Free Answer to Amended Complaint - District Court of Delaware - Delaware


File Size: 16.5 kB
Pages: 3
Date: March 13, 2007
File Format: PDF
State: Delaware
Category: District Court of Delaware
Author: unknown
Word Count: 481 Words, 3,164 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ded/35970/42-1.pdf

Download Answer to Amended Complaint - District Court of Delaware ( 16.5 kB)


Preview Answer to Amended Complaint - District Court of Delaware
Case 1:06-cv-00018-JJF

Document 42

Filed 03/13/2007

Page 1 of 3

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE H. LEIGHTON LASKEY, Plaintiff, v. PFC. ROBERT C. LEGATES, PFC. WHEATLEY, MILLSBORO POLICE DEPARTMENT, TOWN OF MILLSBORO, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

C.A. No. 06-018-JJF

DEFENDANTS' ANSWER AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES TO PLAINTIFF'S "AMENDMENT" AND AMENDED COMPLAINT 1. Denied that the Town of Millsboro has a common policy

that directs the Millsboro Police Department to use unreasonable and excessive force to obtain evidence. 2. Denied that the Millsboro Police Department directs

police to violate civil law and use unreasonable and excessive force to obtain evidence. 3. Denied that Officer Wheatley and/or Officer Legates

under direction of common policy used unreasonable or excessive force to obtain evidence on January 3, 2004 against plaintiff. 4. Denied that on January 3, 2004 under common policy and

or lack of proper police training Officer Legates and/or Officer Wheatley physically assaulted plaintiff.

1

Case 1:06-cv-00018-JJF

Document 42

Filed 03/13/2007

Page 2 of 3

5.

Admitted that Officer Legates and Officer Wheatley

acted reasonably by assisting hospital personnel taking a blood sample from plaintiff, a suspected drunk driver, without plaintiff's consent at Beebe Hospital on January 3, 2004. Denied

that defendants punched, kicked, slammed or assaulted plaintiff in any way. 6. Denied that plaintiff's refusal was allowed under law.

Denied that any emotional and/or physical injuries resulted from defendants' conduct. AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES 7. Defendants are entitled to qualified immunity. Harlow

v. Fitzgerald, 57 U.S.C. 800 (1982). 8. No action or conduct of defendants violated any clearly

established statutory or constitutional right of which a reasonable person would have known. 9. Plaintiff's claims are barred by the County and

Municipal Tort Claims Act, 10 Del. C. ยง 4011 et. seq. 10. Plaintiff was negligent in a manner which proximately Plaintiff was negligent in that:

caused his alleged injuries.

(a) he was intoxicated and/or under the influence of drugs; (b) he violently resisted police officers' lawful commands;

2

Case 1:06-cv-00018-JJF

Document 42

Filed 03/13/2007

Page 3 of 3

(c) he assaulted defendant Officer Wheatley by kicking him and (d) he assaulted and/or offensively touched Beebe Hospital Nurse Carey Rutherford. 11. The actions of plaintiff were superseding and/or

intervening causes of his alleged injuries. 12. Plaintiff's refusal of consent to a blood draw gave the

defendant officers the legal authority to use reasonable force. 13. Plaintiff's Complaint should be dismissed because there

was no municipal custom or policy which caused plaintiff's alleged harm. WHEREFORE, Defendants request that the Complaint be dismissed with costs and attorney fees assessed against plaintiff. AKIN & HERRON, P.A. /s/ Bruce C. Herron Bruce C. Herron Attorney I.D. No.: 2315 1500 Shallcross Avenue, Suite 1-A Wilmington, Delaware 19806 (302)427-6987 Attorney for Defendants Dated: March 13, 2007

H:\tmw5\data\files\Docs\3651.044\ANSW\6978.WPD

3