Free Case Transferred In - District Transfer - District Court of Delaware - Delaware

CAND-ECF - Docket Report Case 1:05-cv-00910-JJF

Document 16

Filed 01/17/2006

Page 1 of 4 Page 1 of 4

ADRMOP, CLOSED, E-Filing, RELATE, STAYED

U.S. District Court California Northern District (San Francisco) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 3:05-cv-03277-MHP

Rush v. Intel Corporation Assigned to: Hon. Marilyn H. Patel Demand: $5,000,000 Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Non-Motor Vehicle Plaintiff Edward Rush

Date Filed: 08/11/2005 Jury Demand: Plaintiff Nature of Suit: 410 Anti-Trust Jurisdiction: Federal Question

represented by David Boies, III Straus & Boies, LLP 4041 University Drive 5th Floor Fairfax, VA 22030 703-764-8700 Fax: 703-764-8704 Email: [email protected] LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Donald F. Drummond Drummond & Associates One California Street, Suite 300 San Francisco, CA 94111 415-433-2261 Fax: 415-438-9819 Email: [email protected] LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Ian Otto Straus & Boies LLP 4041 University Drive 5th Floor Fairfax, VA 22030 703-764-8700 Email: [email protected] LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Timothy D. Battin Straus & Boies LLP 4041 University Dr. 5th Floor Fairfax, VA 22030 703-764-8700

https://ecf.cand.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?106472645013832-L_280_0-1

1/18/2006

CAND-ECF - Docket Report Case 1:05-cv-00910-JJF

Document 16

Filed 01/17/2006

Page 2 of 4 Page 2 of 4

Email: [email protected] LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED V. Defendant Intel Corporation a Delaware corporation represented by Christopher B. Hockett Bingham McCutchen LLP Three Embarcadero Center San Francisco, CA 94111-4067 415-393-2000 Fax: 415-393-2286 Email: [email protected] LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Joy K. Fuyuno Bingham McCutchen LLP Three Embarcadero Center San Francisco, CA 94111-4067 415-393-2000 Fax: 415-393-2286 Email: [email protected] ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Date Filed 08/11/2005

#

Docket Text 1 ANTI-TRUST COMPLAINT: 28 USC 1332(d) Unreasonalbe restraint, anti-competitive actions, class action against defendant Intel Corporation ( Filing fee $ 250, receipt number 3375374.). Filed by plaintiffEdward Rush. Jury Demand, Summons Issued. (db, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/11/2005) Additional attachment(s) added on 8/24/2005 (tn, COURT STAFF). (Entered: 08/12/2005) CASE DESIGNATED for Electronic Filing. (db, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/11/2005) (Entered: 08/12/2005) 2 ADR SCHEDULING ORDER: Case Management Statement due by 12/6/2005. Case Management Conference set for 12/13/2005 03:00 PM.. Signed by Judge Laporte on 7/26/05. (db, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/11/2005) Additional attachment(s) added on 8/12/2005 (db, COURT STAFF). Additional attachment(s) added on 8/12/2005 (tn, COURT STAFF). (Entered: 08/12/2005) 3 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO COMPLAINT by Intel Corporation. (Hockett, Christopher) (Filed on 9/12/2005) (Entered: 09/12/2005)

08/11/2005 08/11/2005

09/12/2005

https://ecf.cand.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?106472645013832-L_280_0-1

1/18/2006

CAND-ECF - Docket Report Case 1:05-cv-00910-JJF

Document 16

Filed 01/17/2006

Page 3 of 4 Page 3 of 4

09/12/2005

4 Statement of Facts DEFENDANT'S FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 7.1 AND CIVIL LOCAL RULE 3-16 DISCLOSURE STATEMENTS filed byIntel Corporation. (Hockett, Christopher) (Filed on 9/12/2005) (Entered: 09/12/2005) 5 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO COMPLAINT. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte on September 13, 2005. (edllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/13/2005) (Entered: 09/13/2005) 6 ORDER RELATING CASES C 05-3271 EMC, C 05-3272 JL, C 053273 EMC, AND C 05-3277 EDL to C 05-2669 MHP; Case reassigned to Judge Marilyn H. Patel for all further proceedings; Signed by Judge Marilyn Hall Patel on 9/26/2005(awb, COURT-STAFF) (Filed on 9/29/2005) (Entered: 09/29/2005) 7 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re 1 Complaint, filed by Intel Corporation. (Hockett, Christopher) (Filed on 10/3/2005) (Entered: 10/03/2005) 8 Declaration of Richard A. Ripley in Support of 7 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re 1 Complaint, filed byIntel Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A# 2 Exhibit B# 3 Exhibit C) (Related document(s)7) (Hockett, Christopher) (Filed on 10/3/2005) (Entered: 10/03/2005) 9 Proposed Order re 7 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re 1 Complaint, by Intel Corporation. (Hockett, Christopher) (Filed on 10/3/2005) (Entered: 10/03/2005) 10 ORDER by Judge Marilyn Hall Patel granting 7 defendant's Motion for Extension of Time to Answer (awb, COURT-STAFF) (Filed on 10/5/2005) (Entered: 10/05/2005) 11 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO STAY DATES, EVENTS AND DEADLINES PENDING THE OUTCOME OF THE MOTION TO TRANSFER AND COORDINATE OR CONSOLIDATE PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. SECTION 1407 by Intel Corporation. (Fuyuno, Joy) (Filed on 11/1/2005) (Entered: 11/01/2005) 12 STIPULATION AND ORDER STAYING CASE pending MDL determination; Signed by Judge Marilynn Hall Patel on 11/7/2005. (awb, COURT-STAFF) (Filed on 11/8/2005) (Entered: 11/08/2005) 13 Letter from Joy K. Fuyuno re MDL Transfer Order of November 8, 2005. (Attachments: # 1 MDL Transfer Order)(Fuyuno, Joy) (Filed on 11/17/2005) (Entered: 11/17/2005) 14 ORDER STATISTICALLY DISMISSING CASE pending MDL determination; Signed by Judge Marilyn Hall Patel on 1/5/2006. (awb, COURT-STAFF) (Filed on 1/5/2006) (Entered: 01/05/2006) 15 ORDER of Transfer by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation to transfer case to USDC for the District of Delaware (In Re Intel

