Free Case Transferred In - District Transfer - District Court of Delaware - Delaware

Case B:U5—cv—0G9Q@aMHP DRDMMIHTGYEG-2-E Hilledl 08/117/2005 Page 11 oil 11
1
1 er 28 U.S.C. Section 1407 or, in the altemative, 45 days after any such motion has been denied.
2 he panties request this extension of time to answer or otherwise respond because the plaintiffs
3 in Brauch, etal. v. Intel Corp., N0. C 05-2743 (BZ) (N.D. Cal., filed July 5, 2005), a related
4 matter, have filed a petition to coordinate or consolidate pre-trial proceedings per 28 U.S.C.
— 5 Section 1407, and the above—styled action has been identified as a related action to that petition.
6 As a result the outcome of the pending petition will impact significantly the schedule of this
7 case.
8 This is the first stipulation between the parties. Because this litigation has just
9 begun, granting such a stipulation will not have any negative impact on the schedule of this case.
10 ITIS HEREBY STIPULATED.
11 DATED: August 12, 2005 ·
12 Bingham McCutchen LLP
13
14
By: /s/ Jag K. F uggnc
15 Jov K. 1=uYUNo
Attomeys for Defendant
16 Intel Corporation
17 DATED: August _!__(?_, 2005
18
i 19 Cotchett, Pitre, Simon & McCarthy
20
21 By:
22 NANC INEMAN
Attomeys Plaintiff
23 Trotter-Vogel Realty, dba Prudential Califomia
Realty
24
25
26
2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE RESPONSE DATE