Free Motion for Summary Judgment - District Court of Delaware - Delaware

Case1:05—cv-00917-KAJ Document4 Filed 02/15/2006 Page1of2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
GBEKE MICHAEL AWALA, :
Plaintiff, :
V. _ Civ. No. 05-917-eKAJ
U.S. MARSHALL ANDERSON, et al. _
Defendants. : j ,w§w§é¤&~;§ _ E
I I ““ T
" F ;
F ? Uiib j 5 cage l
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT i E ‘"*) M*F Q
2 ~ H
r i*`”";‘_?"‘“"_‘*"’T"““*"‘é*t€ H
Now comes THE piaintiff Gbeke M. Awaia appearing in§Pro ,$ga;-»¥§f1*¤j_&’_’i;,,¤- E
tfully moves the honorable court for a’Summary Judg
captioned matter pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. Rule 56(a); In support thereof
the plaintiff states as follows: _
(a) It appears that the defendant have been silenced and
found nothing to say, and however, it is of the plaintiff opinion that
for as much as the defendant knew that the only reason they stoped the
alleged stomping and letting go of the plaintiff was because the officer
observed? form coming out of the plaintiffs mouth, therefore, the plain-
tiff reasonably believed that if he had been dead as a result of that
assault no one and absolutely no one would issue an appology nor accept
the blame, and it is obvious that the defendant are not ready to talk
things over nor resolve these claims, by this inferences plaintiff moves
for a Summary Judgment, because plaintiff is still under going treatment
and filed with pain.
(b) Now with regards to state officials, the Eleventh
Amendment bars suits on officials, however, in the case in chief the
defendant have waived their Eleventh Amendment immunity because of the
attack on the plaintiff, therefore, they are individually and personally
responsible for the deprivation of a protected right secured by the U.S.
Constitution. See BIVENS, 403 U.S. 388(1971). ·
WHEREFORE, plaintiff can rest on the allegations in his complaint which
the Court must accept as true. see Dowling v. Commonwealth of Penns lva—
nia Li uor Control Board, Civ. A. No. 88-7568, 1992 WL 328840 lE.D.Pal
Oct. 27, 1992}. see also Mortensen v. First Fed. Sav. and Loan Ass°n
549 F.2d 884, 891 (3d Cir.1977$.
The court should grant a Summary Judgment.
Dat d. U’ - ·
E Res bmitted,
cc: SETH AUSA. Delaware. 1-1 GBEKE {/ ·,,¤ pf __., ,
"*·=..,____°"

Case 1 :015-cv-0091 7-KAJ Document 4 Fnled 02/15/2006 Page 2 of 2
r és 1 1
g aP 4 11;
· 11. » . 1
·.1¤* 1 1 = F 1 1
'_ ,\ ;;_ ‘ I Q ; 1
an Jf`1 * E, g 1 1
I -1** 1 . ""ZI
$g§%£* ` 1 **1*;
1 J? 3 K 1 -
Q q_ DD q. u 4 1
1 ’__| LIJ E 21 `
Lu U. m\ * 1 E _
Q Q) ·~» 1 "
1 / - **:5: 1 1 ‘ 1
_— We ¤ .2
_ _ ‘ CU 1
1 5-• :: 1 1
1 O ZZ 2
"'J _ '
` _ 4-J O $2 s ` 1
-a.-v :..4 00 tr: 1 —
1 EI :1 cr --1: 3
GJ O 1-I ____: ’
rrd U +-= :: - Z 1 1
GJ g;] ....: . 1
GJ 4-1 QJ Q 3;;: ¤ ' `
»-·| O L-I ""Z‘.Z - `
j, ,.D -r-I 4-J ·~· ZZ _ '
1 ,1 ‘1-L G3 $4 U] C7 ""' 1
_ ` _1 . Ig; · 5.; 4.J O 1
_ __ ` O U1 OD 4-*
* · _ -;? C'. •»—| C'. DD i
’ O Q ·r·| C} 1 -
`1 "`f` E hd ~u—| j
• E Q
*‘ "t,1'}/ (U cn \d` |“' |'*·.|`
{ 1 .2* FG ' "dl [L`, 1
,·~¤1=§’1 r
1* -·q *2:. 1 1
’ 11`·· 1 F
::2* 1
r` I"? ·
{_ }_ .4.. a ·
1 · 1 1;%. ""* 11 1 n
=? 11 aw fi? 3} ·
1 _ V12 _1 .,..1 I '
M T1 `L"i%'· V?
w ¢ ·1·* 1 `-‘. —1 xé
_ 4.: uw 1 11 · aj ;1; 1
= cu 5G - ‘ 11 ¤ 1-¢1$iQL i<1£i 1 1
’ U] **1 1 1 tP¥’1 {
LJ cm ‘ 1 -*1;; 1 11 1 1
O H 5- 1 1 *1; 1?‘1i 1 .
1 gg g 4 1 _=°Q 1 1 §?i11YQ`z11€ 1
- 1.1 1:.1 1 iii? 11 ‘
cu 4-J 1 :
1-l —-:1· E ·~ 1- 1 1116* 1 ‘ ·
mmmwm
3 C) LO -I-J •r·| _ 1 1 `
1 • P-- >< ¤-! ·¤·|_ . j ' *1
1 E O F4 GJ UU' ' *1 1 .< A
1 N 4:0 ccs -:1 E
(U OO L-1 CG `
gd - GJ F-1 1-1 1 \
1 GJ . Q) ··¤ .,-| CU 1 1
.D O · (U 1-CZ GU t
- QD Z D-· in r3-1 cu 1
,.1 1
1
`\