Free Letter - District Court of Delaware - Delaware


File Size: 68.1 kB
Pages: 2
Date: December 31, 1969
File Format: PDF
State: Delaware
Category: District Court of Delaware
Author: unknown
Word Count: 477 Words, 3,107 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ded/35934/108.pdf

Download Letter - District Court of Delaware ( 68.1 kB)


Preview Letter - District Court of Delaware
Case 1:06-cv-00001-GMS

Document 108

Filed 07/08/2008

Page 1 of 2

1220 N. Market St., 5th Floor, P.O. Box 8888 · Wilmington, DE 19899-8888 (302) 552-4300 · Fax (302) 651-7905

Direct Dial: 302-552-4339 Email: [email protected] July 8, 2008 Via: E-file & Serve The Honorable Gregory M. Sleet United States District Court 844 North King Street Lock Box 31 Wilmington, DE 19801 Re: Riley v. CMS Our File No: 13252-00167 C.A. No: 06-001 (GMS)

Dear Judge Sleet: In response to plaintiff's correspondence of June 11, 2008, D.I. 104, I write to advise Your Honor that defendants, Correctional Medical Services, Inc. and Christine Malaney, have provided sufficient responses to plaintiff's discovery requests. On January 29, 2007, plaintiff filed Request for Production of Documents directed to defendants. (D.I. 60). On October 18, 2007, plaintiff propounded Interrogatories and Request for Production of Documents directed to defendants. (D.I. 76; D.I. 77). On October 31, 2007, defendants propounded Interrogatories and Request for Production of Documents to plaintiff. (D.I. 79). Defendants responded to plaintiff's discovery requests on November 15, 2007. (D.I. 80; D.I. 81; and D.I. 82). Plaintiff again propounded Request for Production of Documents to Defendants on March 24, 2008. (D.I. 100). Contrary to plaintiff's assertions, defendants have not "willfully defaulted on all discovery responses in connection with plaintiff's requests for production of documents." (D.I. 104). Defendants have provided sufficient responses to plaintiff's discovery requests. Specifically, on November 15, 2007, defendants filed Answers to Plaintiff's First Set of Interrogatories, D.I. 80, Responses to Plaintiff's Request for Production of Documents dated January 21, 2007, D.I. 81, and Responses to Plaintiff's Request for Production of Documents dated October 15, 2007, D.I. 82. All medical records in possession of defendants were attached under seal. D.I. 82.

Case 1:06-cv-00001-GMS July 8, 2008 Page 2

Document 108

Filed 07/08/2008

Page 2 of 2

On June 19, 2008, defendants filed a Response to Plaintiff's Motion to Amend the Scheduling Order. D.I. 102. In that Response, defendants recognized that as evidenced by plaintiff's letter to the Court dated June 11, 2008, D.I. 104, there had been some recent developments with respect to plaintiff's medical treatment at issue in this case. CMS agreed to obtain and provide the updated medical records upon receipt of same. On July 8, 2008, defendants filed Responses to Plaintiff's Request for Production (#3) dated March 20, 2008. Defendants filed the updated requested medical records under seal. Defendants' discovery requests to plaintiff must still be answered. As evidenced, defendants have properly and adequately responded to plaintiff's discovery requests. On behalf of Correctional Medical Services, Inc., I thank Your Honor for your attention and consideration of this matter. Very truly yours,

/s/Kevin J. Connors
Kevin J. Connors

/kam cc: Ophelia Michelle Waters, Esquire (via E-File and Serve) James W. Riley (via U.S. Mail)

15/641549.v1