1 · l
2_ ` l
3 _ IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT l
4 FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE h
5
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) _ _ _ _ _ _
6 _ PLAINTIFFI ) Case Mo., 1.06 CR 001 001 SLR
7 V g EX PARTE MOTION TO MODIFY JUDGEMENT
1 ‘ ) AND COMMITMENT AND TO SHOW CAUSE
8
_ ANDRES ABARCA SOLIS, g
9 · DEFEMDANT. )
P IO §
U]
·H ll
Z NOW COMES, Defendant (Andres Abarca Solis), in Pro Se, who hereby
H 12 A
lgg moves this Court to modify the Judgement and Commitment in this case
°’ ¤ 1-3 C
§F] to add to the recommendation in the J&C`tO recommend that the
-»·"" 14 » 6
Egg Defendant be placed in a BOP Facility near his families residence I
†15
- (HE -in Delaware to prevent further hardships.
LIE 16
} l
Eg 17 _
jgb Further, Defendant moves the Court to issue a Order to Show Cause
3 directing the Government to Show Cause as to why Defendant is
¤ 19 E
8 ` being seperated from his family by such a significant distance when
20 `
prisons exist in a closer proximity to his sentencing district.
21.*
22 This motion_is supported by the accompanying Memorandum. 1
23- I i
24 Dated: August 21st, 2007 _ _
I 25 I Respectfully Submitted,
26 l l " ` L? 2 E 1 i Q gg
27 Andres Abarca Solis ’
Defendant in Pro Se c
28 I A f
1 1. i
{ g Case 1:06-cr-00001-SLR _ Document 18 Filed 08/27/2007 Page 2 of 3
1 MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF EX PARTE MOTION TO MODIFY JUDGEMENT I
AND COMMHTMENT AND TO SHOW CAUSE · l
2 ’ . _ =
3 I . Q
TO: CHIEF JUDGE SUE L. ROBINSON . _ f
4 FROM: ANDRES ABARCA SOLIS (DEFENDANT); .
5 BENJAMIN_JACOB KERENSA y
6 ` # _ ‘
DEAR CHIEF JUDGE: g ‘
7 This memorandum is in support of the attached Motion. I am -
8 requesting that you grant the Motion since it is the policy _
9 of the Federal Bureau of Prisons to house inmates within their
10 region in which they were sentenced. However this is not happening
. I
11 in my case and as a result I am unable to see my family and it . _
12 cause undue hardship on me. I am therefore requesting that you L
13 grant my motion pursuant to Rule 35 (Fed Crim Rules of Proc) and
14 that my J&C be modified as requested and the Motion to Show Cause
15 be issued.
16 Lately, Federal Bureau of Prisons has been found to be failing
17 to be compliant with their own policies and even federal law.
18 See U.S. v. Kerensa, CR 03-00333-l-JSW (N. CAL 2007).
19 ‘ _ 2 _
. 20 Therefore I submit this request for your careful consideration and
2l·dnI ask you offer any remedy possible in this matter.
22 ·
23 Dated: August—21, 2007
24 Respectfully Submitted,
25 Andres Hbarca Solis
26 _ ` Defendant in Pro Se
27 ( _ _ ` ·
28 - e `ami acob Kerensa
I Consultant
Case 1:0Q @T1%.;‘·- Document 18 Fnled 08/27/2007 Page 3 of 3
` - -°"·‘£".f/9- V-1_:Z¤
J, l
..,l‘,!.A.
>-8 a.7 .` - Q Zi
‘ 3*.*8. ¢'1‘ é .£
;! JE ‘ —=;
- ’ F .· ·I-' 8;
8 2 { 2* M ¤
Y , - = 8 g
8 is 2 E *1 e (_) Z:.
8 8 1-·
e; 1- af 8 8,9, *5
1:. Q- - 14 . :::3
gé @8 A 171, E
1+; “ 8- --1 ` ,.5
@7 cn <:. ··-:
gg; #1 _ _ 5- _ E 8
1 I;} U1 UI M I
{ ‘*} • TJ1 I E
F, -3 D CU Cf 1-I :_ ·
- E I-I-1-I D :
1-1 ru 1-1 oo ,..2 _
{ N O 3--1 cn
Uri, E13 LI-·1 2 liu FI
-1-I cu .-1 {sl · I
S-I D fd D _ <
U Cl • €°’·?
O ’·I-I ·•·| ·IJ - - ‘
U 0 E U2 :2 8 1;;; 1
--1 0 ij 8
LI-I -IJ LI U5-IJ
8 _ ·‘ O U U c: tm ,···!
·1-1 -.-1 1:: .=:;_
8%:éME M
` - cu m E-1 ·=1· :-1
\ 1-1 -1-1 E1 <1· -1 -.·-*
-; U D ¢I} 00 E?. 8
M? $1
8 :5 vs"!
1-1 ..2 8
c> 8 :5 8
I W-; ·
FI ...3
'*¤ 3 l ZE
0 c E Q
3 #1 V8 I % 8
I"‘I >·| *• ' rt 8- V :1.-.;.: Q
O H • KO _ V 7%
tn ru ·U rw —=; #
·»-I {> 1**3 3 1 Z:
S EFI 2 “E
1~·
·=c cs cv _ Q _§
GJ g-I-’ •·._ Eli':
3* "*‘ 8 I Z"
M · -1 11. w
*0 U: c: E I 8 111:1
Q • ON ‘O A 2
ld} D F"! 1-I " 8 `