IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
ROLAND C. ANDERSON :
vs. : CN. NO. 05-877-JJF
GENERAL MOTORS :
MOTION FOR REQUIREMENT
of ORDER DATE 17 OF MARCH 2006 COURT
WHEREAS, on January ll, 2006, I Iiled a Motion to Stay Ol] the basis tI1at I filed a
Motion for Reco11siderati0n with the EEOC for not properly investigating the hire information
..needed..toca11swe1;t
Defendant.
Reason stated above, I would like this court to reconsider because the investigation is sti ll
g in the process stages for the Interest of Justice. Reasons are; EEOC 11ever investigated the _;;§d’1i»·.;°‘·g_&_)
`6d‘G.M., but lrom a letter sent to them from G.M. I spoke to official enforcement who
adjvised me tl1at they have the list and I am still waiting under the (Freedom of lnionnation Act).
I am presently speaking to Department ot` Civil Rigl1ts about this case. i11[ormati011 and
the iéggprocessing. This is my motion to stay because ofthe violations (EEOC).
y , F .l... »1si1 A
iqigi 27 time 1
> 2 . - .Q i
e·1· ¤1~·· 1ta ¤t"¤0““T
Ei .,.... - .. .--.1 I e----·~-·— —
Case 1:05-cv—OO877-JJF Document 8 Filed O3/27/2006 Page 2 of 2
Mari M. Tomasso/Legal Department
Page 2
Thank you, Mgt
i L {U
Roland C. Anderson
l I3 Lloyd Street
Wilmington, DE |98U4
cc: District Court of State of Delaware
EEOC - Washington, DC __
Cn M #€·*>s»wJ¤=·»¤0 *€·<:*!.‘6Y`r-vii Dai.
D¢59¢€·» 06 $7....;.2ze, A9, <; ,
P.S. Child support has all the dates of G.M. new hires, but [ am not entitled to reeeive - but
EEOC can but choose not to investigate.