09/13/2005

09/29/2005

10/03/2005

10/03/2005

10/03/2005

10/05/2005

11/01/2005

11/08/2005

11/17/2005

01/05/2006

01/10/2006

https://ecf.cand.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?106472645013832-L_280_0-1

1/18/2006

CAND-ECF - Docket Report Case 1:05-cv-00910-JJF

Document 16

Filed 01/17/2006

Page 4 of 4 Page 4 of 4

Corporation, Inc., Antitrust Litigation - MDL - 1717). (gba, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/10/2006) (Entered: 01/11/2006) 01/11/2006 16 Certified copy of transfer order, docket sheet along with the original case file sent to USDC for the District of Delaware (MDL - 1717). (gba, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/11/2006) (Entered: 01/11/2006)

PACER Service Center
Transaction Receipt
01/18/2006 09:41:13 PACER Login: ud0037 Description: Billable Pages: 2 Client Code: Cost: 0.16 Docket Report Search Criteria: 3:05-cv-03277-MHP

https://ecf.cand.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?106472645013832-L_280_0-1

1/18/2006

Case 1:05-cv-00910-JJF Document 16-2 Case 3:05-cv-03277-MHP Document 1

Filed 08/11/2005 Page 11 of 24 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 24

Case 1:05-cv-00910-JJF Document 16-2 Case 3:05-cv-03277-MHP Document 1

Filed 08/11/2005 Page 22 of 24 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 24

Case 1:05-cv-00910-JJF Document 16-2 Case 3:05-cv-03277-MHP Document 1

Filed 08/11/2005 Page 33 of 24 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 24

Case 1:05-cv-00910-JJF Document 16-2 Case 3:05-cv-03277-MHP Document 1

Filed 08/11/2005 Page 44 of 24 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 24

Case 1:05-cv-00910-JJF Document 16-2 Case 3:05-cv-03277-MHP Document 1

Filed 08/11/2005 Page 55 of 24 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 24

Case 1:05-cv-00910-JJF Document 16-2 Case 3:05-cv-03277-MHP Document 1

Filed 08/11/2005 Page 66 of 24 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 24

Case 1:05-cv-00910-JJF Document 16-2 Case 3:05-cv-03277-MHP Document 1

Filed 08/11/2005 Page 77 of 24 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 24

Case 1:05-cv-00910-JJF Document 16-2 Case 3:05-cv-03277-MHP Document 1

Filed 08/11/2005 Page 88 of 24 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 24

Case 1:05-cv-00910-JJF Document 16-2 Case 3:05-cv-03277-MHP Document 1

Filed 08/11/2005 Page 99 of 24 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 24

