Free Stipulation - District Court of Delaware - Delaware

_ _ _ __ Case 1 :05-cv-00911-JJF Document 14 Filed O1/OQ/2006 Page 1 of 3 ,
— s ` eae I ~ " a~—a
as§ I . 1
1 Bingham McCutchen LLP Em
DAVID M. BALABANIAN (SBN 37368) F ..A . ( , ,_
2 CHRISTOPHER B. HOCKETT (SBN 121539) [ 5 0
JOY K. FUYUNO (SBN 193890) Q H , _ `
3 Three Embarcadero Center Ee ,
San Francisco, CA 94111-4067 (
4 Telephone: (415) 393-2000 p. , : - 9 `AQ 1 · i /
Facsimile: (415) 393-2286 "
5
Attorneys for Defendant
6 Intel Corporation
7
8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10 W
11 JUSTIN SUAREZ, on behalf of himself and all _ No. 05 CV 1507 ·HGL(R.BB) "BY PAK"
others similarly situated, ·
12 STIPULATION AND
Plaintiff, ORDER TO EXTEND FILING DATE
13 v. 1* FOR DEFENDANTS RESPONSE TO
PLAINTIFF’ _ Olt/IZPLAINQIQ
14 INTEL CORPORATION, a Delaware ,___ t `(4_
¤¤r¤¤r¤¤i<>¤» a t
Dsfsndsm- . ...
18 l il
IT IS STIPULATED BY AND BETWEEN THE PARTIES, TIIRO .
19
COUNSEL AS FOLLOWS:
20
Pursuant to CivLR 7.2, Plaintiff Justin Suarez and Defendant Intel Corporation
21
("Intel") hereby stipulate that Inte1’s response to Plaintiff` s complaint shall be clue either 60 days
22 .
after transfer of the above captioned ease pursuant to any motion to coordinate or consolidate
23 _
pre-trial proceedings per 28 U.S.C. Section 1407 or, in the alternative, 45 days alter any such
24
motion has been denied. The parties request this extension of time to answer or otherwise
25
respond because the plaintiffs in Bmuch, et aa'. v. Intel Corp., No. C 05-2743 (BZ) OLD. Cal.,
26 `
z A. (
STIPULATION At"` I ORDER TO EXTEND RESPONSE DATE
SUQR ` JET " QTNTEL CORP. 05-CV-1507
sr=rz1ssssn¤.1 I
yd L€6Z€6€9Lt¤t `¤¤S 6S¤¤Ll¤l·t19l1J¤El"l GQLZZO 90 Z0 GSS

· Case 1:05-cv-OO91§JF Document 14 Filed O1/09/2006 Page 2 of 3
1 filed J uly 5, 2005), a related matter, have tiled a petition to coordinate or consolidate pre-trial
2 proceedings per 28 U.S.C. Section 1407, and the above-styled action has been identified as a·
3 related action to that petition. As a result the outcome ofthe pending petition will impact
4 significantly the schedule of this case.
5 This isthe iirst stipulation between the parties. Because this litigation has just
6 begun, granting such a stipulation will not have any negative impact on the schedule of this case.
7 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED.
S DATED: September 2, 2005
9 Bingham McCutchen LLP
10
11 Ip V
By: L
12 Y I. ruvtrno
1 Attorneys for Defendant
3 Intel Corporation
14 DATED: September 2, 2005
15
16 The Mogin Law Firm, P.C.
17
18 By. . ` 74/w Vt
19 ANIEL J. M G
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Justin Suarez
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND RESPONSE DATE
SUAREZ ET AL. V. INTEL CORP. 05-CV-1507
SFf2lB33600.1
S'd t€6Z€6€9ttrL ‘d¤S €>‘==¤¤uu|-ttesuesm deixzn cn rn dec;

I Case 1:05-cv-OOQWF Document 14 Filed O1/O 6 Page 3 of 3
1
2 ORDER
3 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Intel Corporation’s response to
4 Plaintiffs complaint shall be due either 60 days after transfer of the above captioned case
5 pursuant to any motion to coordinate or consolidate pre—trial proceedings per 23 U.S-C. Section
5 1407, or, in the alternative, 45 days alter any such motion has been denied.
7 Dated: 2 3; , 2005
8 I/{
Judg o e District Court
10
11 _
12
13
14 I
15
16
17
18
19
20 .
21
22 ‘
23
24
25
26 I
3
sT11¤ULAr1oN mr:
SUAREZ ET AL. V. INTEL CORP. 05-CV-1507
sr=:z1s:a.aa¤o.1 A
ed LEGZEZGEQLVL `dl'19 SSHOL§u|-uetuegml dgygg gg Z0 dag