Free Remark - District Court of Delaware - Delaware


File Size: 191.6 kB
Pages: 3
Date: December 31, 1969
File Format: PDF
State: Delaware
Category: District Court of Delaware
Author: unknown
Word Count: 751 Words, 4,194 Characters
Page Size: 792 x 612 pts (letter)
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ded/36031/38-17.pdf

Download Remark - District Court of Delaware ( 191.6 kB)


Preview Remark - District Court of Delaware
Case 1 :06-cv-00041-JJF Document 38-17 Filed O1/23/2006 Page 1 of 3
1 The Honorable R. Martinez
2
3
4
5
1 6
7
8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
9 AT SEATTLE
10 AMAZON.COM, INC. and A9.COM, INC., ) N0. 05-01137RSM
)
11 Plaintiffs, ) REPLY DECLARATION OF JAMES
) V. FAZIO IN SUPPORT OF -
12 vs. ) DEFENDANTS’ (1) MOTION TO
) DISMISS ALL CLAIMS AGAINST
13 CENDANT CORPORATION; TRILEGIANT ) CENDANT; (2) MOTION TO
, CORPORATION; ORBITZ, LLC; ORBITZ, ) DISMISS THE COMPLAINT FOR
I4 INC.; BUDGET RENT A CAR SYSTEM, INC.; ) FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM OR,
and AVIS RENT A CAR SYSTEM, INC., ) IN THE ALTERNATIVE, FOR MORE
15 ) DEFINITE STATEMENT; (3)
Defendants. ) MOTION TO STAY ALL
16 ) DISCOVERY; AND (4) MOTION TO
) TRANSFER VENUE
17 )
A 1
18 ) [ORAL ARGUMENT REQUESTED]
1 9 g
) NOTE ON MOTION CALENDAR:
20
g September 16, 2005
21
l 22
23
24
25
26 REPLY FAZIO oEcLARAT1oN 1/s/o DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS - PAUL. HASTINGS, JAN<>FSKY & WALKER
_ I sm vALLEY csmmz muvs
SAN/1215821 sANnm0o, cA921s0
NO. 0s-01137RsM
m32273-632283.doc

Case 1:06-cv-00041-JJF Document 38-17 Filed O1/23/2006 Page 2 of 3
1 I, James V. Fazio, III, declare as follows:
2 1. I am an associate with the law firm of Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker LLP,
3 counsel for defendants in the above-entitled action. I have been admitted to practice in this
4 District pro hac vice. I have personal knowledge of the following facts and, if called upon to do
5 so, I could and would testify competently thereto. ·
1 6 2. Attached hereto as Exhibit A is a true and correct copy of Asip v. Nielsen Media
7 Research, Inc., 2004 WL 315269 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 18, 2004).
8 3. Attached hereto as Exhibit B is a true and correct copy of Intel v. Hyundai Elecs.
9 Am., Inc., 1987 U.S Dist. LEXIS 14727 (N.D.Ca1. Nov. 23, 1987).+
10 4. Attached hereto as Exhibit C is a true and correct copy of Johnson Products Co. v.
11 Pro-Line Corp., 1998 WL 699024 (N .D.Ill. Oct. 5, 1998).
12 5. Attached hereto as Exhibit D is a true and correct copy of Laitram Corp. v.
13 Morehouse, 31 U.S.P.Q.2d 1697 (E.D.La. 1994).
1 14 6. Attached hereto as Exhibit E is a true and correct copy of Oki Elec. Industry Co.,
15 Ltd v. LG Semicon Co., Ltd, 1998 U.S.Dist. LEXIS 22507 (N.D.Ca1. Feb. 25, 1998).
16 7. Attached hereto as Exhibit F is a true and correct copy of Pinpoint, Inc. v.
17 Amazon.com, 2003 WL 22175514 (N.D. Ill. Sep. 19, 2003).
18 8. Attached hereto as Exhibit G is a true and correct copy of Quantel Ltd v. Adobe
19 Systems Inc., 1996 U.S.Dist. LEXIS 21651 (D.Del. Dec. 12, 1996).
20 9. Attached hereto as Exhibit H is a true and correct copy of R2 Technology, Inc. v.
21 Intelligent Sys. Software, Inc., 2002 U.S.Dist. LEXIS 19110 (D.Del. Oct. 9, 2002).
1 22 10. Attached hereto as Exhibit I is a true and correct copy of Shearing v. Optical
23 Radiation Corp., 1994 WL 382444 (D.Nev. Mar. 25, 1994).
24 11. Attached hereto as Exhibit J is a true and correct copy of Syngenta Seeds, Inc. v.
25 Monsanto Co., 2005 WL 678855 (D.Del. Mar. 24, 2005).
26 REPLY FAZIO DECLARATION vs/o DErEr~1DANrs* Morrons - PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER
3579 ?$?`é$€l?¤i?$YE
Ne. 05-or 137RSM
m2227s-632223.dOc

Case 1 :06-cv-00041-JJF Document 38-17 Filed O1/23/2006 Page 3 of 3
1 12. Attached hereto as Exhibit K is a tme and correct copy of Upjohn C0. v. Syntro
2 Corp., 14 U.S.P.Q.2d 1469 (D.De1. 1990).
3 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States that the foregoing
4 is true and correct. Executed this Eith day of September, 2005 at San Diego, California.
5
1 6 By; @22/% I
7 I JAME V. FAZIO, III
8
9 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
1 O I hereby certify that on September 16, 2005, I presented the foregoing to the Clerk of the
I I Court using the CM/ECF system, which will send notification of such filing to the following:
12 David T. McDonald
1 3 [email protected]
1 14 Attorneys for Plaintiffs
I 5 /s/ K. Michael Fandel I
K. Michael Fandel
l 6
_ l 7
l 8 .
l 9
20
21
i 22 ·
23
24
25
26 REPLY 1=Az1o DEcLARAT1oN 1/s/o DEFENDANTS MOTIONS - PAUL, HASTINGS. JANOFSKY & WALKER
_ 3 ssvs VALLEY cemius muva
SAN/1215821 sm nmco, cp. 92130
No. 05·0l 137RsM
m32273-632283.doc