Free Motion in Limine - District Court of Delaware - Delaware

Case 1:05-cv—00879—SLFl Document 123 Filed 08/18/2006 Page 1 014
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
PH{E ELECTRIC CORPORATION & )
PIKE ELECTRIC, INC., g `i
Plaintiffs, g
vs_ ) C.A. No. 05-879-SLR
Mica DUBEA, )
)
Defendant. )
PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 2: A
TO EXCLUDE THE PROFFERED EXPERT TESTIMONY OF KARYL VAN TASSEL M
Plaintiffs hereby respectfully move in limine for an order excluding the preferred
expert testimony of Karyl Van Tassel. The grotmds for this motion are set forth in P1aintiffs’
supporting brief and accompanying declaration, which are being served and filed
contemporaneously herewith.
Pursuant to Local Rule 7.1.4, Plaintiffs respectfully request oral argument on this `
motion. .
. Pursuant to Local Rule 7.1.1, Defendant opposes this motion.
OF COUNSEL: V William Wade (#704)i
Michael A. Paskin wade@r1 .com li
Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP Alyssa M. Schwartz (#4351) j
Worldwide Plaza [email protected]
825 Eighth Avenue Richards, Layton & Finger ¤
New York, NY 10019-7475 One Rodney Square, P.O. Box 551
(212) 474-1000 Wilmington, DE 19899
302—65l—7700 I
Dated: August 18, 2006 Atiomeysfor Piaint@ Pike Electric
Corporation and Pike Electric, Inc.
Rm-s049s1s·i

Case 1:05-cv—00879—SLR Document 123 Filed 08/18/2006 Page 2 of 4
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
DISTRICT OF DELAWARE LOCAL RULE 7.1.1
Pursuant to Local Rule 7.1.1, counsel for plaintiffs Pike Electric Corporation and Pike
Electric, Inc. have consulted with counsel for defendant Mick Dubea ("Dubea") and determined Q
that Dubea does not consent to the relief sought in the attached motion. I
i Alyssa l\/1. Sql/igartz (#43%) I
Rm -3007985-1

Case 1:05-cv—00879—SLR Document 123 Filed 08/18/2006 Page 3 of 4
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT i
FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ,
PIKE ELECTRIC CORPORATION & ) I
PIKE ELECTRIC, INC., g Q
Plaintiffs, I
vs_ ) C.A. No. 05—879—SLR
I
MICK DUBEA, )
)
Defendant. )
ORDER GRANTING PLAlNTIFFS’ MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 2: TO EXCLUDE THE
PROFFERED EXPERT TESTIMONY OF KARYL VAN TASSEL .
AND NOW, on this _ day of , 2006, upon review of Plaintiffs Pike ;
Electric Corporation and Pike Electric, Inc.’s Motion in Limirze No. 2: To Exclude the Proffered I
Expert Testimony of Karyl Van Tassel, and the supporting papers thereto:
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ Motion in Limine No. 2 is I
GRANTED.
IT IS SO ORDERED
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
RLFI-3049823-1 I

Case 1:05-cv—00879—SLR Document 123 Filed 08/18/2006 Page 4 of 4 I
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that on August IS, 2006, I electronically filed the
foregoing document with the Clerk of Court using CM/ECP, and have also served the document ·
as noted: E
BY HAND DELIVERY
Lewis H. Lazarus, Esquire
Morris James Hitchens & Williams LLP
222 Delaware Avenue, l0°h Floor U
Wilmington, DE 19899
Alyssa M/échwartz (#g;5l) _
RLFI-29668874