
‘ following: I
` 1. Eligibilig of Case. This case is eligible for a detention order because case involves
U (check all that apply): I I
I I . _ I _ Crime ofviolence (18 U.S.C. § 3156) I I
I , _ __ I Maximum sentence life imprisonment or death I — _
__ 10+ year drug offense
_ ;<__ Felony, with two prior convictions in above categories -‘ · .
I _Q_(__ Serious risk defendant will flee I
. _ Serious risk obstruction of justice _ _

II I Case 1 :05-cr—OOO35-KAJ Document 7 Filed Q1/18/2006 Page 2 of 2 -
. I 2. Reason For Detention. The cotnt should detain defendant because there are no
conditions of release which will reasonably assure (check one or both): -
` _ X Defendants appearance as required ·
. _ A X Safety of any other person and the `community p
I` 3. Rebuttable Presumption. The United States will not invoke the rebuttable -
. r presumption against defendant under §3 l42(e).
I 4. Time For Detention Hearing. The United States requests the court conduct the
detention hearing,
- __ At first appearance I `
X Alter continuance of 3 days (not more than 3).
I I DATED this l8th day of January , 2006 .
I · . · COLM F. CONNOLLY
‘ ‘ United States Attomey
/tawt
. By: ijiti/i /i/fg -
‘ Richard G. And ews
I First Assistant nited States Attorney -