Case 1:05-cv-00910-JJF Document 16-2 Case 3:05-cv-03277-MHP Document 1

Filed 08/11/2005 Page 10 of 24 Filed 01/17/2006 Page 10 of 24

Case 1:05-cv-00910-JJF Document 16-2 Case 3:05-cv-03277-MHP Document 1

Filed 08/11/2005 Page 11 of 24 Filed 01/17/2006 Page 11 of 24

Case 1:05-cv-00910-JJF Document 16-2 Case 3:05-cv-03277-MHP Document 1

Filed 08/11/2005 Page 12 of 24 Filed 01/17/2006 Page 12 of 24

Case 1:05-cv-00910-JJF Document 16-2 Case 3:05-cv-03277-MHP Document 1

Filed 08/11/2005 Page 13 of 24 Filed 01/17/2006 Page 13 of 24

Case 1:05-cv-00910-JJF Document 16-2 Case 3:05-cv-03277-MHP Document 1

Filed 08/11/2005 Page 14 of 24 Filed 01/17/2006 Page 14 of 24

Case 1:05-cv-00910-JJF Document 16-2 Case 3:05-cv-03277-MHP Document 1

Filed 08/11/2005 Page 15 of 24 Filed 01/17/2006 Page 15 of 24

Case 1:05-cv-00910-JJF Document 16-2 Case 3:05-cv-03277-MHP Document 1

Filed 08/11/2005 Page 16 of 24 Filed 01/17/2006 Page 16 of 24

Case 1:05-cv-00910-JJF Document 16-2 Case 3:05-cv-03277-MHP Document 1

Filed 08/11/2005 Page 17 of 24 Filed 01/17/2006 Page 17 of 24

Case 1:05-cv-00910-JJF Document 16-2 Case 3:05-cv-03277-MHP Document 1

Filed 08/11/2005 Page 18 of 24 Filed 01/17/2006 Page 18 of 24

Case 1:05-cv-00910-JJF Document 16-2 Case 3:05-cv-03277-MHP Document 1

Filed 08/11/2005 Page 19 of 24 Filed 01/17/2006 Page 19 of 24

Case 1:05-cv-00910-JJF Document 16-2 Case 3:05-cv-03277-MHP Document 1

Filed 08/11/2005 Page 20 of 24 Filed 01/17/2006 Page 20 of 24

Case 1:05-cv-00910-JJF Document 16-2 Case 3:05-cv-03277-MHP Document 1

Filed 08/11/2005 Page 21 of 24 Filed 01/17/2006 Page 21 of 24

Case 1:05-cv-00910-JJF Document 16-2 Case 3:05-cv-03277-MHP Document 1

Filed 08/11/2005 Page 22 of 24 Filed 01/17/2006 Page 22 of 24

Case 1:05-cv-00910-JJF Document 16-2 Case 3:05-cv-03277-MHP Document 1

Filed 08/11/2005 Page 23 of 24 Filed 01/17/2006 Page 23 of 24

Case 1:05-cv-00910-JJF Document 16-2 Case 3:05-cv-03277-MHP Document 1

Filed 08/11/2005 Page 24 of 24 Filed 01/17/2006 Page 24 of 24

Case 1:05-cv-00910-JJF Document 16-3 Case 3:05-cv-03277-MHP Document 2-1

Filed 08/11/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 1 of 1 Page 1 of 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) EDWARD RUSH ) Plaintiff(s) ) ) C 05-03277 EDL -v) ) ORDER SETTING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT INTEL CORPORATION ) CONFERENCE Defendant(s) ) ______________________________) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is assigned to the Honorable Elizabeth D. Laporte. When serving the complaint or notice of removal, the plaintiff or removing defendant must serve on all other parties a copy of this order, the handbook entitled "Dispute Resolution Procedures in the Northern District of California," the Notice of Assignment to United States Magistrate Judge for Trial, and all other documents specified in Civil Local Rule 4-2. Counsel must comply with the case schedule listed below unless the Court otherwise orders. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is assigned to the Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) Multi-Option Program governed by ADR Local Rule 3. Counsel and clients must familiarize themselves with that rule and with the handbook entitled "Dispute Resolution Procedures in the Northern District of California." CASE SCHEDULE [ADR MULTI-OPTION PROGRAM]

Date Event Governing Rule ------------------------------------------------------------------------08/11/2005 Complaint filed 11/22/2005 Last day to meet and confer re initial disclosures, early settlement, ADR process selection, and discovery plan 11/22/2005 Last day to file Joint ADR Certification with Stipulation to ADR process or Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference 12/06/2005 Last day to complete initial disclosures or state objection in Rule 26(f) Report, file/serve Case Management Statement, and file/serve Rule 26(f) Report 12/13/2005 Case Management Conference in Ctrm E, 15th Floor, SF at 3:00 PM FRCivP 26(f) & ADR LR 3-5 Civil L.R. 16-8

FRCivP 26(a)(1) Civil L.R.16-9

Civil L.R. 16-10

Case 1:05-cv-00910-JJF Document 16-4 Case 3:05-cv-03277-MHP Document 2-2

Filed 08/11/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 1 of 1 Page 1 of 1

STANDING ORDER Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte 1) Civil law and motion is heard on Tuesdays at 9:00 a.m. Criminal law and motion is heard on Tuesdays at 11:00 a.m. Counsel need not reserve a hearing date in advance. However, noticed dates may be reset as the court's calendar requires. Case Management Conferences are heard on Tuesdays at 10:00 a.m. Pretrial Conferences are heard on Tuesdays at 2:00 p.m. Discovery motions may be addressed to the Court in three ways. A motion may be noticed on not less than 35 days pursuant to Civil L.R. 7-2. Alternatively, any party may seek an order to shorten or enlarge time under Civil L.R. 6-3 if the circumstances justify that relief. In emergencies during discovery events, the Court is available pursuant to Civil L.R. 37-1(b). In the event a discovery dispute arises, counsel (or if pro se, the party) seeking discovery or a protective order shall confer in good faith with opposing counsel (or pro se party) in an effort to resolve the dispute without court action, as required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 37 and Civil L.R. 37-1(a). A declaration setting forth these meet and confer efforts and the final positions of each party shall be included in the moving papers. The Court will not consider discovery motions unless the moving party has complied with Fed. R. Civ. P. 37 and Civil L.R. 37-1(a). Motions to compel fact discovery must be filed no later than ten days after the fact discovery cutoff. Motions to compel expert discovery must be filed no later than ten days after the expert discovery cutoff. 4) The Court strives to set matters and render decisions in a timely manner. The Court encourages parties to advise the Court by letter to chambers of any matter that appears to have been unduly delayed. For all papers filed in any matter pending before Judge Laporte, a chambers' copy shall be provided and clearly marked. A paper chambers copy of all electronically filed documents must be delivered to the Court no later than 12:00 noon on the day after the document is electronically filed. The paper chambers copy must be marked "Chambers Copy" and must be lodged with the Clerk's Office, in an envelope clearly marked with the judge's name, case number, and "Chambers Copy." Parties must not file a paper copy of any document with the Clerk's Office that has already been filed electronically.

