Free Answer to Counterclaim - District Court of Delaware - Delaware

Case 1:06-cv-00043-SLR Document 19 Filed 10/O9/2006 Page 1 of 3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
TRANSACTION HOLDINGS LTD. L.L.C., 2
Plaintifi]
v. : Civil Action No. 06--43 (SLR)
IYG HOLDINGS CO., 7-ELEVEN, INC., VCOM IURY TRIAL DEMANDED
FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC., :
Defendants.
x
PLAINTIFF TRANSACTION HOLDINGS LTD.
L.L.C.'S REPLY TO DEFENDANTS' COUNTERCLAIM
Plaintiff Transaction Holdings Ltd. L.L.C. (hereinafter "Transaction Holdings"), pleads
as follows in response to defendants IYG Holding Co., 7—E1even, inc., and Vcorn Financial
Services, Incfs (coliectively "defendants") counterclainis as set forth in paragraphs 19-23 of
Defendants Answer, Defenses and Counterclaimsz
19. Transaction Holdings admits that defendants counterclaim is purportedly brought
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1338(a), 2201, and/or 2202 and that this Court has subject matter and
jmisdiction to hear and decide this connterciaim.
20. Transaction Holdings denies that the patent-in—suit is invalid for faiiure to meet
the conditions of Title 35 of the United States Code, including, but not limited to, 35 U.S.C.
§§ 102, 103, and 112.
21. Transaction Holdings denies that the patent—in-suit is invalid in view of the prior
art pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §§ 102 and 103.
22. Transaction Holdings denies that the defendants have not infringed any valid
claim of the patent·-in·-suit.

Case 1:06-cv-00043-SLR Document 19 Filed 10/O9/2006 Page 2 of 3
23. Transaction Holdings denies that for the defendants this case is an exceptional
case under 35 U.S.C. § 285 and denies that defendants are entitled to an award under 35 U.S.C.
§ 285.
WHEREFORE, Transaction Holdings prays for the following relief:
A. An order dismissing defendants counterclairns with prejudice and denying the
relief requested in such counterclaiins.
B. An award of attorney fees and costs associated with Transaction Holdings
responses to defendants counterclaims, including attorney fees and costs available pursuant to 35
U.S.C. § 285; and
C. Such other and further relief as this Court deems necessary and just.
CONNOLLY BOVE LODGE & HUTZ LLP
/s/ Arthur G. Connolly, III
Arthur G. Connolly, III (#2667)
The Nemours Building
EGO7 North Orange Street
Wilmington, DE 1980l
Tel: 3026589141
Fax: 302.658.56%
Attorneys for Plaintyf
Transaction Holdings Ltd L.L. C.
OF COUNSEL:
Joseph S. Littenberg
Stephen F. Roth
Kevin M. Kocun
LERNER, DAVID, LITTENBERG,
KRUMHOLZ & MENTLIK, LLP
600 South Avenue West
Westfield, NJ 07090—l497
Tel: 908.654.5000
Fax: 908.654/7866
Dated: October 9, 2006
tenant
2

Case 1:06-cv-00043-SLR Document 19 Filed 10/O9/2006 Page 3 of 3
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that on October 9, 2006, I electronically tiled the foregoing
document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF which will send notification of such tiling
to the following counsel of record:
Richard L. Horwitz, Esq.
David E. Moore, Esq.
Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP
Hercules Plaza, 6th Floor
1313 N. Market Street
Wilmington, DE 1980l
I FURTHER CERTIFY that on October 9, 2006, I have Electronically Mailed the
foregoing document to the following non-registered participants:
Eric J. Lobenfeld, Esq. I
ira J. Schaefer, Esq.
Arun Chandra, Esq.
Huangyong Gao, Esq.
Hogan & Hartson LLP
875 Third Avenue
New York, NY 10022
[email protected] l
ijschaeferg@,hhlaw.com
achandra@,hhlaw.co1n
[email protected]
/s/Arthur G. Connolly, III
Arthur G. Connolly, III (#2667)
#4s0sv¢_1