Free Letter - District Court of Delaware - Delaware

Case 1:06-cv—00009-Gl\/IS Document 21 Filed 06/28/2006 Page 1 of 2
The Honorable Kent A. Jordan
U.S. District Court Judge
844 King St.
U.S. Courthouse
Wilmington, DE. 19801
Re: Hickman v. Marzec., Consol. No 05-811 & 839-KAJ
(D. Del.) White v. marzec, No. 06-008-KAJ(D.Del.) and
Weatherspoon v. Marzec, No. 06-009-KAJ(D.Del.)
Dear Your Honor:
LL!
The actions of Marzec and his fellow police officers might Q . .-
be alright in Russia or China, but this is the United States and Steve Lu
Hickman, Sandra J. White and Tawanda Weatherspoon have clearly __!
established rights under the United States Constitution provided by ur. [wig
the fourth Amendment of illegal search seizure, to be secure in person, U-
property and things, against unreasonable searches and seizures. ] B
a. The actions of Marzec and his fellow police officers clearly C9
violate these rights and the way they did it disqualifies them from being
able to asset qualified immunity.
[1]. A police officer, wh o is well trained, supervised and with
Good intentions, after a three(3) month investigation would (a) know
the difference from Lincoln and Ellendale after numerous encounters
of traveling from one [fl] Town to the other .* (b). would know the
difference between a doublewide ** which was searched and a single
wide which is listed in the search warrant*** and (c) know the color
tan [which was the color of single wide in the search warrant] from
the color brown [which is the color of the double-wide] this is clearly
evident that there is a complete breakdown and failure on the part of
Marzec and his fellow police officers and as a matter of law are not
entitled to Qaulified Immunity.
[2]. No matter how many facts Marzec and his fellow officers
misconstrue the Supreme Court has ruled in Bell vs Hood, 327 U.S.
678 (1946) we reserve the question whether violation of that command
by a federal agent acting under color of his authority gives rise to a
cause of action for damages consequent upon his unconstitutional
conduct. Today [in re Bivens 403 U.S. 388] Today we hold that it does.
a. The Fourth Amendment provides that: in re Bivens
" The right ofthe people to be secure in their persons
Houses, papers and effects against unreasonable searches
And seizures shall not be violated .... " 403 Bivens v. Six

Case 1 :06-cv—00009-GIVIS Document 21 Filed 06/28/2006 Page 2 of 2
Unknown Fed Narcotics Agents at 389.
Marzec and his fellow officers at gunpoint destroyed all the
rights of Hickman, White and Weatherspoon deliberately and without
authorization and proper search warrant.
[3]. Their authorization, was for an existing single wide, tan
And white trim in Ellendale Delaware, not a brown double wide miles
Away in Lincoln Delaware.
a. Ms White, really suffers after this illegal invasions upon
her rights as a United States citizen and is tmly bothered to have
experience what Marzec did and believe it happen in the United States.
[She may never feel secure in her person, house, papers and effects
after this.]
b. Marzec and his fellow officer, seized the named plaintiffs,
a vehicle, money, papers and numerous effect illegally and without
a search warrant that was issued by a judge saying they could search
and seize a person or persons, money, car or truck, papers or effect were
a brown doublewide was located in Lincoln Delaware.
Between the Town of Ellendale and Lincoln.
** The search warrant authorizes a search and seizure of a
Tan white trim single wide not a brown double in Lincoln
Delaware and the single wide is located in Ellendale Delaware.
*** The search warrant verify no probable cause existed for
Search and seizure of a Double wide in Lincoln Delaware
i\ » · _· -‘ ,,.· , X . . K · - "*-.(` —` ,·
`T ·l\_1`jk`g 3 ]·Jt__i`]l myl ~;-. gig + §‘+"';- tZ...~— _ [tl 1 g 1 gi" ‘§']f ] ['i)t_Q L__i;.\-!‘(-- “ 1*
" Sandra J . White Steve Hickman Tawanda Weatherspoon
June 23, 2006 9008 GreenTop Rd
Lincoln,DE. 19960
Cc: Mr, Seth M. Beausang, Esq.,
Mr. Daniel A. Griffith, Esq.,