2)

3)

5)

6)

IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: June 4, 2003

__________________________ ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE United States Magistrate Judge

Case 1:05-cv-00910-JJF Document 16-5 Case 3:05-cv-03277-MHP Document 3

Filed 09/12/2005 Page 11 of 3 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

BINGHAM McCUTCHEN LLP DAVID M. BALABANIAN (SBN 37368) CHRISTOPHER B. HOCKETT (SBN 121539) JOY K. FUYUNO (SBN 193890) Three Embarcadero Center San Francisco, California 94111-4067 Telephone: (415) 393-2000 Attorneys for Defendant Intel Corporation

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EDWARD RUSH, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. INTEL CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation, Defendant.

No. C-05-3277 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

IT IS STIPULATED BY AND BETWEEN THE PARTIES, THROUGH THEIR COUNSEL AS FOLLOWS: Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2, Plaintiff Edward Rush and Defendant Intel Corporation hereby stipulate that Intel Corporation's response to Plaintiff's complaint be extended 30 days, up to and including October 12, 2005. This is the first stipulation between the parties. Because this litigation has just begun, granting such a stipulation will not have any negative impact on the schedule of this case. /// /// ///
Case No. C-05-3277

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME
SF/21635212.1

Case 1:05-cv-00910-JJF Document 16-5 Case 3:05-cv-03277-MHP Document 3

Filed 09/12/2005 Page 22 of 3 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 3

1 2

DATED: September 12, 2005 BINGHAM McCUTCHEN LLP

3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME
SF/21635212.1

By:

/s/ Joy K. Fuyuno Joy K. Fuyuno Attorneys for Defendant Intel Corporation

DATED: September 12, 2005 DRUMMOND & ASSOCIATES

By:

/s/ Donald F. Drummond Donald F. Drummond Attorneys for Plaintiff Edward Rush

Case No. C-05-3277

Case 1:05-cv-00910-JJF Document 16-5 Case 3:05-cv-03277-MHP Document 3

Filed 09/12/2005 Page 33 of 3 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 3

1 2 3 4 5

[Proposed] Order to Extend Response Time IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Intel Corporation shall have up to and including October 12, 2005 to respond to Plaintiff Edward Rush's complaint. PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: September ____, 2005

6 _____________________________ 7 United States District Judge 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 3
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME
SF/21635212.1

Case No. C-05-3277

Case 1:05-cv-00910-JJF Document 16-6 Case 3:05-cv-03277-MHP Document 4

Filed 09/12/2005 Page 11 of 2 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

BINGHAM McCUTCHEN LLP DAVID M. BALABANIAN (SBN 37368) CHRISTOPHER B. HOCKETT (SBN 121539) JOY K. FUYUNO (SBN 193890) Three Embarcadero Center San Francisco, California 94111-4067 Telephone: (415) 393-2000 Attorneys for Defendant Intel Corporation

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

EDWARD RUSH, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. INTEL CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation, Defendant.

No. C-05-3277 DEFENDANT'S FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 7.1 AND CIVIL LOCAL RULE 3-16 DISCLOSURE STATEMENTS

14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

Pursuant to Rule 7.1, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the undersigned certifies that there is no parent company and no publicly held entity that owns 10% or more of Intel. Pursuant to Civil L.R. 3-16, the undersigned certifies that as of this date, other than the named parties, there is no such interest to report. /// /// /// /// ///
Case No. C-05-3277

DEFENDANT'S FRCP 7.1 AND CIVIL L.R. 3-16 DISCLOSURES
SF/21635231.1

Case 1:05-cv-00910-JJF Document 16-6 Case 3:05-cv-03277-MHP Document 4

Filed 09/12/2005 Page 22 of 2 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 2

1 2

DATED: September 12, 2005 BINGHAM McCUTCHEN LLP

3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
DEFENDANT'S FRCP 7.1 AND CIVIL L.R. 3-16 DISCLOSURES
SF/21635231.1

By:

/s/ Joy K. Fuyuno Joy K. Fuyuno Attorneys for Defendant Intel Corporation

Case No. C-05-3277

Case 1:05-cv-00910-JJF Document 16-7 Case 3:05-cv-03277-MHP Document 5

Filed 09/13/2005 Page 11 of 3 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

BINGHAM McCUTCHEN LLP DAVID M. BALABANIAN (SBN 37368) CHRISTOPHER B. HOCKETT (SBN 121539) JOY K. FUYUNO (SBN 193890) Three Embarcadero Center San Francisco, California 94111-4067 Telephone: (415) 393-2000 Attorneys for Defendant Intel Corporation

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EDWARD RUSH, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. INTEL CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation, Defendant.

