Free Stipulation - District Court of Delaware - Delaware


File Size: 39.9 kB
Pages: 3
Date: October 3, 2005
File Format: PDF
State: Delaware
Category: District Court of Delaware
Author: unknown
Word Count: 570 Words, 3,419 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ded/35971/9.pdf

Download Stipulation - District Court of Delaware ( 39.9 kB)


Preview Stipulation - District Court of Delaware
Case 1:05-cv-00913-JJF Document 2 9 Filed 10/03/2005 Page 1 of of 3 Case 2:05-cv-00212 Document Filed 01/10/2006 Page 1 3

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT GREENEVILLE

ANDREW ARMBRISTER, and MELISSA ARMBRISTER, on behalf of themselves and all persons similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. No. 2:05-cv-212

INTEL CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation, Defendant. STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND

IT IS STIPULATED BY AND BETWEEN THE PARTIES, THROUGH THEIR COUNSEL AS FOLLOWS: Plaintiffs Andrew and Melissa Armbrister commenced this action on August 19, 2005. This case is one of over 60 actions are subject to a pending petition to coordinate or consolidate pre-trial proceedings per 28 U.S.C. Section 1407 (the MDL Petition). This action has been identified as a related action in connection with the MDL Petition, and Intel has notified the Clerk of the Panel of this related case. This Petition has been fully briefed and the Judicial Panel for Multidistrict Litigation ("JPML") will hear arguments on the petition on September 29, 2005, in Asheville, North Carolina. Consistent with the uniform response date that Intel has negotiated in the related federal antitrust action, the Plaintiffs and Defendant Intel Corporation ("Intel") stipulate that Intel's response to Plaintiffs' complaint shall be due either (1) 60 days after transfer of the above

21632153.1

Case 1:05-cv-00913-JJF Document 2 9 Filed 10/03/2005 Page 2 of of 3 Case 2:05-cv-00212 Document Filed 01/10/2006 Page 2 3

captioned case pursuant to any motion to coordinate or consolidate pre-trial proceedings per 28 U.S.C. ยง1407 or (2) 45 days after any such motion has been denied. In exchange for this extension Intel hereby waives service of the complaint in this action under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and accepts service by mail upon it counsel Richard A. Ripley, Bingham McCutchen LLP, 1120 20th Street, N.W., Suite 800, Washington, D.C. 20036. Respectfully submitted, ROGER, LAUGHLIN, NUNNALLY, HOOD & CRUM

DATED: September 29, 2005

/s/Jerry W. Laughlin Jerry W. Laughlin (BPR#002120) 100 South Main Street Greeneville, TN 37743 and David M. Balabanian (CA# 37638) Christopher B. Hockett (CA# 121539) Joy K. Fuyuno (CA # 123890) BINGHAM McCUTCHEN LLP Three Embarcadero Center San Francisco, CA 94111-4067 Telephone: 415.393.2000 Facsimile: 415.393.2286 Richard A. Ripley (DC# 412959) BINGHAM McCUTCHEN LLP 1120 20th Street, NW, Suite 800 Washington, DC 20036 Telephone: 202.778.6150 Facsimile: 202.778.6155 Attorneys for Defendant INTEL CORPORATION * * *

21632153.1

Case 1:05-cv-00913-JJF Document 2 9 Filed 10/03/2005 Page 3 of of 3 Case 2:05-cv-00212 Document Filed 01/10/2006 Page 3 3

Respectfully submitted, BALL & SCOTT

DATED: September 29, 2005

/s/Gordon Ball Gordon Ball (BPR#001135) 550 West Main Avenue, Suite 750 Knoxville, TN 37902 Attorney for Plaintiffs ANDREW AND MELISSA ARMBRISTER CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that notice of this filing will be sent by operation of the Court's electronic filing system to all parties indicated on the electronic filing receipt. All other interested parties will be served by regular U.S. Mail. Parties may access this filing through the Court's electronic filing system. This the 3rd day of October, 2005. /s/Jerry W. Laughlin Jerry W. Laughlin

L:\misc\Intel Corp. V Armbrister Andrew 05-2235\Stipulation to Extend Time

21632153.1