Free Letter - District Court of Delaware - Delaware


File Size: 61.9 kB
Pages: 2
Date: May 14, 2007
File Format: PDF
State: Delaware
Category: District Court of Delaware
Author: unknown
Word Count: 354 Words, 2,128 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ded/36088/19.pdf

Download Letter - District Court of Delaware ( 61.9 kB)


Preview Letter - District Court of Delaware
Case 1:06-cv-00065-SLR

Document 19

Filed 05/14/2007

Page 1 of 2

U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney's Office District of Delaware

1007 N.Orange Street, Suite 700 P.O. Box 2046 Wilmington, Delaware 19899-2046

(302) 573-6277 FAX (302) 573-6220 TTY (302) 573- 6274 Toll Free (888) 293-8162

May 14, 2007 VIA E-FILING The Honorable Sue L. Robinson J. Caleb Boggs Federal Building 844 N. King Street Room 6124 Lockbox 31 Wilmington, DE 19801 RE: Baer v. United States, No. 06-65 (D. Del.)

Dear Chief Judge Robinson: I write on behalf of all parties to the above-referenced action. On April 17, 2007, the parties appeared before the Honorable Magistrate Judge Thynge for mediation but have not yet been able to agree on a settlement. Because the Court's scheduling order does not specify a trial date for this matter, the parties respectfully request a teleconference with the Court to schedule a trial date. At trial the Plaintiffs intend to prove, in addition to the other elements of their claims, that they can recover more than the amounts they submitted in their administrative claims to the Postal Service based on alleged "newly discovered evidence not reasonably discoverable at the time of presenting the claim to the federal agency, or upon allegation and proof of intervening facts, relating to the amount of the claim." See 28 U.S.C. ยง 2675. The Defendant does not believe Plaintiffs will be able to meet their burden of proof regarding that issue. The parties agree, with the Court's permission, that this issue can be determined at trial. Plaintiffs also do not object to the Defendant deposing the Plaintiffs' expert on this issue, and the Defendant does not object to Plaintiffs deposing any witnesses the Defendant intends to call at trial. The parties are available at the call of the Court to address any questions or concerns.

Case 1:06-cv-00065-SLR

Document 19

Filed 05/14/2007 Respectfully, COLM F. CONNOLLY United States Attorney

Page 2 of 2

By: /s/ Seth M. Beausang Seth M. Beausang (I.D. No. 4071) Assistant United States Attorney cc: Vincent A. Bifferato, Jr. (by e-file)

-2-