No. C-05-3277 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

IT IS STIPULATED BY AND BETWEEN THE PARTIES, THROUGH THEIR COUNSEL AS FOLLOWS: Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2, Plaintiff Edward Rush and Defendant Intel Corporation hereby stipulate that Intel Corporation's response to Plaintiff's complaint be extended 30 days, up to and including October 12, 2005. This is the first stipulation between the parties. Because this litigation has just begun, granting such a stipulation will not have any negative impact on the schedule of this case. /// /// ///
Case No. C-05-3277

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME
SF/21635212.1

Case 1:05-cv-00910-JJF Document 16-7 Case 3:05-cv-03277-MHP Document 5

Filed 09/13/2005 Page 22 of 3 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 3

1 2

DATED: September 12, 2005 BINGHAM McCUTCHEN LLP

3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME
SF/21635212.1

By:

/s/ Joy K. Fuyuno Joy K. Fuyuno Attorneys for Defendant Intel Corporation

DATED: September 12, 2005 DRUMMOND & ASSOCIATES

By:

/s/ Donald F. Drummond Donald F. Drummond Attorneys for Plaintiff Edward Rush

Case No. C-05-3277

Case 1:05-cv-00910-JJF Document 16-7 Case 3:05-cv-03277-MHP Document 5

Filed 09/13/2005 Page 33 of 3 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 3

1 2 3 4 5

[Proposed] Order to Extend Response Time IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Intel Corporation shall have up to and including October 12, 2005 to respond to Plaintiff Edward Rush's complaint. PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
UNIT ED

S

S DISTRICT TE C TA

Dated: September ____, 2005 13 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 3

United E States District Judge C RN F D IS T IC T O Magistrate R
A

Case No. C-05-3277

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME
SF/21635212.1

LI

FO

_____________________________ rte D. Lapo
lizabeth Judge E

R NIA

IT IS S

O ORD

ERED

RT U O

NO

RT

H

Case 1:05-cv-00910-JJF Document 16-8 Case 3:05-cv-03277-MHP Document 6

Filed 09/29/2005 Page 11 of 2 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 2

Case 1:05-cv-00910-JJF Document 16-8 Case 3:05-cv-03277-MHP Document 6

Filed 09/29/2005 Page 22 of 2 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 2

Case 1:05-cv-00910-JJF Document 16-9 Case 3:05-cv-03277-MHP Document 7

Filed 10/03/2005 Page 11 of 5 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 5

Case 1:05-cv-00910-JJF Document 16-9 Case 3:05-cv-03277-MHP Document 7

Filed 10/03/2005 Page 22 of 5 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 5

Case 1:05-cv-00910-JJF Document 16-9 Case 3:05-cv-03277-MHP Document 7

Filed 10/03/2005 Page 33 of 5 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 5

Case 1:05-cv-00910-JJF Document 16-9 Case 3:05-cv-03277-MHP Document 7

Filed 10/03/2005 Page 44 of 5 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 5

Case 1:05-cv-00910-JJF Document 16-9 Case 3:05-cv-03277-MHP Document 7

Filed 10/03/2005 Page 55 of 5 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 5

Case 1:05-cv-00910-JJF Document 16-10 Case 3:05-cv-03277-MHP Document 8-1

Filed 10/03/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 11of 44 Page of

Case 1:05-cv-00910-JJF Document 16-10 Case 3:05-cv-03277-MHP Document 8-1

Filed 10/03/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 22of 44 Page of

Case 1:05-cv-00910-JJF Document 16-10 Case 3:05-cv-03277-MHP Document 8-1

Filed 10/03/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 33of 44 Page of

Case 1:05-cv-00910-JJF Document 16-10 Case 3:05-cv-03277-MHP Document 8-1

Filed 10/03/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 44of 44 Page of

Case 1:05-cv-00910-JJF Document 16-11 Case 3:05-cv-03277-MHP Document 8-2

Filed 10/03/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 11of 11 Page of 11

Case 1:05-cv-00910-JJF Document 16-11 Case 3:05-cv-03277-MHP Document 8-2

Filed 10/03/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 22of 11 Page of 11

Case 1:05-cv-00910-JJF Document 16-11 Case 3:05-cv-03277-MHP Document 8-2

Filed 10/03/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 33of 11 Page of 11

Case 1:05-cv-00910-JJF Document 16-11 Case 3:05-cv-03277-MHP Document 8-2

Filed 10/03/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 44of 11 Page of 11

