Free Letter - District Court of Delaware - Delaware

Case 1 :06-cv-00027-SLR Document 26 Filed 1 1/01 /2006 Page 1 of 2 · I-
_ u.Aw OFFICES _
_ ABER, GOLDLUST, BAKER & OVER ,
· (AN ASSOCIATION OF LAW PRACTICES)
702 KING STREET, SUITE 600
P.O. Box 1675 ‘
, WILMINGTON, DELAWARE 19899-1 675
GARY W. ABER, P.C. (302) 472-4900
PERRY F. GOLDLUST, P.A.* TELECOPIER (302) 472-4920
DARRELL J. BAKER, P.A. ·
SUSAN C. OVER, P.C. 4 ·
SHAUNA T. HAGAN ·
SAAGAR B. SHAH A
l *AI...SO ADMITTED IN NEW YORK 13 ‘ i
BY ELECTRONIC FILING 4 I _ I
V The Honorable Gregory M. Sleet . I
U.S. District Court ° ’
District of Delaware ‘ S A
844 N. King Street V T
· Lockbox 19 "
Wilmington, DE 19801 I
Re: Paganakis v. Exgress LLC, Case N0. 06-027 (IQ. Del). p
Dear Judge Sleet: ‘
In anticipation of the discovery conference scheduled for November 2, 2006 at 11:30 a.m. 4
in the above-captioned matter, Plaintiff Paula Pagonakis submits the followingitems to be
. presented to the Court: p
· Plaintiffs Issues:
• Defendant’s failure to produce responsive documents in response to Plaintiffs First Set
of Requests for Production of Documents to Defendant.
• Defendant’s failure to provide dates for depositions of defense witnesses and failure to
supplement its Initial Disclosures and notify.P1aintiff that several defense witnesses are
_ _ no longer employees of Defendant V
• Defendant’s failure to respond adequately to Plaintiffs First Set of lnterrogatories. g
` • Defendant’s failure to timely object to Plaintiffs First Set of Requests for Pipductian of ,
‘ Doctunents and Plaintiffs First Set of lnterrogatories to Defendant. ‘
Defendant’s Issues: ·

Case 1 :06-cv-00027-SLR Document 26 Filed 11/01 /2006 Page 2 of 2
• Plaintiffs unwillingness to abide by the agreements reached between counsel during a
conference call held on October 26, 2006;
• Plaintiffs failure to meet and confer on the one outstanding discovery issue that remains
unresolved — Interrogatories Numbers 3 and 5; and
• lf the Court finds that Plaintiff has satisfied her meet and confer obligations on
lnterrogatories 3 and 5, whether Defendant’s objections should be sustained.
G Respectfully,
/s/ Gary W. Aber
Gary W. Aber
GWA/mac