Free Mail Returned - District Court of Delaware - Delaware


File Size: 25.7 kB
Pages: 2
Date: November 30, 2006
File Format: PDF
State: Delaware
Category: District Court of Delaware
Author: unknown
Word Count: 401 Words, 2,481 Characters
Page Size: 622 x 792 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ded/36067/80.pdf

Download Mail Returned - District Court of Delaware ( 25.7 kB)


Preview Mail Returned - District Court of Delaware
Case 1106-cv OOO
- - 53-JJF Docum 1
ent 80
_ N Fl|6d11{30/ •j ___1_ |Z>ag91 Ofz
` ·h: HZ "i 1 -. E
cn H0 r·~ Q
E`- C15 if 11 . E
as v—~ cv- .· E 1
mn N x- i` Q
:*1:, wg ~ _-UAE
m G 11.&=`§%’ ?“
1 ¤. z *5*;
E12 , .1:
1 W QQ az
L maj`? gl I- - ·
*1 'ivm 1~ °
¤.c:.:z $1 1 Q 1 1
1 16*5 ZT:2 1
:115 me $35::2
I @6* 4} I1" ws 1% g¥E'J.nJ¤¤
ru. " -1 -1** mc:
1 Ewa N] 1.7* ·r·’ 1* '__;=é.=;·|.|,.
if r*’ F"·~· *9 `
§E:;“
5 wzzsié
Q C0 :::1.uva Z
1 yu,. I··'
§' g 8 252;:
1 5;; W S mwmm
I? (N 2f 4 c.> uu
E 3 E O
2 E3
"" 1%
E un
. an
.¤ JJ CD C) -
-.-1 m m pt 1
· $1 SS >·: E
1 =r· 0 4.¤ 1
¤ m cu
13*** E?
H •—1 H O O
cd un cg - cu
z'. un cm rm ED
1 2 1 1 CD 11;%
f I Q *;*\
1,; ··‘* *5} E
= E A {lp N "`:`T§`
1 x6§?· ¤> :.:1.1
` un ‘ 1 __." .i
1 1 E z za m N 1 1
U E A $3, E E; :> QE
. ¤¤ .2 +3 =° 3 E&' O CEE
`VWE 5 1 .. .1,11 1 ~
tr. vn F = u _ ,
u-¤ IU Q 0 *5 1
OB ..__ .,.,` !
.E § né
E 1
i

Case 1:06-cv-00053-JJF Document 80 Filed 11/30/2006 ‘ Page 2 of2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
JAMES A. WILSON, GILBERT WILLIAMS, ) G
JR., JEROME GREEN, JOSESERPA, )
WILLIAM COLEMAN, MARVIN SMITH, )
DeSHAWN TATMAN, JEREL CUSTIN, )
and FRED NEWSOME, ) P.;
Plaintiffs, )
) Civil Action N0. 06-53-KAJ my
I °“` R
HELEN LOHMAN, SCOTT MORGAN, )
TOM CARVAN, JAY PLUMMER, and JOE )
FIELDS. I
I
Defendants. )
ORDER -
On September 14, 2006, defendants filed a motion to dismiss pIaintiffs’
retaliation claim for failure to state a claim. (D.I. 76; the "Motion".) Plaintiffs filed a
response to the Motion on September 29, 2006 (D.I. 77.) Both parties have submitted
evidence beyond the pleadings in support of their positions on the Motion. Pursuant to ·
Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Motion is therefore to be treated as
one for summaryjudgment and disposed of as provided in Rule 56.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that if either party has a position with respect to the
Motion being treated as one for summaryjudgment, or wishes to submit additional
evidence to supplement its filings, it should so advise the court on or before December
8, 2006. g Q
U ITED STA DI T ICT JUDGE
November §;2006 -- I ..
Wilmington, Delaware