Case 1:05-cv-00910-JJF Document 16-11 Case 3:05-cv-03277-MHP Document 8-2

Filed 10/03/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 55of 11 Page of 11

Case 1:05-cv-00910-JJF Document 16-11 Case 3:05-cv-03277-MHP Document 8-2

Filed 10/03/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 66of 11 Page of 11

Case 1:05-cv-00910-JJF Document 16-11 Case 3:05-cv-03277-MHP Document 8-2

Filed 10/03/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 77of 11 Page of 11

Case 1:05-cv-00910-JJF Document 16-11 Case 3:05-cv-03277-MHP Document 8-2

Filed 10/03/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 88of 11 Page of 11

Case 1:05-cv-00910-JJF Document 16-11 Case 3:05-cv-03277-MHP Document 8-2

Filed 10/03/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 99of 11 Page of 11

Case 1:05-cv-00910-JJF Document 16-11 Case 3:05-cv-03277-MHP Document 8-2

Filed 10/03/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 10 of 11 Page 10 of 11

Case 1:05-cv-00910-JJF Document 16-11 Case 3:05-cv-03277-MHP Document 8-2

Filed 10/03/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 11 of 11 Page 11 of 11

Case 1:05-cv-00910-JJF Document 16-12 Case 3:05-cv-03277-MHP Document 8-3

Filed 10/03/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 11of 17 Page of 17

Case 1:05-cv-00910-JJF Document 16-12 Case 3:05-cv-03277-MHP Document 8-3

Filed 10/03/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 22of 17 Page of 17

Case 1:05-cv-00910-JJF Document 16-12 Case 3:05-cv-03277-MHP Document 8-3

Filed 10/03/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 33of 17 Page of 17

Case 1:05-cv-00910-JJF Document 16-12 Case 3:05-cv-03277-MHP Document 8-3

Filed 10/03/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 44of 17 Page of 17

Case 1:05-cv-00910-JJF Document 16-12 Case 3:05-cv-03277-MHP Document 8-3

Filed 10/03/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 55of 17 Page of 17

Case 1:05-cv-00910-JJF Document 16-12 Case 3:05-cv-03277-MHP Document 8-3

Filed 10/03/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 66of 17 Page of 17

Case 1:05-cv-00910-JJF Document 16-12 Case 3:05-cv-03277-MHP Document 8-3

Filed 10/03/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 77of 17 Page of 17

Case 1:05-cv-00910-JJF Document 16-12 Case 3:05-cv-03277-MHP Document 8-3

Filed 10/03/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 88of 17 Page of 17

Case 1:05-cv-00910-JJF Document 16-12 Case 3:05-cv-03277-MHP Document 8-3

Filed 10/03/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 99of 17 Page of 17

Case 1:05-cv-00910-JJF Document 16-12 Case 3:05-cv-03277-MHP Document 8-3

Filed 10/03/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 10 of 17 Page 10 of 17

Case 1:05-cv-00910-JJF Document 16-12 Case 3:05-cv-03277-MHP Document 8-3

Filed 10/03/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 11 of 17 Page 11 of 17

Case 1:05-cv-00910-JJF Document 16-12 Case 3:05-cv-03277-MHP Document 8-3

Filed 10/03/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 12 of 17 Page 12 of 17

Case 1:05-cv-00910-JJF Document 16-12 Case 3:05-cv-03277-MHP Document 8-3

Filed 10/03/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 13 of 17 Page 13 of 17

Case 1:05-cv-00910-JJF Document 16-12 Case 3:05-cv-03277-MHP Document 8-3

Filed 10/03/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 14 of 17 Page 14 of 17

Case 1:05-cv-00910-JJF Document 16-12 Case 3:05-cv-03277-MHP Document 8-3

Filed 10/03/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 15 of 17 Page 15 of 17

Case 1:05-cv-00910-JJF Document 16-12 Case 3:05-cv-03277-MHP Document 8-3

Filed 10/03/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 16 of 17 Page 16 of 17

Case 1:05-cv-00910-JJF Document 16-12 Case 3:05-cv-03277-MHP Document 8-3

Filed 10/03/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 17 of 17 Page 17 of 17

Case 1:05-cv-00910-JJF Document 16-13 Case 3:05-cv-03277-MHP Document 8-4

Filed 10/03/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 11of 33 Page of

Case 1:05-cv-00910-JJF Document 16-13 Case 3:05-cv-03277-MHP Document 8-4

Filed 10/03/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 22of 33 Page of

Case 1:05-cv-00910-JJF Document 16-13 Case 3:05-cv-03277-MHP Document 8-4

Filed 10/03/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 33of 33 Page of

Case 1:05-cv-00910-JJF Document 16-14 Filed 10/03/2005 Page 1 1 of 1 Case 3:05-cv-03277-MHP Document 9 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 1

Case 3:05-cv-03277-MHP Document 9 Case 1:05-cv-00910-JJF Document 16-15 Filed 10/03/2005 Page 1 1 of 1 Case 3:05-cv-03277-MHP Document 10 Filed 10/05/2005 Page 1of 1 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 1

