Free Reply to Response to Motion - District Court of Delaware - Delaware


File Size: 14.3 kB
Pages: 2
Date: July 5, 2006
File Format: PDF
State: Delaware
Category: District Court of Delaware
Author: unknown
Word Count: 378 Words, 2,274 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ded/35970/22-1.pdf

Download Reply to Response to Motion - District Court of Delaware ( 14.3 kB)


Preview Reply to Response to Motion - District Court of Delaware
Case 1:06-cv-00018-JJF

Document 22

Filed 07/05/2006

Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE H. LEIGHTON LASKEY, Plaintiff, v. PFC. ROBERT C. LEGATES, PFC. WHEATLEY and JOHN DOE, Supervisor on duty at Millsboro Police Department, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

C.A. No. 06-018-JJF

REPLY MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS OF DEFENDANTS PFC ROBERT C. LEGATES, PFC WHEATLEY AND "JOHN DOE" SUPERVISOR ON DUTY AT MILLSBORO POLICE DEPARTMENT 1. Plaintiff's Answer Memorandum asserts that "if a

defendant in a misdemeanor DWI case chooses to invoke their statutory right to refusal the police cannot involuntarily take chemical test." Plaintiff cites 27 Del. C. ยง 2742. Section 2742

(a) provides that "if a person refuses to permit chemical testing, after being informed of the penalty of revocation for such refusal, the test shall not be given but the police officer shall report the refusal to the Department." (Emphasis added). 2. A person under arrest for suspicion for driving under

the influence of alcohol has the right to refuse submission to a blood draw only if the officer informs the person of the penalty of revocation for the refusal. McCann v. State of Delaware, 588 In the absence of such a

A. 2d 1100, 1101 (Del. Supr. 1991).

statement by the officer, reasonable force may be used to take a blood sample from a suspected drunk driver. Id. at 1102.

Case 1:06-cv-00018-JJF

Document 22

Filed 07/05/2006

Page 2 of 2

3.

Plaintiff's Complaint does not allege that he was Thus,

informed of the penalty of revocation for refusal. officers had the right to use force.

Plaintiff may not rely on

the invocation of a right to refusal as the basis for his contention that defendants acted impermissibly by "forcibly taking evidence." WHEREFORE, defendants request that plaintiff's Complaint be dismissed with prejudice.

AKIN & HERRON, P.A. /s/ Bruce C. Herron Bruce C. Herron Attorney I.D. No.: 2315 1220 N. Market Street Suite 300 P.O. Box 25047 Wilmington, DE 19899 (302) 427-6987 Attorney for Defendants PFC Robert C. Legates, PFC Wheatley and "John Doe" Supervisor on Duty at Millsboro Police Department Dated: July 5, 2006
H:\tmw5\data\files\Docs\3651.044\REPL\4809.WPD