UNIT ED

S

S DISTRICT TE C TA

ER

N

F D IS T IC T O R

A

C

LI

FO

arily Judge M

n H. Pa

tel

R NIA

RT U O

NO

RT

H

Case 1:05-cv-00910-JJF Document 16-16 Case 3:05-cv-03277-MHP Document 11

Filed 11/01/2005 Page 11 of 3 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

BINGHAM McCUTCHEN LLP DAVID M. BALABANIAN (SBN 37368) CHRISTOPHER B. HOCKETT (SBN 121539) JOY K. FUYUNO (SBN 193890) Three Embarcadero Center San Francisco, CA 94111-4067 Telephone: (415) 393-2000 Facsimile: (415) 393-2286 Attorneys for Defendant Intel Corporation

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

EDWARD RUSH, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. INTEL CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, Defendant.

No. C-05-3277-MHP STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO STAY DATES, EVENTS AND DEADLINES PENDING THE OUTCOME OF THE MOTION TO TRANSFER AND COORDINATE OR CONSOLIDATE PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1407

14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

WHEREAS, on August 11, 2005, Plaintiff filed the instant action in the Northern District of California ("Rush Action"); WHEREAS, on or about July 11, 2005, the plaintiffs in Brauch, et al. v. Intel Corp., No. C 05-2743 (BZ) (N. D. Cal., filed July 5, 2005), a related matter, moved before the Judicial Panel on Multi-District Litigation ("MDL"), to transfer and coordinate or consolidate for pre-trial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 407 ("MDL Motion"), and the Rush Action has been identified as a related action subject to that motion;

SF/21642119.1

Case No. C 05-3277 (MHP)

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO STAY DATES, EVENTS AND DEADLINES

Case 1:05-cv-00910-JJF Document 16-16 Case 3:05-cv-03277-MHP Document 11

Filed 11/01/2005 Page 22 of 3 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
SF/21642119.1

WHEREAS, on or about September 29, 2005, Judge Patel issued a Related Case Order relating this case to an earlier filed case assigned to her, and canceling or staying certain but not all dates, events and deadlines in the action; WHEREAS, to date, a decision has not been rendered on the MDL Motion; WHEREAS, the outcome of the MDL Motion will impact significantly the schedule of this case; THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2, by and among counsel for Plaintiff Rush, and counsel for Defendant Intel Corporation, that any events, dates or deadlines set by the Local Rules or Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, including the Local Rules for Alternative Dispute Resolution ("ADR Local Rules") and Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 16 and 26, and any deadlines established in any case management order applicable to this case should be stayed pending the outcome of the aforementioned MDL Motion; and IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED by the aforementioned parties that if a case management conference is rescheduled by the Court, the parties shall adjust the dates for any conference, disclosures or reports required by the Local Rules or Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, including the ADR Local Rules and Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 16 and 26 accordingly. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED. Dated: November 1, 2005 DRUMMOND & ASSOCIATES By: /s/ Donald F. Drummond Donald F. Drummond Attorneys for Plaintiff Edward Rush

2

Case No. C 05-3277 (MHP)

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO STAY DATES, EVENTS AND DEADLINES

Case 1:05-cv-00910-JJF Document 16-16 Case 3:05-cv-03277-MHP Document 11

Filed 11/01/2005 Page 33 of 3 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

Dated: November 1, 2005

BINGHAM McCUTCHEN LLP By: ________/s/ Joy K. Fuyuno____ Joy K. Fuyuno Attorneys for Defendant Intel Corporation

[PROPOSED] ORDER TO STAY DATES, EVENTS AND DEADLINES PENDING THE OUTCOME OF THE MDL MOTION Any events, dates or deadlines set by the Local Rules or Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, including the Local Rules for Alternative Dispute Resolution ("ADR Local Rules") and Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 16 and 26, and any deadlines established in any case management order applicable to this case are hereby stayed pending the outcome of the motion to transfer and coordinate or consolidate pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407 ("MDL Motion"). Upon the determination of the MDL Motion, if it is necessary for the Court to reschedule a case management conference, the parties shall adjust the dates for any conference, disclosures or reports required by the ADR Local Rules and Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 16 and 26 accordingly. The parties shall notify the Clerk of Court within 10 days of the decision on the MDL Motion. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: Honorable Marilyn H. Patel United States District Court Judge

SF/21642119.1

3

Case No. C 05-3277 (MHP)

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO STAY DATES, EVENTS AND DEADLINES

Case 1:05-cv-00910-JJF Document 16-17 Case 3:05-cv-03277-MHP Document 12

Filed 11/08/2005 Page 11 of 3 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 3

Case 1:05-cv-00910-JJF Document 16-17 Case 3:05-cv-03277-MHP Document 12

Filed 11/08/2005 Page 22 of 3 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 3

Case 1:05-cv-00910-JJF Document 16-17 Case 3:05-cv-03277-MHP Document 12

Filed 11/08/2005 Page 33 of 3 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 3

Case 1:05-cv-00910-JJF Document 16-18 Case 3:05-cv-03277-MHP Document 13-1

Filed 11/17/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 1 of 2 Page 1 of 2

Case 1:05-cv-00910-JJF Document 16-18 Case 3:05-cv-03277-MHP Document 13-1

Filed 11/17/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 2 of 2 Page 2 of 2

Case 1:05-cv-00910-JJF Document 16-19 Case 3:05-cv-03277-MHP Document 13-2

Filed 11/17/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 1 of 4 Page 1 of 4

Case 1:05-cv-00910-JJF Document 16-19 Case 3:05-cv-03277-MHP Document 13-2

Filed 11/17/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 2 of 4 Page 2 of 4

Case 1:05-cv-00910-JJF Document 16-19 Case 3:05-cv-03277-MHP Document 13-2

Filed 11/17/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 3 of 4 Page 3 of 4

Case 1:05-cv-00910-JJF Document 16-19 Case 3:05-cv-03277-MHP Document 13-2

Filed 11/17/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 4 of 4 Page 4 of 4

Case 1:05-cv-00910-JJF Document 16-20 Case 3:05-cv-03277-MHP Document 14

Filed 01/05/2006 Page 11 of 1 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 1

Case 1:05-cv-00910-JJF Document 16-21 Case 3:05-cv-03277-MHP Document 15

Filed 01/10/2006 Page 11 of 8 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 8

Case 1:05-cv-00910-JJF Document 16-21 Case 3:05-cv-03277-MHP Document 15

Filed 01/10/2006 Page 22 of 8 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 8

Case 1:05-cv-00910-JJF Document 16-21 Case 3:05-cv-03277-MHP Document 15

Filed 01/10/2006 Page 33 of 8 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 8

Case 1:05-cv-00910-JJF Document 16-21 Case 3:05-cv-03277-MHP Document 15

Filed 01/10/2006 Page 44 of 8 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 8

Case 1:05-cv-00910-JJF Document 16-21 Case 3:05-cv-03277-MHP Document 15

Filed 01/10/2006 Page 55 of 8 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 8

Case 1:05-cv-00910-JJF Document 16-21 Case 3:05-cv-03277-MHP Document 15

Filed 01/10/2006 Page 66 of 8 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 8

Case 1:05-cv-00910-JJF Document 16-21 Case 3:05-cv-03277-MHP Document 15

Filed 01/10/2006 Page 77 of 8 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 8

Case 1:05-cv-00910-JJF Document 16-21 Case 3:05-cv-03277-MHP Document 15

Filed 01/10/2006 Page 88 of 8 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 8

Case 1:05-cv-00910-JJF Document 16-22 Case 3:05-cv-03277-MHP Document 16

Filed 01/11/2006 Page 11 of 2 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Northern District of California 450 Golden Gate Avenue San Francisco, California 94102

_____________

www.cand.uscourts.gov Richard W. Wieking Clerk General Court Number 415.522.2000

January 11, 2006 United States District Court for the District of Delaware Lockbox 18 844 North King Street Boggs Federal Building Wilmington, Delaware 19801 RE: In Re Intel Corporation, Inc., Antitrust Litigation - MDL - 1717 CV 05-2830 MHP 05-894 JJF (D/DE) CV 05-2831 MHP 05-895 JJF (D/DE) CV 05-2834 MHP 05-896 JJF (D/DE) CV 05-2858 MHP 05-897 JJF (D/DE) CV 05-2859 MHP 05-898 JJF (D/DE) CV 05-2882 MHP 05-899 JJF (D/DE) CV 05-2897 MHP 05-900 JJF (D/DE) CV 05-2898 MHP 05-901 JJF (D/DE) CV 05-2916 MHP 05-902 JJF (D/DE) CV 05-2957 MHP 05-903 JJF (D/DE) CV 05-3028 MHP 05-904 JJF (D/DE) CV 05-3094 MHP 05-905 JJF (D/DE) CV 05-3197 MHP 05-906 JJF (D/DE) CV 05-3271 MHP 05-907 JJF (D/DE) CV 05-3272 MHP 05-908 JJF (D/DE) CV 05-3273 MHP 05-909 JJF (D/DE) CV 05-3277 MHP 05-910 JJF (D/DE)

Dear Clerk, Pursuant to an order transferring the above captioned cases to your court, transmitted herewith are: (U) (U) (U) Certified copy of docket entries Certified copy of TRANSFERRAL ORDER Original case file documents

(U) Please be advised that the above entitled action was previously designated to the Electronic Case Filing program. You can access electronically filed documents through PACER referencing the Northern District of California case number at https://ecf.cand.uscourts.gov Please acknowledge receipt of the above documents on the attached copy of this letter.

Case 1:05-cv-00910-JJF Document 16-22 Case 3:05-cv-03277-MHP Document 16

Filed 01/11/2006 Page 22 of 2 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 2

Sincerely, RICHARD W. WIEKING, Clerk

by: Gina Agustine-Rivas Case Systems Administrator Enclosures Copies to counsel of record